Jump to content

Specific Trade Ideas


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

One of my own:  The White Sox send SP Lucas Giolito (FA after this season) to the O's for SS/2B Joey Ortiz (#65 on MLB's Top 100 Prospects list)

The White Sox have a brutally struggling Tim Anderson at SS, but have a hole at 2B as well.  I'd be okay if they prefer Norby. It may be a lot to give up for half a season, but Giolito could be a real difference maker in getting to the playoffs and how far we advance.

 

Makes sense, though I think the White Sox would demand more than just Ortiz/Norby.  Just a guess but I bet they'd probably want one of our arms in return too -- either Hall/Johnson/Povich or Kremer/Irvin.  Maybe we could get away with giving them another position player or two lower down instead.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pdiddy said:

For comparison’s sake the Astros gave up their 3,9,11 for Verlander.

Corbin Burnes isn’t Justin Verlander. 
 

I don’t necessarily think it’s an overlay but it has to be considered that the O’s likely would have zero chance of retaining Burnes. If the org thinks that he is good enough to propel them over the Rays for the remainder of this year amd next year and that he could be part of a WS run this year and next year then I could see them doing it. 
 

I am not sure that the Brewers would do it though as their 5th, 6th and 8th ranked prospects are SS/2B/3B. Their top two guys are OF. I almost feel like they would be looking for another pitcher in addition to Hall and Westburg. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s definitely not an overpay. 

Is 2023 Burnes > 2017 Verlander?

Milwaukee owes us somehow after how crappy K Rod was for us and then magically returned to All Star status when he returned to the Brewers the next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pdiddy said:

Is 2023 Burnes > 2017 Verlander?

Milwaukee owes us somehow after how crappy K Rod was for us and then magically returned to All Star status when he returned to the Brewers the next year. 

I don’t think so due to the declining K rate of Burnes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, banks703 said:

Corbin Burnes isn’t Justin Verlander. 
 

I don’t necessarily think it’s an overlay but it has to be considered that the O’s likely would have zero chance of retaining Burnes. If the org thinks that he is good enough to propel them over the Rays for the remainder of this year amd next year and that he could be part of a WS run this year and next year then I could see them doing it. 
 

I am not sure that the Brewers would do it though as their 5th, 6th and 8th ranked prospects are SS/2B/3B. Their top two guys are OF. I almost feel like they would be looking for another pitcher in addition to Hall and Westburg. 

At the time of the trade, Verlander was thought of as a former ace towards the end of his career.  He was thought as more of a solid #2.  I remember there being a major opinion that Houston got the worse end of the deal being stuck w/ most of his huge salary.  I think Detroit had to pick up $8 mill/yr. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, pdiddy said:

For comparison’s sake the Astros gave up their 3,9,11 for Verlander.

And none of those guys - except for Rogers, very minimally - have contributed much at the major league level.  Just shows that highly ranked prospects can flame out, and Houston didn't have a horrible system.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a "downer" but I don't see ME trading for a TOR starter.  Unless he is being coy he stated that "he doesn't like the way the market for starters is panning out"-paraphrased on High Heat.  To me that is the start of a rationalization regurgitated from free agency.

I really like Elias but he would have been better served signing another starter in FA and trading Mateo in the off season while he had value.  The Orioles have been very, very fortunate with the health of their starters and if they lose a starter or two..... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

What about 2+ years of Mitch Keller of the Pirates? He's really putting together a terrific year. Might they be interested in something like Joey Ortiz and Kremer? 

I don't see the Pirates trading that guy, and if they do, they will get a haul from some team, and if it's us, people won't be happy with what we had to give up.....just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, pdiddy said:

Is 2023 Burnes > 2017 Verlander?

Milwaukee owes us somehow after how crappy K Rod was for us and then magically returned to All Star status when he returned to the Brewers the next year. 

Ummm, we did send them Jonathan Schoop 🙂😬

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...