Jump to content

Specific Trade Ideas


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

It's going to be a seller's market.  The AL only has 4 teams out of the wild card race.  NL has a few more teams probably selling, but there will be more buyers than sellers.

This is the trick. The Brewers are only 2 games out, so they're not going to trade Burnes, and the White Sox are only 8 games out of first place, so I doubt Giolito or Graveman are available. I want a starter for the stretch run, so what teams are selling? Looks like we've got the Royals, A's, Mets, Nationals, Rockies and possibly the Cardinals. The Pirates and Padres are only 9.5 out of first. But with the Wild Card, realistically, I can only see 5 teams who are sellers: Royals, A's, Mets, Nationals, and Rockies. Daniel Lynch is the only starter on the Royals I like, but I doubt he's available. Is J.P Spears available from the A's? He could be an intriguing trade option that we wouldn't have to give up a premium prospect for. Or what would it take to get Kodai Senga or Verlander from the Mets? Probably a Kjerstad and Ortiz. The Rockies might have some pitchers in Kyle Freeland, German Marques, Ryan Feltner, Austin Bomber or Connor Seabold, none of which should be too expensive. Now the Nationals have some nice arms in MacKenzie Gore, Josiah Gray, Patrick Corbin, Trevor Williams and Jake Irvin. Not sure how many of them would be available, but one of them might make for a nice addition.

There may be other pitchers available, but these are the names I think we have a shot at. But what intangibles are we looking at? Do we want good leadership and clubhouse presence? I don't know who qualifies in that respect. Verlander? For me, I'd want to target Senga. I like him a lot and would see if we could get him for Kjerstad and Ortiz. Might have to depart with Basallo or Hall too. But I would do that trade. I'd also want to explore getting Spears. Those are the two I'd like to get.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, pdiddy said:

I love an E Rod and Foley (ground balls and not HR-prone) combo deal. Their top two prospects are 3B/2B and 2B so perhaps they’d like to trick out 4/5/6 for the next few years but it makes it harder to come up with the “plus” - OF maybe. 

Ortiz gets to stay at SS  his best position. Stowers gives them an OF bat with pop. Irvin gives them a back end SP to eat innings while they wait on their young pitchers to get healthy and develop. For ERod and Foley

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AnythingO's said:

Ortiz gets to stay at SS  his best position. Stowers gives them an OF bat with pop. Irvin gives them a back end SP to eat innings while they wait on their young pitchers to get healthy and develop. For ERod and Foley

I’d do that I think - if E Rods next two starts are good. Would want to make sure the finger is ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pdiddy said:

I’d do that I think - if E Rods next two starts are good. Would want to make sure the finger is ok.

Nothing I have read about the finger injury makes me believe it is career ending, just something to nurse back to health. The question mark should keep the price down some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the Mets are looking to reload.  Senga has been their best pitcher.  I heard Scherzer might be available more than Verlander.  Angelos and $43 mill salary is a no for sure.  Maybe one of the Mets relievers would be available?  I've heard Robertson mentioned. 

The White Sox should be sellers, they're 15 games under .500.  No way they come back from that.  I thought they had a rebuild that would work.  Lots of guys on big extensions underperforming.

I'm thinking Giolito is about the best the O's are going to trade for at the trade deadline.  I can't see Elias trading what would be needed for a controllable starter, maybe in the offseason. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, linedrive said:

This is the trick. The Brewers are only 2 games out, so they're not going to trade Burnes, and the White Sox are only 8 games out of first place, so I doubt Giolito or Graveman are available. I want a starter for the stretch run, so what teams are selling? Looks like we've got the Royals, A's, Mets, Nationals, Rockies and possibly the Cardinals. The Pirates and Padres are only 9.5 out of first. But with the Wild Card, realistically, I can only see 5 teams who are sellers: Royals, A's, Mets, Nationals, and Rockies. Daniel Lynch is the only starter on the Royals I like, but I doubt he's available. Is J.P Spears available from the A's? He could be an intriguing trade option that we wouldn't have to give up a premium prospect for. Or what would it take to get Kodai Senga or Verlander from the Mets? Probably a Kjerstad and Ortiz. The Rockies might have some pitchers in Kyle Freeland, German Marques, Ryan Feltner, Austin Bomber or Connor Seabold, none of which should be too expensive. Now the Nationals have some nice arms in MacKenzie Gore, Josiah Gray, Patrick Corbin, Trevor Williams and Jake Irvin. Not sure how many of them would be available, but one of them might make for a nice addition.

There may be other pitchers available, but these are the names I think we have a shot at. But what intangibles are we looking at? Do we want good leadership and clubhouse presence? I don't know who qualifies in that respect. Verlander? For me, I'd want to target Senga. I like him a lot and would see if we could get him for Kjerstad and Ortiz. Might have to depart with Basallo or Hall too. But I would do that trade. I'd also want to explore getting Spears. Those are the two I'd like to get.

 

Very intriguing post.  Kodai Senga is a great idea, though I think too ambitious for the Orioles to pursue and can't see why the Mets would trade him without getting strong young pitching in return. 

I doubt Verlander will cost that much in a trade considering how much money he is making this year and next -- and his age.  The Mets would have to eat a huge amount of his salary to get Ortiz and Kjerstad in return -- and even then I think that's probably a bit of an overpay for a 40 year old pitcher.  And even if the Mets ate half his salary the Orioles would still owe him over $20 million next year.  I would love for the O's to get Verlander, though.  He's pitched well his last several games.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While getting a ToR should be a strong consideration, could Elias instead consider serious upgrades to the bullpen?  Not that he can't do both, but if the cost is too high for starters, going the bullpen route seems to make sense.

Maybe we save on the prospect cost by targeting two strong bullpen arms?  Not closers, as they would likely be cost prohibitive and we have our own, but rather guys to bridge the gap from innings 6 and 7 to get to Cano and Bautista.  Guys like Jason Foley, mentioned earlier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, casadeozo said:

What about a trade with the Angels.

maybe Ben Joyce for Urias and a minor leaguer? Maybe Prieto?

Joyce has only 28 innings in the minors and 4 IP in LA.   While he's talented, I doubt he's the kind of reliever we'd target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Not Westburg but if they’d be interested in Ortiz and Stowers as a replacement I would. 

Burnes is a 4 ERA pitcher this year with 1 more year of control for 3 of our top 12 and another player……I say NO! 

Edited by Roll Tide
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

While getting a ToR should be a strong consideration, could Elias instead consider serious upgrades to the bullpen?  Not that he can't do both, but if the cost is too high for starters, going the bullpen route seems to make sense.

Maybe we save on the prospect cost by targeting two strong bullpen arms?  Not closers, as they would likely be cost prohibitive and we have our own, but rather guys to bridge the gap from innings 6 and 7 to get to Cano and Bautista.  Guys like Jason Foley, mentioned earlier. 

I see him more willing to part with pieces that will land a few quality MR than a haul to get a top starter.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...