Jump to content

Specific Trade Ideas


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

Are the Nats interested in trading Gore and Harvey  For Povich, Norby, and a filler?  Not sure they want to move Gore though…

Harvey probably isn’t expensive to get. Don’t know about Gore …. I think you can deal Harvey and give up a 12-17 prospect. Maybe Haskins or Fabian…..If I’m giving up Norby it’s for a big piece . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

Mets David Robertson for Prieto or lower talent.

Robertson was just traded last year and the Cubs got top 100 prospect Ben Brown for only 3 months. He has even better numbers this year. It's going to take a good bit more than Prieto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

Robertson was just traded last year and the Cubs got top 100 prospect Ben Brown for only 3 months. He has even better numbers this year. It's going to take a good bit more than Prieto.

Last year you had another season of control. If he costs more than the #15 ish player in the best system I’d probably just pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not interested in giving up any of our top 15 prospects for less than half a year rental. 

I like the Goldschmidt option, and either of the 2 Cardinals pitchers SG suggested.  If we can get those, or other similar options done using:

Stowers, Hall, Pieto/Norby/Ortiz.. and some 15-20 prospects. 

If not, I'll double down with what we have. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want an elite BP arm, but only as a rental.  Not interested in paying the price cost- controlled would cost.  Similarly would rather pay less for a guy like Giolito.  I would use the excess position player talent to trade for other minor league pitchers.  I just don’t think there are or will be TOR guys that are worth the risk of and dollars of trading away big time talent for. 
 

 

Edited by baltfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Fan4Life said:

I'm not interested in giving up any of our top 15 prospects for less than half a year rental. 

 

 

I agree. Moreover, I just believe there are certain players that Elias is bound and determined to see as Orioles,, including Mayo and Kjerstad, and will not trade under any circumstances. He has a vision of the team he wants, has worked hard to assemble the pieces to make that team a reality, and barring a breathtaking offer is just not going to do anything to jeopardize that vision. It will be very interesting to see how things end up in a month.

Edited by Bird Lady
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TopGunnar said:

Why what? The guys I don’t want to trade would be Cowser, Mayo, Holliday, basallo, and Westburg. I think those guys are future core otioles

You’d do that deal for a 4 era pitcher that’s only here 1/2 a season? He’s only a marginal upgrade over Gibson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

You’d do that deal for a 4 era pitcher that’s only here 1/2 a season? He’s only a marginal upgrade over Gibson

I thought Burned was controlled for more than 1/2 year. In that case, I agree I wouldn’t trade anybody of value for a rental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SemperFi said:

Sorry to be a "downer" but I don't see ME trading for a TOR starter.  Unless he is being coy he stated that "he doesn't like the way the market for starters is panning out"-paraphrased on High Heat.  To me that is the start of a rationalization regurgitated from free agency. 

I'd have to look it up, but I don't remember Elias saying he didn't like how it was panning out. I thought he said something more along the lines of the starters market being difficult to nail down at that point. I could be wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...