Jump to content

Tejada is back and killing us again!


melankfo

Recommended Posts

I know Tejada hit a solo homerun last night, which brought the O's closer to the Redsox, but please note that his previous actions had cost them one run on defense and one run on offense, so his homer did not "make up for it." In an early inning he made a wild throw to first, allowing the runner to advance to second, and he eventually scored. (Though only one error was charged, there was another mental error that also hurt -- he called off Gomez on the ground ball, a big mistake as G. had the angle to get there first and would almost certainly have gotten the out at first, saving Trax pitches, etc.) That's the run he cost on defense.

Oddly, no one seemed to pick up on the run he cost on offense. In a middle inning -- I think the 5th-- the O's had runners at first and third with one out and Tejada hit a grounder to the right of the shortstop, Lugo. Lugo had to go over and backhand it, and it would not have been a double play ball -- except that Tejada as usual loafed down the first base line and was doubled up. Otherwise the O's runner at third would have scored. That's the run he cost us on offense. So he added one run through his homer, and cost us two. Fahey or Hernandez probably wouldn't have homered, but they also probably wouldn't have made the double error (actually) at short, or been doubled up on that grounder. Tejada is back and killing us again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 430
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Ugh....OH's favorite whipping boy is back in full effect.

Yes, this team would be so much better with Fahey or Hernandez at SS. :rolleyes:

Well, it's obvious those 2 aren't as good as Tejada all around. But, they also don't have the expectations he does. And, when he doesn't live up to them, people will criticize him. It shouldn't be a surprise. He isn't hitting for power. He isn't patient at the plate. He hits into a lot of DPs. He doesn't hustle. He doesn't play that great of defense. So, he gets criticized. When you're the highest paid player on a team and you don't perform, this is what happens. No one (I hope) is saying Fahey/Hernandez are better, but we don't expect them to be. This team wouldn't be better with them, but it would be better with the real Miggy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tejada's defense is below par. I stated this before he returned that he should be the DH the rest of the season because his defense is costing the team and helping to create losses in one run games in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tejada's defense is below par. I stated this before he returned that he should be the DH the rest of the season because his defense is costing the team and helping to create losses in one run games in particular.
Keep spitting out lies like Tejada is a below average SS. Eventually they will come true, but it certainly isn't right now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tejada's defense is below par. I stated this before he returned that he should be the DH the rest of the season because his defense is costing the team and helping to create losses in one run games in particular.

This simply isn't true. It's been proven time and time again by every statistical measure out there that Tejada is at least average, and most of the time above average at SS.

When did it become acceptable to make things up out of thin air and pass them off as fact? I respect any and all opinions, but you've got to be able to back them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep spitting out lies like Tejada is a below average SS. Eventually they will come true, but it certainly isn't right now.

I still think tejada has some value however...tejada has an above average arm...but way below average range...it makes him a very average SS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think tejada has some value however...tejada has an above average arm...but way below average range...it makes him a very average SS
His range is below average, but not way below. He gets to more balls in the hole than most SS and obviously has the great arm to make the plays. It may actually just be more positioning than range, as he does play closer to the hole than most b/c he's got the arm to get outs on balls that most of SS watch roll into LF.

And what does very average mean? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got no problem with justified criticism, but Tejada is the latest guy being subjected to made up crap. I agree that Tejada hasn't run hard many times in the past. Last night was not one of those times.

The "called off" Gomez thing is laughable.

I agree with that. I was just stating that I'm not surprised he's the "whipping boy". People want to blame someone for losses like this, and it's easiest to blame the underachieving super star. Does it get overdone? Absolutely. But, it's what happens when the high-salaried star appears to be playing lazy at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His range is below average, but not way below. He gets to more balls in the hole than most SS and obviously has the great arm to make the plays. It may actually just be more positioning than range, as he does play closer to the hole than most b/c he's got the arm to get outs on balls that most of SS watch roll into LF.

And what does very average mean? :)[/quote

lord...very average is just my way of saying how average of a fielder he really is. Look lets be honest...he makes some real stupid plays in the field, but also makes some real nice ones...last night was a great example. He will never become above average in the catagory again, but he still possesses the ability to achieve higher than what he has at the plate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with that. I was just stating that I'm not surprised he's the "whipping boy". People want to blame someone for losses like this, and it's easiest to blame the underachieving super star. Does it get overdone? Absolutely. But, it's what happens when the high-salaried star appears to be playing lazy at times.

If people absolutely must blame someone for losses, how about the players who actually were responsible? I simply get tired of seeing these types of threads after every single loss.

Last night's loss can not be pinned on Tejada. If you must assign blame, look in the direction of Shuey and Parrish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people absolutely must blame someone for losses, how about the players who actually were responsible? I simply get tired of seeing these types of threads after every single loss.

Last night's loss can not be pinned on Tejada. If you must assign blame, look in the direction of Shuey and Parrish.

No you're wrong its somehow gotta be blamed on Trembley, or wait Perlozzo. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oddly, no one seemed to pick up on the run he cost on offense. In a middle inning -- I think the 5th-- the O's had runners at first and third with one out and Tejada hit a grounder to the right of the shortstop, Lugo. Lugo had to go over and backhand it, and it would not have been a double play ball -- except that Tejada as usual loafed down the first base line and was doubled up. Otherwise the O's runner at third would have scored. That's the run he cost us on offense. So he added one run through his homer, and cost us two. Fahey or Hernandez probably wouldn't have homered, but they also probably wouldn't have made the double error (actually) at short, or been doubled up on that grounder. Tejada is back and killing us again.

Not that I want to add to the flames, but even though the Red Sox coverage very well could have showed it differently, the angle that MASN was showing of the play, it really didn't seem like Miggy was running full tilt to make it to 1st. I was hollering at the tv thinking this when I saw the play go down. I am saying this with only seeing the last two seconds of Miggy running to first since they were showing the rest of the play as it unfolded, but this is what I was thinking when I saw it.

That being said, I don't think it was Miggy's fault we lost the game...that solely rests on the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...