Jump to content

Orioles related trade rumors and speculation leading up to the deadline


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, bluedog said:

Giolito went for the #65 overall prospect (according to MLB.com) and a pitcher who's been described as having mid-rotation upside. Robertson went for two prospects who were 20th+ best in the Marlins system. The Dodgers get two starters for a non-Top 100 prospect.

Am I reading this right that teams aren't getting back a ton of value for veteran pitchers thus far?

Exactly… I think Sig’s influence is huge .. I am more of the idea that they are not going to make any deal of more weight than the Fuji deal and maybe zero 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ripken said:

Too rich for me.  Westburg and Kjerstad for a guy with one good year?  Nope.

The guys on The Fan said they'd do that trade all day long.. lol.. Apparently they have some euphemism for prospects that has a negative connotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that the Mets have crossed the Rubicon with the David Robertson sell off, I am just staring at Age 40 Verlander and Age 38 Scherzer.

I know Max is a Union guy, but both guys are to the point in their careers the marginal millions have lower value.    They are Hall of Fame pitchers where the watered down regular season can't offer them much they don't already have.     Any October could be their last.

I don't imagine they have much commitment to the '24 Mets, Cohen gets near 2-for-1 savings on any dollars he sheds, and he can just reload with Snell, Urias, Giolito, maybe Ohtani.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tntoriole said:

Exactly… I think Sig’s influence is huge .. I am more of the idea that they are not going to make any deal of more weight than the Fuji deal and maybe zero 

I think Elias will make some deals, but I think he's not going to move more than 1 of our Top 100 prospects. 

You have to believe that the O's could have gotten Giolito for Norby+ given what the Angels gave up. That tells me Elias isn't shipping out a Top 100 prospect for a rental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fan4Life said:

The guys on The Fan said they'd do that trade all day long.. lol.. Apparently they have some euphemism for prospects that has a negative connotation.

Yeah, I hear ya.  They are just prospects after all and we are going to [very likely] give some up.  That's fine but you still have to get a good return for them.  One top guy for Cease, I'd consider, but not two.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bluedog said:

I think Elias will make some deals, but I think he's not going to move more than 1 of our Top 100 prospects. 

You have to believe that the O's could have gotten Giolito for Norby+ given what the Angels gave up. That tells me Elias isn't shipping out a Top 100 prospect for a rental.

Which is strong belief of Mejdal.. that rentals are always ridiculous value overpays that never work and that only draft and system enable winners 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tntoriole said:

Which is strong belief of Mejdal.. that rentals are always ridiculous value overpays that never work and that only draft and system enable winners 

Sometimes they work - Sabathia, Johnson, and even Doyle Alexander.  I am sure the Cubs would trade for Chapman again.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Now that the Mets have crossed the Rubicon with the David Robertson sell off, I am just staring at Age 40 Verlander and Age 38 Scherzer.

I know Max is a Union guy, but both guys are to the point in their careers the marginal millions have lower value.    They are Hall of Fame pitchers where the watered down regular season can't offer them much they don't already have.     Any October could be their last.

I don't imagine they have much commitment to the '24 Mets, Cohen gets near 2-for-1 savings on any dollars he sheds, and he can just reload with Snell, Urias, Giolito, maybe Ohtani.

You have to think that the Mets would ship both of them out for next to nothing in return for any team willing to eat a big chunk of their salary. If the O's really want to upgrade their staff for a WS run this year without giving up the farm (literally) then this is an option.

And short of a (now impossible) Ohtani trade, its hard to imagine any move(s) that would excite O's fans (and the baseball world in general) more than acquiring one or both of the Mets $43M starters.

Of course - given the O's history this is just a fantasy (until it isn't).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ripken said:

Yeah, I hear ya.  They are just prospects after all and we are going to [very likely] give some up.  That's fine but you still have to get a good return for them.  One top guy for Cease, I'd consider, but not two.

And that's the problem I have with the deal it's bit much unless Cease is going to pitch like he did last season and 2022 might have been his career year rather than something repeatable.

Cease is a good pitcher, but I'd rather get someone like Jordan Montgomery at a lower prospect cost.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluedog said:

You have to think that the Mets would ship both of them out for next to nothing in return for any team willing to eat a big chunk of their salary. If the O's really want to upgrade their staff for a WS run this year without giving up the farm (literally) then this is an option.

And short of a (now impossible) Ohtani trade, its hard to imagine any move(s) that would excite O's fans (and the baseball world in general) more than acquiring one or both of the Mets $43M starters.

Of course - given the O's history this is just a fantasy (until it isn't).

As the Mets don't seem to care about salary, it would actually behoove them to eat a lot of it themselves for a better return.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...