Jump to content

UNC UMD Thread


Floater

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think they can start playing like a team that deserves to be in the NCAA tournament down the stretch.

However, I don't think they can do enough to overcome the huge hole they put themselves in with the Morgan St, Miami, Florida St, and perhaps BC losses (or at least all of them combined, needed to win against Morgan and at least 2 of those ACC games).

Disagree here. They can do enough to get back in. Most teams play their way out of the Dance in February, so if MD can put together a nice run, they could easily slide into the dance, or at least put themselves in a position to get in with an ACC Tourney win or two.

at GT, VT, at CLEM, UNC, DUKE, at NCST, WAKE, at UVA.

First off, they have to win the 3 road games at the bottom feeders. Absolute must wins. They lost any of those 3, and it's over (Unless they do something like win all 3 against the big guys at home, but come on.)

Then, they gotta split the VT/CLEM games. Get 1/2 and I think you are ok.

Then, you gotta beat one of the 3 big boys at home. Just get one of them. Getting one of them, and doing the things I mentioned above, puts you at 8-8 in the ACC, with a win over Mich State and one of the big 3 ACC teams, along with a solid OOC schedule, a nice win over Michigan, and a couple wins over ACC bubble teams (Miami and the VT/Clemson win).

Win your first round game and you are dancing, IMO.

Win against Clemson and VT, PLUS knock off one of the big boys? NCAA.

The interesting thing would be if they can beat VT AND Clemson, but can't beat any of the 3 big guys. They'd be at 8-8, but without the big time win in conference. I think they would need to win 2 ACC Tourney games and get some help in that scenario, but again, MD, if they play like they did for much of the game tonight, can certainly do enough to get a shot at the Dance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Sailor Jerry

Maryland scored 91 points and wasn't even in the game once they got about 6 minutes in. The offense actually looked good but man, UNC hit eeeeeeverything. To get to the tournament, Maryland has a biiiiig hole to climb out of. I'm not sure they can do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UNC showed tonight why they're the best team in the country, but you can't be too pleased about giving up over 90 points to MD at home...the D needs to get better in Chapel Hill.

Have to disagree with you here (about the bolded part).

UNC shot unbelievably well, however had they played some D, they should have won by 40-50. Now I haven't watched much of UNC this year, but if this is their A game, they are a Sweet 16 team. No team is going to regularly shoot 64% behind the arc on a regular basis -- that's just not realistic.

UNC allowed a LOT of fast breaks, and allowed MD to get entirely way too many rebounds and second (and third) chances. Considering how undersized MD is, there was frankly no excuse for that.

Ultimately, lack of defense is what is going to sink the Heels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the sentiment that the Terps actually played pretty well, despite the final score. But I don't agree that the Terps get a free pass on North Carolina's shooting behind the arc. The Terps have allowed too many opponents to shoot the lights out from three this season, and it cost them big time in the Morgan, Miami and BC games.

Why do the Terps have such a hard time defending the three? It seems like there are two possibilities:

(1) The Terps have to double team and sag down low because of their lack of interior size and strength. Inevitably this leads to open looks.

(2) The Terps lack the intensity or defensive awareness to challenge three point shots in a timely way.

I'm not enough of a student of the game to tell which explanation is correct, just based on my viewing of the games. Maybe someone else here could offer some analysis.

A couple of other observations:

(1) Glad to see Tucker getting some playing time and doing something with it. Where the heck has this guy been all season? He was just as promising as Adrian Bowie last year as a freshman but he has been buried on the bench all season. I sure as heck would rather see him playing than Dave Neal, even if it meant having 4 or 5 smallish guys on the floor at once.

(2) Jin Soo Kim really should be redshirting this year. He is built like a whooping crane: tall, long arms but he looks like a strong gust of wind would blow him away. He's not physically strong enough to compete on the inside on either end of the floor right now, and since Gary won't let him concentrate on what he does best right now (catch and shoot) he's not really helping the team at all. It would have been better to let him spend this season in the weight room bulking up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(1) The Terps have to double team and sag down low because of their lack of interior size and strength. Inevitably this leads to open looks.

(2) The Terps lack the intensity or defensive awareness to challenge three point shots in a timely way.

I'm not enough of a student of the game to tell which explanation is correct, just based on my viewing of the games

This is a pretty obvious question to answer.

Just look at it this way:

Despite their struggles, has lack of heart and effort been a problem this season? Or have all the problems all season been just snowball effects of the main problem, the complete lack of size.

I agree with you its nice to see Tucker contributing, he has been terrible all year after being pretty solid last year. He was better than Bowie last season, so it will be nice if he can start bouncing back. If not, I think he'll be on the short list of guys they ask to take their game elsewhere (with Dupree and Burney). Also agree Kim would've been better off redshirting this year, especially so if the academic suspension ends up sticking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the sentiment that the Terps actually played pretty well, despite the final score. But I don't agree that the Terps get a free pass on North Carolina's shooting behind the arc. The Terps have allowed too many opponents to shoot the lights out from three this season, and it cost them big time in the Morgan, Miami and BC games.

Why do the Terps have such a hard time defending the three? It seems like there are two possibilities:

(1) The Terps have to double team and sag down low because of their lack of interior size and strength. Inevitably this leads to open looks.

(2) The Terps lack the intensity or defensive awareness to challenge three point shots in a timely way.

I'm not enough of a student of the game to tell which explanation is correct, just based on my viewing of the games. Maybe someone else here could offer some analysis.

A couple of other observations:

(1) Glad to see Tucker getting some playing time and doing something with it. Where the heck has this guy been all season? He was just as promising as Adrian Bowie last year as a freshman but he has been buried on the bench all season. I sure as heck would rather see him playing than Dave Neal, even if it meant having 4 or 5 smallish guys on the floor at once.

(2) Jin Soo Kim really should be redshirting this year. He is built like a whooping crane: tall, long arms but he looks like a strong gust of wind would blow him away. He's not physically strong enough to compete on the inside on either end of the floor right now, and since Gary won't let him concentrate on what he does best right now (catch and shoot) he's not really helping the team at all. It would have been better to let him spend this season in the weight room bulking up.

You also need to note that most of GW's past teams have benefited from having a weakside shot blocking presence so there was less need to double team-this was pretty much a GW trademark, something that he was willing to sacrifice rebounding for (can't block out if you are trying to block a shot).

He has had to make big changes on the defensive side and has really done a good job disguising many of their weaknesses.

Mack-I think you brought up the roster composition previously. One of the issues with this team is that all their best players are swingmen-small forwards or 2's without range-Milbourne, Vasquez, Tucker, Kim, Mosley, and to a certain extent Gregory and Bowie. Simply not enough minutes to go around. You could actually make the case that their three best players play the same position (Milbourne, Vasquez, Mosley).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mack-I think you brought up the roster composition previously. One of the issues with this team is that all their best players are swingmen-small forwards or 2's without range-Milbourne, Vasquez, Tucker, Kim, Mosley, and to a certain extent Gregory and Bowie. Simply not enough minutes to go around. You could actually make the case that their three best players play the same position (Milbourne, Vasquez, Mosley).
I definitely agree their best players are far too similar. Vasquez and Mosley definitely are both 2's, Vasquez is too wild with the ball to be a 1 and Mosley doesn't have the handle for it. Milbourne I think is great as a 3, although ideally he'd have a bit more range. He is quite deadly from 18 feet and in with the jumper though, he's been the most enjoyable guy to watch all season. If he can go back to the 3 next year, I think he'll have a monster year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a pretty obvious question to answer.

Just look at it this way:

Despite their struggles, has lack of heart and effort been a problem this season? Or have all the problems all season been just snowball effects of the main problem, the complete lack of size.

I agree with you its nice to see Tucker contributing, he has been terrible all year after being pretty solid last year. He was better than Bowie last season, so it will be nice if he can start bouncing back. If not, I think he'll be on the short list of guys they ask to take their game elsewhere (with Dupree and Burney). Also agree Kim would've been better off redshirting this year, especially so if the academic suspension ends up sticking.

Tucker does well when he gets playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tucker does well when he gets playing time.
This isn't a chicken/egg situation here.

He's played pretty poorly even when he's gotten playing time this season, most of it early.

He played great yesterday, and that will get him more playing time, hopefully he can run with it and get back to playing at the high level he showed hints of last year. But don't say that the reason he hasn't played well this year is because of lack of playing time. Its simply not true. He's been pretty mediocre all year long. He's had a couple nice moments, but nothing consistent until last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a pretty obvious question to answer.

Just look at it this way:

Despite their struggles, has lack of heart and effort been a problem this season? Or have all the problems all season been just snowball effects of the main problem, the complete lack of size.

There have been comments from Gary and players after games suggesting that the Terps' effort has been inconsistent at times this season on the defensive end. And even when the effort is there, the Terps may not always be playing smart on defense--Gary commented after the BC game that the Terps struggle on defense when they are on the end of the court away from the team bench, because the coaching staff can't help out with instructions.

Even in past years when the Terps have had better interior defense, it seems to me that 3 point shooting defense has been an issue for this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been comments from Gary and players after games suggesting that the Terps' effort has been inconsistent at times this season on the defensive end. And even when the effort is there, the Terps may not always be playing smart on defense--Gary commented after the BC game that the Terps struggle on defense when they are on the end of the court away from the team bench, because the coaching staff can't help out with instructions.

Even in past years when the Terps have had better interior defense, it seems to me that 3 point shooting defense has been an issue for this team.

Perimeter defense has been a recent issue because they have size but lack perimeter quickness. Hayes and Vasquez specifically have to guard against dribble penetration-especially this year with no established shot blockers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...you didn't watch the game?

I did watch the game, and I agree they played better. However, my point was that it's telling how far we've fallen when we're getting excited about a 17-point loss to UNC.

I'm not saying we shouldn't be encouraged from last night's aberation, but it's hard to argue my main point. But if you want to, it wouldn't surprise me, and have at it. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...