Jump to content

Jack Flaherty 2023


AdamK

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Once he got rolling yesterday he was an ACE. He’s got a lot to pitch for and prove as an upcoming FA. He gives our SP some swagger that they didn’t have before. 

I think we know who is starting Game One. 

I admire the optimism but to anoint him as a Game One starter after 6 innings is a bit silly. 
 

That said, he pitched better than expected yesterday. Very encouraging. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I admire the optimism but to anoint him as a Game One starter after 6 innings is a bit silly. 
 

That said, he pitched better than expected yesterday. Very encouraging. 

Agreed. If he threw bad yesterday I wouldn’t have been upset either. Very encouraged by the start because it’s basically 10 percent of the rental has been great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts:

-his slider and knuckle curve were both quality pitches that got a lot of swing and miss. Don’t feel we have starters that have multiple offspeed swing and miss pitches.

-looks like he is similar to pretty much every other pitcher in history; fastball command to get ahead will dictate his success

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assumed it was the slider that he ha pinpoint control of innings 2-5.  He pretty much was going knee high outside corner and a little further out for the chase.  That pitch was virtually unhittable.   I was pleasantly surprised by the 92-96 velocity as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

This is a really good offseason to buy pitching and I am guessing that the costs will stay down more because of that.

Best pitcher willing to sign for 3 or less years is on the table. Flaherty, because he’s only going to be 28, probably can set himself to get more than 3 years if he ends the year strong.

But he has had durability issues the last several years, so it may be an issue for him to get a longer deal.

Who would you be most excited to land in FA?

For me it's Julio Urias. His slightly elevated ERA this year may keep his price more reasonable and his peripherals still seem near elite to me.

I'd also love to keep Flaherty.

Edited by bluedog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bluedog said:

Who would you be most excited to land in FA?

For me it's Julio Urias. His slightly elevated ERA this year may keep his price more reasonable and his peripherals still seem near elite to me.

I'd also love to keep Flaherty.

Snell is my guy but really, anyone who is taking 3 years or less that has good to very good upside. I don’t want another Gibson/Lyles type guy.

Unless we see a lot of trades or injuries, I think there is only one open rotation spot next year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Snell is my guy but really, anyone who is taking 3 years or less that has good to very good upside. I don’t want another Gibson/Lyles type guy.

Unless we see a lot of trades or injuries, I think there is only one open rotation spot next year.

It will be very interesting to see what the O's do with Means, Kremer, Bradish, Wells & GRod already in the fold. It's not my preference, but I can imagine a scenario (Means pitches really well end of this year and next spring) where Elias goes with that group of 5 starters.

If they do sign a Snell or Urias (or Flaherty) then someone from that group misses out unless they go to a six man rotation. Wells to the pen is a possibility, but given how he pitched up to the last 3 starts, I expect he wouldn't be happy with that role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bluedog said:

It will be very interesting to see what the O's do with Means, Kremer, Bradish, Wells & GRod already in the fold. It's not my preference, but I can imagine a scenario (Means pitches really well end of this year and next spring) where Elias goes with that group of 5 starters.

If they do sign a Snell or Urias (or Flaherty) then someone from that group misses out unless they go to a six man rotation. Wells to the pen is a possibility, but given how he pitched up to the last 3 starts, I expect he wouldn't be happy with that role.

Here’s the thing with Wells, how much can you trust him? The last few years he has gotten hurt and missed time. This year, it’s signs of fatigue at only 100 IP.

You figure this will get better but it’s hard to keep relying on him even if he is good. 
 

I go into next year with the assumption that GRod, Bradish and Means have a spot.

Then you can probably  count on 1 spot from Kremer or Wells and maybe if a guy like Povich or McDermott wow you the rest of this year and in ST, they can beat those guys out. And, of course, we just don’t know what to think for Hall. I know the conventional wisdom at this point is reliever only and that is probably correct but obviously the Os see something with him where they have doubted that. Do they still?  We don’t know but he could play a role here.

So I think it’s one spot for a vet starter with very good upside and there are several of those available this offseason and Flaherty is certainly one of those guys.

 

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Here’s the thing with Wells, how much can you trust him? The last few years he has gotten hurt and missed time. This year, it’s signs of fatigue at only 100 IP.

You figure this will get better but it’s hard to keep relying on him even if he is good. 

I agree, but does Elias? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I saw a blogger saying the O's had Flaherty use his cutter more.  

The PitcherList write up highlighted that too - cutter bump from ~10% to ~30% by their reckoning, but this may be one of those classification things and the (not that big) difference between a cutter and a slider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Just Regular said:

The PitcherList write up highlighted that too - cutter bump from ~10% to ~30% by their reckoning, but this may be one of those classification things and the (not that big) difference between a cutter and a slider.

It could have been more a matter of the opposition instead of a change in his overall approach.

I wouldn't read a lot into one game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...