Jump to content

Return of Buck


Birds08

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

I think Bucks best attribute back then was he gave the kids confidence they were as good as anyone. When players like Manny showed up he already talked about them as one of the best. The time had come for both parties to move on. 

There was no doubt how the culture changed when Buck was hired. He was the perfect person for the job at the time. I’m glad he was one of our guys. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

Watching that game last night, I couldn’t help but feel sorry for Buck.  It’s gotta be deja vu for him, playing out the string with a crappy team, knowing he’s probably gone when the season ends, if not before.   

That play by Marte on O’Hearn’s single was just pathetic.  Does the guy even care?   Meanwhile we’ve got Hays making sliding catches in foul territory while the team is up 7 runs in the 9th.  
 

That was a weird play. My son and the play by play guy thought maybe there was a miscommunication. I was wondering if he was perhaps trying to deke the runners into thinking it would be caught. Marte had a terrible game with his throws as well, Gunnar took two extra bases on him by himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Buck walked Barry Bonds with the bases loaded.   I find his current comments very weak.  He was a good manager.  That night he tried to do something outside the box and it backfired.    He won’t own it all of these years later.   The man’s ego is a lot bigger than people think.

Not sure what Bonds has to do with anything here, but yeah, he walked Bonds with the bases loaded.....and it worked.  Roided Bonds was very possibly the most dangerous hitter of all time.  Would you rather pitch to Barry Bonds (.500 career BA against Olson btw) or Brent Mayne with the bases loaded?

And as far as his ego, you probably don't get to the level of success that he has without it.  Pretty sure ole' Earl was also full of it.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, waroriole said:

There was no doubt how the culture changed when Buck was hired. He was the perfect person for the job at the time. I’m glad he was one of our guys. 

Absolutely. I don't remember the exact record for the rest of that first season, but things changed the day he walked through the door. It was a 180 from day 1.

2012 and 2014 were glorious. Opening day games felt like playoff games. Playoff games felt like WS games. My ears are still ringing from Delmon's double. It was nothing short of magical. Buck pulled everything he could out of the roster he had.....Chris Tillman was our ace for crying out loud. 

As a 43 year old who has witnessed mostly cringey baseball, I'll always be grateful.

Baltimore fans have short memories and are impossible to please. I think there must be some kinda wonky chemical compound in crab mustard that eats away at the brain.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, CP0861 said:

Absolutely. I don't remember the exact record for the rest of that first season, but things changed the day he walked through the door. It was a 180 from day 1.

2012 and 2014 were glorious. Opening day games felt like playoff games. Playoff games felt like WS games. My ears are still ringing from Delmon's double. It was nothing short of magical. Buck pulled everything he could out of the roster he had.....Chris Tillman was our ace for crying out loud. 

As a 43 year old who has witnessed mostly cringey baseball, I'll always be grateful.

Baltimore fans have short memories and are impossible to please. I think there must be some kinda wonky chemical compound in crab mustard that eats away at the brain.

Couldn't have said it any better.  Especially two paragraphs.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Birds08 said:

Also remembering the "cavalry" that was supposedly coming in 2010/2011 [spoiler alert: it never came].  Buck brought us back without our best prospects panning out, at least in the roles we hoped they would.  Matusz, Loewen, Spoone, Erbe, Bergesen, Arrieta, Britton [as a SP] etc

Maybe I'm off here, but I, in my own head, don't include Loewen and Bergesen in our failed prospects list.  "Got hurt, had performance tanked or stopped by said injury, and had to retire from pitching" doesn't have anywhere near the same failure weight to me as a guy who worked his way to the majors and then really didn't get it done after being given a full opportunity at full health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JimGinSP said:

Everybody wants to talk Ubaldo.  I say get Buck to talk about his recruitment trip in the General Lee to Colby Rasmus’ plantation in order to get him to come play here!  Right @Moose Milligan ? (j/k)

I hope Colby Rasmus gets up tomorrow and has to drive 20 minutes to a Chick Fil A, only to get there and realize it's a Sunday.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CP0861 said:

Not sure what Bonds has to do with anything here, but yeah, he walked Bonds with the bases loaded.....and it worked.  Roided Bonds was very possibly the most dangerous hitter of all time.  Would you rather pitch to Barry Bonds (.500 career BA against Olson btw) or Brent Mayne with the bases loaded?

And as far as his ego, you probably don't get to the level of success that he has without it.  Pretty sure ole' Earl was also full of it.

 

 

 

The Bonds thing was an example of thinking outside the box.  I used it as analogy of his going with Ubaldo there instead of Britton.   He would have looked good if Ubaldo held the other team scoreless for 2-3 innings, the O’s score a run and Britton comes in for the save.   That was the strategy. I’ve never killed him for it.  IIRC correctly it looked like our offense would never score again and Ubaldo or someone other than Britton would have had to pitch even if Britton.  
 

My issue with Buck is all of the secret talk now as if someone else screwed up somehow.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorite Buck moment was when Machado got hit by a pitch. Things got very chippy and the dug outs cleared. This was post bat toss. Machado was still young but had developed a bad reputation around the league. Machado went to first and Buck stood in front of him with his arms crossed like a father protecting his son. That image of them at first base is very vivid though I can’t recall the other team. Red Sox maybe?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The Bonds thing was an example of thinking outside the box.  I used it as analogy of his going with Ubaldo there instead of Britton.   He would have looked good if Ubaldo held the other team scoreless for 2-3 innings, the O’s score a run and Britton comes in for the save.   That was the strategy. I’ve never killed him for it.  IIRC correctly it looked like our offense would never score again and Ubaldo or someone other than Britton would have had to pitch even if Britton.  
 

My issue with Buck is all of the secret talk now as if someone else screwed up somehow.

Britton should have been good for two innings in that game — maybe three if he doesn’t throw a lot of pitches. It’s a winner-take-all game, so you got to do things you wouldn’t do in an ordinary game. Buck should have known that. Bringing in Ubaldo before Britton just wasn’t a good strategy even if it was clear what he was going for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The camera cutting to Buck on the railing numerous times were my kid's favorite part of the game last night.

 

(Like this)

image.png.4e6a2a2fc2ebde2c6c4cf2b7db4250b3.png

They didn't have any idea who he was to the Os, but the contemplative seething Buck with the classic head tilt move, where the viewer at home can feel his blood pressure soar... It's like a living meme.

I could've used a few more, actually, like when it seemed the Os were piling it on (McCann's steal) but I think the production team must've stopped out of respect.

 

Edited by AdamK
Looking for gifs
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...