Jump to content

Orioles biggest problem


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Now that everyone in baseball has seen that Mike Elias can take a poor team and build an organization that makes it one of the best, how do the O's keep him?  In the world of baseball money speaks loudly.    If the Mets owner Steve Cohen decides he wanted Elias how much would he send to get him?

I know Elias has said that O's fans will have to put up with him for a while, which I guess means he is under contract.   But will the Angelos' do what is needed to keep him long term?   Will they make him a minority partner if that is what is required?   

Before this year the thought of Elias leaving did not seem that real.   But now the O's winning has elevated the possibility.  Maybe not right now but at some point.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the premise of the thread for sure, but ultimately it's hard to know what drives people.

For many (probably most if we're honest) money is the driving factor, but that's not always the case.

I know Sig in particular made comments when they left Houston that he really enjoyed the building phase.  Once they got to the point where that franchise was good and humming he was looking for the next challenge.

Maybe Elias would prefer to jump to a bigger market with bigger pockets.  Maybe he likes the challenge of working with a limited payroll and working for an owner who seems to be pretty hands off as far as the baseball side goes.  Maybe he just really likes the Orioles.

Tough to know.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Orioles' biggest problem is a creeping concern that Mike Elias might leave for another team at some undetermined point in the future when his contract, of which we don't know any of the details, expires... well, I think the organization is in pretty good shape.

This is similar to the folks who see that the Orioles haven't signed a long-term lease yet, so they've begun to develop a detailed life plan for when the team is playing in Nashville and OPACY is a silent, deserted, windswept ruin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

If the Orioles' biggest problem is a creeping concern that Mike Elias might leave for another team at some undetermined point in the future when his contract, of which we don't know any of the details, expires... well, I think the organization is in pretty good shape.

This is similar to the folks who see that the Orioles haven't signed a long-term lease yet, so they've begun to develop a detailed life plan for when the team is playing in Nashville and OPACY is a silent, deserted, windswept ruin.

Would you root for the Nashville Orioles, just curious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

If the Orioles' biggest problem is a creeping concern that Mike Elias might leave for another team at some undetermined point in the future when his contract, of which we don't know any of the details, expires... well, I think the organization is in pretty good shape.

This is similar to the folks who see that the Orioles haven't signed a long-term lease yet, so they've begun to develop a detailed life plan for when the team is playing in Nashville and OPACY is a silent, deserted, windswept ruin.

I don't see the two as similar.    MLB hasn't let a team move in a long time.  Attendance is on the rise in Baltimore.  The chances of them moving is so slim its almost nonexistent. 

The chances that big money coming after Mike Elias seems more real to me.   You are right.  We have not insight into the length of his contract or his desire to go anywhere else.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Since we know absolutely nothing about how much Elias is paid, how long he is under contract, or how motivated he is to go elsewhere at some point, it’s just not something I worry about.   

What I have seen from Mike Elias is that he knows how to build a winning baseball organization.  I think he will make the hard decisions to trade players for prospects to keep the farm system producing.   Keep the talent coming.   This makes me think that he can keep the team winning for a  long time.

I feel much more confident in his ability to keep the O's winning than I do whether the O's ownership can keep Elias long term.   So the short pole in the tent for keeping the O's winning IMO is not can Elias manage well enough to win long term.  Its will he be with the O's to make it happen in Baltimore.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the other 70-win teams in baseball do as much hand wringing as this board does. Threads about losing Elias, a player somehow not hustling on a triple where he scored the winning run, a thread complaining about how the ballpark isn’t staffed up for the crowds. 
 

I would never come here and tell people how to fan (I’m aware that’s heavily frowned upon around here) but damn, there is not a single tea Iin baseball who can say they have more wins than we do, on August freaking 7th. If you can’t just relax and enjoy this for a bit, what’s the point?

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Now that everyone in baseball has seen that Mike Elias can take a poor team and build an organization that makes it one of the best, how do the O's keep him?  In the world of baseball money speaks loudly.    If the Mets owner Steve Cohen decides he wanted Elias how much would he send to get him?

I know Elias has said that O's fans will have to put up with him for a while, which I guess means he is under contract.   But will the Angelos' do what is needed to keep him long term?   Will they make him a minority partner if that is what is required?   

Before this year the thought of Elias leaving did not seem that real.   But now the O's winning has elevated the possibility.  Maybe not right now but at some point.

IMO Elias would not be the kind of candidate that would be attractive/palatable at all in the New York market.

The type of tear down/tank that he was allowed to oversee he would not be tolerated in New York amongst Mets or Yankees. Ever consumed much of their media? The don’t support losing and especially not over multi-seasons.

While Elias has done a wonderful job of building the org from the ground up, what remains to be proven is if he can successfully guide a sustained period of winning. Friedman didn’t get the Dodgers to come calling right away and neither will Elias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

I wonder if the other 70-win teams in baseball do as much hand wringing as this board does. Threads about losing Elias, a player somehow not hustling on a triple where he scored the winning run, a thread complaining about how the ballpark isn’t staffed up for the crowds. 
 

I would never come here and tell people how to fan (I’m aware that’s heavily frowned upon around here) but damn, there is not a single tea Iin baseball who can say they have more wins than we do, on August freaking 7th. If you can’t just relax and enjoy this for a bit, what’s the point?

I totally agree with all of this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

I wonder if the other 70-win teams in baseball do as much hand wringing as this board does. Threads about losing Elias, a player somehow not hustling on a triple where he scored the winning run, a thread complaining about how the ballpark isn’t staffed up for the crowds. 
 

I would never come here and tell people how to fan (I’m aware that’s heavily frowned upon around here) but damn, there is not a single tea Iin baseball who can say they have more wins than we do, on August freaking 7th. If you can’t just relax and enjoy this for a bit, what’s the point?

You just have to come to peace with the fact that 10-20% of the population is unhappy pretty much no matter what. And they post as much as any other people. I'm absolutely certain there are Braves fans who are beside themselves with how poorly the organization is run.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

IMO Elias would not be the kind of candidate that would be attractive/palatable at all in the New York market.

The type of tear down/tank that he was allowed to oversee he would not be tolerated in New York amongst Mets or Yankees. Ever consumed much of their media? The don’t support losing and especially not over multi-seasons.

While Elias has done a wonderful job of building the org from the ground up, what remains to be proven is if he can successfully guide a sustained period of winning. Friedman didn’t get the Dodgers to come calling right away and neither will Elias.

Yankee fans still sometimes talk about the Alvaro Espinoza years like they were this epic wandering in the wilderness, bleak, dark era that deeply scarred everyone from Newark to Albany for life. That was a four-year period where they averaged 74 wins, followed by making the playoffs like 19 times in 24 years including winning four Series in five years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest concern should be whether Angelos is willing to spend money to extend core young players and supplement with actual quality free agents (and not just 1-yr deals for the Gibson’s and Frazier’s).

Even if Elias/Sig were to leave town tomorrow, the team has so much controllable young talent accumulated that they have a window of competitiveness during the next 4 yrs at least during Rutschman’s rookie contract. The $$$ is going to decide the peaks that the team will hit during that time and whether they can extend that window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

I wonder if the other 70-win teams in baseball do as much hand wringing as this board does. Threads about losing Elias, a player somehow not hustling on a triple where he scored the winning run, a thread complaining about how the ballpark isn’t staffed up for the crowds. 
 

I would never come here and tell people how to fan (I’m aware that’s heavily frowned upon around here) but damn, there is not a single tea Iin baseball who can say they have more wins than we do, on August freaking 7th. If you can’t just relax and enjoy this for a bit, what’s the point?

This

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Welcome.  Hard to hear and it goes fast but I think I got it for the most part.
    • Great job @Ripken with the on the fly transcribing. I think "Jacob" gets the open-ended question award - at least that was the only one in the part I got to hear where Elias chose to name the individual questioner in his answer.     I assume that's Jacob Calvin Meyer. Question was like "When FA opens November 5th, if things go according to plan, will the payroll be higher next year?" Elias used his aplomb to say some stuff about the uncomfortability of "dancing for Jacob", but got to "Yeah".    Then added word salad "upward slope".
    • Rivera performed way above his normal level. I'm sure there's other examples, I was sticking with the Yankees in the example. Your body functions and works differently when it is and isn't under the influence of an adrenaline rush to the point that I would say you're in an altered state where the way your body works and reacts changes and you have to get it under control and adapt to it. Failure to do so means you end up shaking like a leaf and almost lose your motor control. Being able to manage it adequately means you can function pretty much the same as you do any other time and for some people, it takes them to a whole other level. I've experienced all of these personally though not in the circumstances of a professional athlete trying to perform in front of thousands of people as I'm sure many people here could also say. Adrenaline is powerful stuff and is also released with cortisol. They are stress hormones. I think I would define "clutch" as your ability to perform while in the midst of such a state. It's a whole different ballgame pardon the pun. Perhaps it's odd, but that's how I see it basically. I'm used to being odd, so I feel right at home. 😎
    • Yep.  Just total bs. If he can’t handle that, which is less than previous years, we have a real problem.
    • Completely agree on Mateo and his value overall. Hopefully people remember this next season when the inevitable calls for him to not make the roster out of ST, or to be DFA at some point, will be set to begin.    Same with Urias. The value of guys like this has always been clear to anyone who looks beyond one or two stats. Not saying they will hold that value interminably, but there should be a lesson here. There won’t be, but there should be. 
    • I absolutely love Rooker. If Oakland is open to trading him we should be all over it. 
    • The Orioles handling of players like Mayo is very frustrating. It was pretty clear that his future was not at 3B and yet they played him very little at 1B. They keep doing this with prospects and it is really stupid. Mayo should already be an experienced first baseman. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...