Jump to content

Kevin Brown absence explained?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You do realize that whatever the announcer says doesn’t affect what happens on the field, right?

It didn’t bother me at all when Brown pointed out that the Padres hadn’t hit a grand slam all year.   Just like it doesn’t bother me if an announcer points out that a certain player has done poorly with runners in scoring position.

What I tend not to like — and all announcers do this — is when it’s late on the game, the team has the lead, and the announcers start discussing what the consequence of a win will be.  (“With a win tonight, the Orioles would increase their lead over Tampa to three games.”)   I’m a firm believer in not counting your chickens before they hatch, and even though I know that what the announcers say doesn’t affect anything, I get infuriated if things then start heading south.   

So you're cafeteria-style superstitious. That's okay.

The preemptive win chat is literally the exact same thing as the stuff before. In so far as I'd categorize them both as "things ya don't say on TV" as a sports broadcaster. 

It's all in the name of things you don't really want to put out into the universe as to not upset the Baseball Gods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comments in our broadcast that seem to tempt fate do stand out to me too. Mostly from Brown.

Unfortunately, I am a recovering superstitious fan who relapses from time to time. This dragon seems to rear it's head most when my heart gets ahead of my head and I want for an outcome badly. Side note: It's only recently that I have come to the conclusion in life that wanting, of any kind, is the root of most emotional pain. 

 

I guess announcers can't be superstitious... much. I expect the home team announcers to tread very lightly around topics like perfect games and no-hitters (compared to the out of town crew), but for nearly everything else I figure what Brown is doing is queuing up a better soundbite to accompany a play's tape. Setting up the consequence or stat as the pitcher is in his windup is the perfect time for it. 

I don't like it, but it feels like something professional broadcasters are taught to do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

It didn’t bother me at all when Brown pointed out that the Padres hadn’t hit a grand slam all year.   Just like it doesn’t bother me if an announcer points out that a certain player has done poorly with runners in scoring position.

Personally I don't care about the superstition stuff. I care about bad, cherrypicked stats, which is something Brown does too often. At the end of the day I want to hear facts that mean things. I like Brown's relative literacy with analytics but I wish he would have more of the filter that competent analysts would have and not talk about grand slams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AdamK said:

Comments in our broadcast that seem to tempt fate do stand out to me too. Mostly from Brown.

Unfortunately, I am a recovering superstitious fan who relapses from time to time. This dragon seems to rear it's head most when my heart gets ahead of my head and I want for an outcome badly. Side note: It's only recently that I have come to the conclusion in life that wanting, of any kind, is the root of most emotional pain. 

 

I guess announcers can't be superstitious... much. I expect the home team announcers to tread very lightly around topics like perfect games and no-hitters (compared to the out of town crew), but for nearly everything else I figure what Brown is doing is queuing up a better soundbite to accompany a play's tape. Setting up the consequence or stat as the pitcher is in his windup is the perfect time for it. 

I don't like it, but it feels like something professional broadcasters are taught to do.

 

Nothing an announcer says has an impact on the game, you do understand that right? :)

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

You do realize that whatever the announcer says doesn’t affect what happens on the field, right?

It didn’t bother me at all when Brown pointed out that the Padres hadn’t hit a grand slam all year.   Just like it doesn’t bother me if an announcer points out that a certain player has done poorly with runners in scoring position.

What I tend not to like — and all announcers do this — is when it’s late on the game, the team has the lead, and the announcers start discussing what the consequence of a win will be.  (“With a win tonight, the Orioles would increase their lead over Tampa to three games.”)   I’m a firm believer in not counting your chickens before they hatch, and even though I know that what the announcers say doesn’t affect anything, I get infuriated if things then start heading south.   

I mean, yes they can hear us taking to them through the TVs…players included! How do you not know this?!? 😂🤣😎

Kidding, of course.  Those of us that believe in it to whatever extent, being superstitious while watching sports (or playing them) is a real thing.  Does this particular one about what is said in game have any bearing on the outcome of games in either direction?  Hard to definitively answer of course, but there are firm believers in them, so they must have some sort of merit.  Again, whether that’s real or completely intangible, you could debate for eternity. 

So to folks like me, and seemingly many others from the comments, there are certain things that you just don’t say…or maybe should say…depending on the situation.  Whether correlated or just blind luck, I’ll be darned if KB’s “success” rate isn’t pretty high. 

And just to say it, I really enjoy him and all his awkward quirkiness outside of the this one thing. I truly hope this whole mess JA created just goes away and he sticks around for a long time. 

Just keep those unspeakables to yourself please, KB. (I’m sure he’s reading this😂)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom 7 tonight.

Gamel hits fly ball to deep out toward LCF.

KB: “and that’s where balls go to die in this park, especially at night” (maybe not a direct quote but basically that)

Next batter up, Grisham, promptly hits a HR to…you guessed it…left center field. 
 
It is a thing with him and I’m sorry but you cannot tell me otherwise. I’ve watched a ton of sports games across my almost 50 years of life on this earth and I’ve never seen (heard?) anything like it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Wait, are you saying that it's the combined H2H? I guess that does make sense. So, in that circumstance, in a 3 way tie...the Tigers get the #4 seed, the O's #5, and Royals #6?
    • Bubic is really good. Zerpa has a pretty bad K-BB rate on the season though and gives up hard contact, so it looks like that may just be a good stretch for him. His xERA is 4.49 on the season. Lynch is solid but he’s a low K, low BB lefty. Definitely not bad, but he’s going to give up contact.  
    • Yeah, I was tracking #1 overall at some point, not next year. Unless Basallo still has rookie eligibility, I don't see anyone having a chance after next season.
    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...