Jump to content

Could Elias call up our 19-year old SS phenom?


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, CallMeBrooksie said:

If they wanted a shot in the arm, then I just don't see a reason why they wouldn't give Ortiz another shot. If they skip Ortiz in favor of Jackson right now, then it was foolish to hang on to Ortiz at the trade deadline.

Because Holliday is more talented. We are trying to make a playoff run. Put the chips in the center and grab the bull by the horn. Go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, wildcard said:

It would take several injuries to get Holliday to the majors this year.  Ortiz is ahead of him on the call up list and with Urias, Gunnar, Westburg, Mateo and Frazier on the team they are not bringing up Holliday to sit or  get very few at bats.

Holliday wouldn’t be sitting or getting very few at bats if he were called up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SilverRocket said:

We have a logjam in the infield now, and during Manny's year we had -0.7 dWAR Wilson Betemit manning third. Manny had also been in AA the entire year. I don't think this is comparable.

Manny also hadn’t been dominating the minor leagues in the way that Holliday has. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, brucewayne said:

Because Holliday is more talented. We are trying to make a playoff run. Put the chips in the center and grab the bull by the horn. Go for it.

But is Holliday ready to contribute more than Ortiz right now? I vote no. I think Ortiz would out-produce Holliday right now. If you're really putting the best team on the field, then we could use them both. But I don't think that has a chance of happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adding Jackson to the 40 man roster would cost us a player.  I doubt he's on the ML roster before next spring at the earliest.  Probably more like mid summer.  The 40 man roster will require much more difficult decisions this off season than it has in the past as it is.  I doubt Elias wants to make it harder before he has to.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Greg Pappas changed the title to Could Elias call up our current 19-year old SS phenom?

I highly doubt it. Only way I can see it is if Elias wants to take a run at Rookie of the Year next year and wants to give Jackson some MLB experience similar to Gunnar. But Jackson is a year away from where Gunnar was when he came up last year. I think if he wanted to push Holliday up he would have been promoted to Bowie much earlier. He would have to essentially jump from AA straight into the stretch run for the playoffs. And he'd be taking AB's from Westburg and Urias who are having success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

Adding Jackson to the 40 man roster would cost us a player.  I doubt he's on the ML roster before next spring at the earliest.  Probably more like mid summer.  The 40 man roster will require much more difficult decisions this off season than it has in the past as it is.  I doubt Elias wants to make it harder before he has to.

Our 40 man can withstand losing Keegan Akin. He’s out of options for next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

Sorry, WC. I think this is massively flawed thinking. I understand where you're coming from, but this ain't show friends, it's show business. I don't give a flying crap who's paid their theoretical dues ahead of Jackson Holiday. If ME thinks Holiday can come up and produce, then he better do it.

You appear to think that Holliday is immune to the adjustment to the majors that many other O's rookies go through.  That is on the offensive side. On the defense Holliday does not have Gunnars arm or range at this point in his young career.

You sound star struck with Holliday.  I agree Holliday will probably be a star player once he is an established player.   He seem like Bobby Witt Jr to me.   But even Witt had a .216 average in his first 74 at bats.  And the O's do not need that in a pennant race.

Fact is the O's will probably not need Holliday at all this season.  There is probably not be a good reason to start his major league clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CallMeBrooksie said:

But is Holliday ready to contribute more than Ortiz right now? I vote no. I think Ortiz would out-produce Holliday right now. If you're really putting the best team on the field, then we could use them both. But I don't think that has a chance of happening.

Holliday will OPS north of .500

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
    • I can see the arguments for and against.  Gunnar may have had an opinion.  
    • I know I've been a Oriole critic these last few months but many of us have and deservedly so but congrats are really in order for a team that was decimated with injuries especially the pitching staff and still found a way to 90 wins and the playoffs. The first Orioles team with back to back 90 plus wins since the 1982, 1983  teams. Wow.  That's hard to believe. Also back to back playoff teams something the Machado, Jones, Markakis and Wieters led teams couldn't even pull off.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...