Jump to content

Angelos wanted two year lease extension


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Going to be hard to beat OPACY + 600M bribe.

Impossible.  In the end, Napoleon won't get what he wants here (he'll still pocket millions, of course).  I'm sure he'll handle it well and not act like a spoiled brat. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

Could they do what the Braves did and move the O's out of Baltimore city to one of the surrounding counties?

No. They want the city tax dollars to stay in the city. Only other place would be Port Covington or now Baltimore Pennisula but that doesn't  seem probable.T here is land and off of 95 but don't see it. Angelos wants to work out a deal with the Breamble Group who bought  Harborplace and built that up. That is not on top of the stadium and would need some type of bus or overhead pedestrian walkway.Someone even suggested a monorail. Don't see that as working out well 

Edited by Going Underground
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Going Underground said:

Nothing new.Happens all the time. Military bases and defense contracts happen to go to a certain state. A manufacturing plant is built in a state that happens to have a Senator or Congress person lobbying a bill that happens to help that industry.

Yes you're absolutely right, but just because it happens a lot does it mean it's ok or that we shouldn't be upset by it?  JA is using our beloved team to line his pockets and those of his buddies, as well as further his political agenda over the agenda of actually winning baseball games.  That should disgust all of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t find the “former law firm employee” angle all that problematic.  I mean, it’s been 18 years.  Not exactly yesterday.  He’s currently a partner at Venable LLP, which is a well known national law firm that originated in Baltimore.  Nothing to see there IMO.  

My friend is a partner at Venable and he said the guy negotiating the lease is a good guy and they will get this done.   We went to ball game together last week.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, milbest77 said:

Feels like this got leaked as a form of damage control to reassure fans the team is staying…

Leak that they wanted to sign a short term deal instead of a long term deal that was promised as damage control....

Yea, sounds like the type of move John would approve.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they dont have the land nearby are they planning a "imminent domain" seizure?  Didnt people do this in the last two or three decades claiming the need for your land just because they can fund some project which will pay back more tax money?  

I am sure the real reason is Angelos wants to buff the Orioles worth before some sale in the next decade.  How can he maximize their value?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

If they dont have the land nearby are they planning a "imminent domain" seizure?  Didnt people do this in the last two or three decades claiming the need for your land just because they can fund some project which will pay back more tax money?  

I am sure the real reason is Angelos wants to buff the Orioles worth before some sale in the next decade.  How can he maximize their value?  

Seizures sometimes take years to resolve. But looks like the plan is not to build at the stadium but near Harborplace  Things could and well change .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

Seizures sometimes take years to resolve. But looks like the plan is not to build at the stadium but near Harborplace  Things could and well change .

So why is Angelos going nuts over Harborplace?  Thats like 1/4 mile  or more away.  Why does he get to plan that redevelopment?  How is it vital to the Orioles?  

I am just confused.  Maybe I am missing something.  

Edited by Gurgi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, milbest77 said:

Feels like this got leaked as a form of damage control to reassure fans the team is staying…

I don’t find it reassuring at all.  The team is going nowhere in 2024.   A two year extension would be just long enough for Angelos to figure out a Plan B to move the team.  Remember, he had an option to renew the lease for five years, and didn’t execute it.  That would have been an easy way to stall for time while negotiating plans for Camden Crossing or whatever.   But it sounds like Angelos wants a quicker out if things don’t work out to his satisfaction.  No way the MSA should agree to that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

So why is Angelos going nuts over Harborplace?  Thats like 1/4 mile  or more away.  Why does he get to plan that redevelopment?  How is it vital to the Orioles?  

I am just confused.  Maybe I am missing something.  

Angelos wants there to be attractions within an easy walk of the stadium.  That helps attendance.  Makes sense to me.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t find it reassuring at all.  The team is going nowhere in 2024.   A two year extension would be just long enough for Angelos to figure out a Plan B to move the team.  Remember, he had an option to renew the lease for five years, and didn’t execute it.  That would have been an easy way to stall for time while negotiating plans for Camden Crossing or whatever.   But it sounds like Angelos wants a quicker out if things don’t work out to his satisfaction.  No way the MSA should agree to that.  

Plus he can see how the A's relocation is handled.  I don't care what he says about Fort McHenry ,he finds an out and doesn't like how the MSA negotiations are going, good bye 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...