Jump to content

Worried about our pitching.


Natty

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, dystopia said:

In a must win game I’d rather start Bradish than Gibson and I think everyone on here would too.  

Ehh, I can see taking the vet who has been in that situation before.

Their statcast and advanced stats aren’t that far off from each other.

That said, just because you feel that way doesn’t mean fWAR does a poor job of evaluating pitchers. 
 

Either way, it’s close and not really anything to make a fuss over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Ehh, I can see taking the vet who has been in that situation before.

Their statcast and advanced stats aren’t that far off from each other.

That said, just because you feel that way doesn’t mean fWAR does a poor job of evaluating pitchers. 
 

Either way, it’s close and not really anything to make a fuss over.

That's fair but that's not a stat-based decision, it's an experience-based one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I see no reason to think too hard about who our starters would be in a playoff series.  There’s a lot of baseball to play before then.  Let’s see who’s pitching we’ll come tournament time. 

This is where I am. It’s all about who is healthy and who is available in October. 
 

I do think Wells and Means have the potential to be big in October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure..but even stat based, Bradish doesn’t have some large advantage outside of ERA and that doesn’t tell much of the story.

I’d buy that if it were like a half run, maybe full run difference… but when you’re talking almost 2 full runs, it becomes harder for fWAR to be credible here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dystopia said:

I’d buy that if it were like a half run, maybe full run difference… but when you’re talking almost 2 full runs, it becomes harder for fWAR to be credible here. 

Well, first of all, that gets really skewed after yesterday.

Secondly, ERA depends on so many factors outside of the pitchers power. fWAR relies a lot on FIP and FIP focuses on the things that pitchers have more power over and those stats, along with statcast stats and things like that show these 2 pitchers to not be as far apart as you think.

Now, I prefer Bradish too because I think his tough will play up better and of course, he has age on his side but for one big start during this season, I don’t think we have anyone that is a definite pick over anyone else…not as we talk today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pickles said:

He's the defacto number one.  I know his stats aren't sterling, but part of that is because of the workload they  put on him.  We saw it last night.  They'll leave him out there to eat innings and give up runs in ways they wouldn't with anybody else.

I don't know exactly how they'll structure their rotation, and scheduling could play a huge part, but I think my point is dead on: He's more likely to start Game 1 than be taken out of the rotation.

That's because he's old and not part of our future plans. If we throw his arm out in the process then no harm no foul. 

Jack F. and Kyle B are locks for the playoff rotation. If Grayson can keep up the pace he's been on since his return, he would be the top candidate for the 3rd slot. If not its Dean by default. I like Gibson but he was brought in to play the veteran leadership/innings eater role, not to put the ball in his hands in the most crucial moment. At this point he has not done enough to prove otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Wait, are you saying that it's the combined H2H? I guess that does make sense. So, in that circumstance, in a 3 way tie...the Tigers get the #4 seed, the O's #5, and Royals #6?
    • Bubic is really good. Zerpa has a pretty bad K-BB rate on the season though and gives up hard contact, so it looks like that may just be a good stretch for him. His xERA is 4.49 on the season. Lynch is solid but he’s a low K, low BB lefty. Definitely not bad, but he’s going to give up contact.  
    • Yeah, I was tracking #1 overall at some point, not next year. Unless Basallo still has rookie eligibility, I don't see anyone having a chance after next season.
    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...