Jump to content

John Angelos continues to remind us how awful he is


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

I think Boras would strongly advise against any team friendly deal.  Pretty much any agent can arrange something like that. I think Boras is you're agent means one thing only, money.

I think an early extension can be reached with Gunnar, but it has to include an opt out. Players like Gunnar look like a sure thing to hit it big in free agency.

But what if something happens like Gunnar gets a serious injury affecting his play or what if he has a stark decline similar to the one Cody Bellinger suffered? Bellinger went from MVP in his third season to being non tendered by the Dodgers when he hit free agency before his comeback this year.

Perhaps Gunnar will lose out on some free agent money, but he'll lock in security now if he signs a contract extension. This assumes John Angelos makes a good faith attempt to sign Gunnar and not some joke offer like 8/$80M extension.

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

However, something I fear might throw a wrench into things and goes against this idea, is the misunderstood talking point repeatedly posted on this message board about estate taxes. I'm no expert on tax law, but just doing a quick search and having a look at estate tax laws, it would appear that the idea the Angelos's would have to pay a ton of Estate Taxes is incorrect. The reason being is that there is something called "The Unlimited Marital Deduction", and Peter's estate is being passed to his spouse, Georgia. This means that Georgia is not subject to estate tax.

picture-shawshankredemption.jpg?w=640

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

I think Boras would strongly advise against any team friendly deal.  Pretty much any agent can arrange something like that. I think Boras is you're agent means one thing only, money.

What people are missing about some of these players is that often their agents aren’t as experienced and are looking for the payday.  They are afraid they will lose the client to another agent, so they cash in when they can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

 

However, something I fear might throw a wrench into things and goes against this idea, is the misunderstood talking point repeatedly posted on this message board about estate taxes. I'm no expert on tax law, but just doing a quick search and having a look at estate tax laws, it would appear that the idea the Angelos's would have to pay a ton of Estate Taxes is incorrect. The reason being is that there is something called "The Unlimited Marital Deduction", and Peter's estate is being passed to his spouse, Georgia. This means that Georgia is not subject to estate tax.

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/120715/estate-taxes-who-pays-what-and-how-much.asp

 

Never the less, there is still good reason to believe that the Orioles could be under new ownership in approximately 5 years time.

The reason they wait until Peter Angelos dies to sell the team is not to avoid estate taxes but capital gain taxes.  You are correct on that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jabba72 said:

I think Boras would strongly advise against any team friendly deal.  Pretty much any agent can arrange something like that. I think Boras is you're agent means one thing only, money.

I don't think that's always the case. Boras is arguably the best agent in the business, and his agency has built a significant infrastructure to help support their clients. I'm sure Boras clients get top tier attention and perks relative to what other agencies offer. I'm sure there have been some players who just liked knowing they had Boras ready to go to war for them, even if they themselves didn't necessarily intend to prioritize hunting after every last dollar over other factors. Not saying that represents the average Boras client, but I'm sure they're out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I continue to say we have the worst ownership group in professional sports. John Angelos could’ve changed that narrative with the additions of the Elias regime. But, has spoiled that with all of his shenanigans. 
 

John Angelos is clearly drawing down all of the revenue and pocketing it. This pads him and his family long term. The likely goal is probably retaining ownership of the team and/or walking away after a sale with every last nickel that he can in the event the team has to be sold. 
 

Free The Birds!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

The Orioles are only a small-market team because they have small-minded owners. Who are not independently rich and need to make money off the team. This is a storied franchise with a large fan base.

As much as I dislike the Angelos family this post is categorically untrue. The Orioles TV market was split in half when the Expos were allowed to move to DC. The rest of what happened is just colored bubbles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I continue to say we have the worst ownership group in professional sports. John Angelos could’ve changed that narrative with the additions of the Elias regime. But, has spoiled that with all of his shenanigans. 
 

John Angelos is clearly drawing down all of the revenue and pocketing it. This pads him and his family long term. The likely goal is probably retaining ownership of the team and/or walking away after a sale with every last nickel that he can in the event the team has to be sold. 
 

Free The Birds!

The Oakland A’s probably have something to say about that, but that’s about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

You beat me to the post. The more I think about the ownership situation, the more I'm getting a very intuitive feeling that the Orioles will be under new ownership by the time players like Gunnar and Adley get to their free agent years. Let's look at the facts..

  • Peter Angelos is 94 years old.
  • Goldman Sachs was hired just last year, in 2022, to evaluate the Orioles franchise for a potential sale.
  • When under deposition during her son's lawsuit, Georgia Angelos has stated that it was in the family's best interest to place the team for sale.

However, something I fear might throw a wrench into things and goes against this idea, is the misunderstood talking point repeatedly posted on this message board about estate taxes. I'm no expert on tax law, but just doing a quick search and having a look at estate tax laws, it would appear that the idea the Angelos's would have to pay a ton of Estate Taxes is incorrect. The reason being is that there is something called "The Unlimited Marital Deduction", and Peter's estate is being passed to his spouse, Georgia. This means that Georgia is not subject to estate tax.

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/120715/estate-taxes-who-pays-what-and-how-much.asp

 

Never the less, there is still good reason to believe that the Orioles could be under new ownership in approximately 5 years time.

Saw this on the Reddit board.  Don't know if it was posted here or how it applies to billionaires, but it might shed some light on how much the heirs would save by waiting for PA to die.  I know Frobby and others have posted about this before, but this seems a little different.  It may just be the aspect of the super rich not having the same rules.  What the article describes is my experience with small inheritances from my family, but who knows when it involves deep into 9 figures.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/orioles/comments/15xqc74/john_angelos_wont_sell_the_orioles_at_least_in/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are we worried about Scott Boras or whoever is the agent for a certain player? John said he could not sign a player to a contract extension unless raising prices dramatically. So no Ohtani on Opening Day against his former team? I thought Ohtani was  coming here. John said in his spring training interview that Elias and company would handle the payroll and he was there to fund it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wildcard said:

My worry in that Elias does not stay.  As long as he stays with the scouts, develop staff and analytics he can identify  and develop the players to keep a playoff team for years to come.

Without retaining some of the younger/prime players it won't happen. The only team close to what you are describing is Tampa, and they've yet to win a WS. They've made the playoffs 8 out of 15 seasons since they've been "winners". That's not terrible, but I don't know if that's what I would call a perennial playoff team. And even they spend more money than the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Article that explains what you can use the lease money on and what the Ravens plan is on spending the $600 million on. Actually only using $450 million so far. 

 

How the Orioles can spend $600 million if they sign a new lease - The Baltimore Banner
https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/politics-power/state-government/orioles-600-million-lease-IUGTATU4UFCLND2HJBS5UMPO4Y/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
    • LOL, I was worried last year about getting swept in four games by the Red Sox when the magic number for the division was 1. Part of being a fan is imagining the worst case scenario. I would agree it's not likely, though.
    • O's just need to win 1. O's lose home field if they go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0. I actually have no idea what happens if the O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0, and Royals go 3-0. They'd all be 88-74. O's have tiebreaker over the Royals, but not over the Tigers. Royals have the tiebreaker over the Tigers, but not the Orioles. lol Does anybody know what happens in that situation? Does it go to intradivision?  If so, here are their records intradivision: Orioles: 32-20 (.615)  in AL East Royals: 33-19 (.634) in AL Central Tigers: 27-22 in AL Central Interestingly enough, that loss against the Yankees now means the Royals have the intradivision tie breaker. So it does look like there are 2 scenarios where the O's don't get home field: O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0 OR O's go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0/Royals go 3-0. If the Tigers lose, doesn't matter what the Royals or O's do.  I think?
    • Skubal holds Slater to a .000 average/.000 OPS. SSS with only 5 AB's, but he's 0-5 with 0 walks and 2k's. DH vs Skubal = Rivera
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...