Jump to content

Arm injury for Bautista?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Alasdaire said:

 

Is it not plausible that going from Felix to not Felix is the difference in swinging one game in the ninth inning in the playoffs? Is it not plausible that one game in the playoffs leads to being eliminated?

I don't think a metric like WAR tells the whole story here. That's a fine indicator over the course of many games. But in the playoffs, if the closer blows it, the game is over. There's no time within the game or possibly even the series or adjust. I understand this is a squishy thought, but if McCann allows a passed ball in the third inning that Adley wouldn't have, there's a way to recover from that. No such case if the closer hangs a breaking ball.

Plus I would argue the relevance of a closer increases in the playoffs. Unlike the regular season, they can theoretically appear in every game. And the competitive balance is typically tighter in the playoffs, so you would expect more close games that beget their appearing.

Even if you don't think he's the most valuable player, he's not too far down the list.

Look at all the previous World Series winners and show me the ones where their most valuable player was their closer. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Look at all the previous World Series winners and show me the ones where their most valuable player was their closer. 

A better experiment would be to name the closer on the last 10 world series winners right now without looking. You know that would end badly if a person had to answer without using Google. I'm sure in 5 minutes or whatever, someone will have the list and act like they knew it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malike said:

A better experiment would be to name the closer on the last 10 world series winners right now without looking. You know that would end badly if a person had to answer without using Google. I'm sure in 5 minutes or whatever, someone will have the list and act like they knew it.

Yeah. Or they’ll say a team couldn’t win the World Series because their closer went down. 
 

I get that Felix is a weapon but it’s not like we just lost Bradish, Gunnar, Adley or Cedric. We lost a guy who only has value when we’re ahead in the 8th or 9th. 
 

No one can replace the K rate, that’s exceptional. But to act like we can’t find someone else who can’t slam the door in the 9th is ignorant. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Look at all the previous World Series winners and show me the ones where their most valuable player was their closer. 

The issue with losing Bautista is going to be bullpen depth. Now someone like Cano pitches the ninth and now you're forcing DL Hall, Webb or to be determined to pitch high leverage situations in Cano's place.

I'm thinking about Means as closer or late innings reliever at this point or Wells. I just hope they don't get the idea to try out Fujinami in save situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Look at all the previous World Series winners and show me the ones where their most valuable player was their closer. 

Mariano Rivera? Hell... May not have been a World Series winner, but Holland, Davis and Herrera sure dominated the O's in 2014. They gave up like 1 earned run in 14.2 innings. 

Top flight relievers shorten games in the postseason. And our bullpen just suffered the worst setback it could have suffered. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Malike said:

A better experiment would be to name the closer on the last 10 world series winners right now without looking. You know that would end badly if a person had to answer without using Google. I'm sure in 5 minutes or whatever, someone will have the list and act like they knew it.

In fairness, I'd have hard time naming the last 10 World Series winners without Google.  

 

And why do I keep getting a window for apartments.com opening whenever I click the quote button?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Malike said:

I'd like to add we do not have more 1 run wins than anyone else, also. Miami 27-11, Cincinatti 27-25, Milwaukee 26-11, Baltimore 23-11. Philadelphia 23-18.

As a percentage we're tied for third.  Which still doesn't fix the garbage you tried to sell with an out of context stat.  

Edited by Baltimorecuse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The issue with losing Bautista is going to be bullpen depth. Now someone like Cano pitches the ninth and now you're forcing DL Hall, Webb or to be determined to pitch high leverage situations in Cano's place.

I'm thinking about Means as closer or late innings reliever at this point or Wells. I just hope they don't get the idea to try out Fujinami in save situations.

Like two weeks ago, wasn't half the forum freaked out about how Cano had lost it and sucked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...