Jump to content

Eduardo Rodriguez since the trade deadline


Three Run Homer

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

6 starts, 4 quality starts, 4-2 record, 3.50 ERA, 32 K, 12 BB in 36 IP.

That's what we could have had if we had been willing to offer up some real prospects at the deadline.  

Those numbers honestly aren’t all that great. But they are vastly superior to Flaherty, who outside of one start with us has been really bad.

I guess you get what you pay for? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

White Sox, Pitt, Min and Cle..pitched well vs them and Boston and Houston hit him well.

 

Don't add context - that doesn't fit his narrative. Maybe we should have gone all in for Cease -- we could have had his 8+ ERA in August if we were willing to offer up some real prospects at the deadline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Three Run Homer said:

6 starts, 4 quality starts, 4-2 record, 3.50 ERA, 32 K, 12 BB in 36 IP.

That's what we could have had if we had been willing to offer up some real prospects at the deadline.  

why would we want that when we could have 4 out of 5 bad outings from Flaherty? JK. I wonder what level of prospects Detroit was asking for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, baltimoriole said:

why would we want that when we could have 4 out of 5 bad outings from Flaherty? JK. I wonder what level of prospects Detroit was asking for?

It had nothing to do with Detroit. He had a no-trade clause and utilized it. They had a deal in place with LA. 

Edited by TheWall
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AnythingO's said:

ERod publicly stated he would have approved a trade to BAL, BOS and one other team, maybe MIA.

It's odd that they latched onto a trade with the Dodgers when he wasn't willing to go there.

My guess is that the Dodgers offer was a lot better than any other offers that might have been on the table.

Or the Tigers screwed up big time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...