Jump to content

Cool record or who cares?

Sports Guy

By Sports Guy
in Orioles Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

DrungoHazewood Hangout Grand Counsel

DrungoHazewood

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They used to refer to the period beginning in 1901 as the “modern era” of baseball, because that’s when the American Leegue claimed major league status.  I tend to think of that when I think of baseball records.   But I love it when @DrungoHazewoodreminds us of the colorful period before that.  

I know there's a certain simplicity and clarity to that, I understand why people like that cutoff. But I think it's a little lazy to say 1903 is modern while 1897 is some weird, black-and-white past where nothing really counts.

There are legitimate (but mostly, in my opinion unpersuasive) arguments for setting the back-end of real or modern baseball to 1871, 1876, 1893, 1900, 1901, 1920, 1948 and probably several others. I'm comfortable with no set date, and the acknowledgment that the game has significantly evolved with little relief throughout the past 150+ years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

DrungoHazewood
DrungoHazewood

Not only did the Blue Jays beat the Orioles to this, the record is not even true. From 1871-1875 the National Association was the only professional league, and most of those years most of those teams

jerios55
jerios55

Like the Unswept record, I don't think the 'achievement' itself is something to care about. The O's this year haven't had long losing streaks or had teams own them.  As a fan I feel it, because g

Sanity Check
Sanity Check

Here's my spin on how we can frame the accomplishment and separate ourselves from the fact that the Blue Jays also did it, how about: The Orioles are the first team to complete the feat at home,

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Aristotelian
      Looks like the Detroit Tigers

      By Aristotelian · Posted

      Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • wildcard
      Cade Povich 2024

      By wildcard · Posted

      You are such a Rebel.
    • SteveA
      Looks like the Detroit Tigers

      By SteveA · Posted

      Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • LookitsPuck
      Can Cowser still win Rookie of The Year over Gil/Wells ?

      By LookitsPuck · Posted

      I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • LookitsPuck
      Can Cowser still win Rookie of The Year over Gil/Wells ?

      By LookitsPuck · Posted

      Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Just Regular
      Can Cowser still win Rookie of The Year over Gil/Wells ?

      By Just Regular · Posted

      Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • Warehouse
      Looks like the Detroit Tigers

      By Warehouse · Posted

      It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...