Jump to content

Heston Kjerstad 2023


Spy Fox

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Back to Kjerstad, he’s got nice, easy power.  I was listening to a podcast yesterday and the Bowie PA announcer was a guest.  He said what surprised him about Kjerstad when he was at Bowie was how much power he had to the opposite field and the LCF alley.  That was on full display last night with his HR to LF and two long fly outs in the alley (374 and 387 feet).   He definitely shows 35-40 HR potential.   

Nice, easy power is a great description of him so far.  That has impressed me as well.  It doesn't seem like he really got a hold of either of his 2 bombs so far, but out they went anyway.  That's a good omen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

So the big question... Has Kerstad played his way onto the playoff roster? Or is he just a fill in while Mountcastle and Hicks are unavailable? Could Kjerstad make it over Urias, Mountcastle, or Mateo?

If he keeps mashing then he's got a shot. As of today, I don't think they're going to bump any vets off the playoff roster for his sake. It might be matchup-dependent from round to round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

So the big question... Has Kerstad played his way onto the playoff roster? Or is he just a fill in while Mountcastle and Hicks are unavailable? Could Kjerstad make it over Urias, Mountcastle, or Mateo?

He better. If he continues putting the ball in play, he adds a significant threat in the lineup.

I don't think he would need to make it over any of the players mentioned. There is room for all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DirtyBird said:

He better. If he continues putting the ball in play, he adds a significant threat in the lineup.

I don't think he would need to make it over any of the players mentioned. There is room for all of them.

They would have to cut one of them unless they go short on pitchers. Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Mountcastle, Westburg, Frazier, Gunnar, Urias, Mullins, Santander, Hays, Hicks, Mateo, and Kjerstad makes 14.

Especially if we don't have Bautista I think Hyde is going to want to be able to maximize his RP matchups. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Where is the adjustment period that Gunnar, Adley, Westburg went through?

I love what I've seen from the kid.  The easy power, especially to LF, is so obvious Stevie Wonder could see it.

But let's be real: It's been 13 plate appearances.  The "adjustment" period" refers to a much longer period, and it's likely that some struggles await Kjerstad.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

So the big question... Has Kerstad played his way onto the playoff roster? Or is he just a fill in while Mountcastle and Hicks are unavailable? Could Kjerstad make it over Urias, Mountcastle, or Mateo?

The non-so-easy answer is HK's not on the postseason roster and they go with the horses that got them there.  But there's a lot of RHP in the AL playoffs and HK doesn't seem overwhelmed.  So, I think HK has as good a shot as any of the others.

I think they like Mateo's speed and that seals his spot on the postseason even if he's got the lowest floor with the bat. And Frazier's clutchiness and low K% seals his.

Which leaves Urias and Westburg IMO.

Urias is solid all around but not spectacular with any trait.  Experience and better "high leverage" stats.

Westburg has the highest ceiling but the least experience of the non-HK options.  Better numbers against LHP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

That is a very interesting comp. If I might be so bold, what specifically do you see that spurs that comparison? Honest question.

 

Honestly, it's just the blonde hair and physique.  Heston is 6'3 - 220lbs.  Boog was 6'4 - 230lbs in his playing days.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

They would have to cut one of them unless they go short on pitchers. Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Mountcastle, Westburg, Frazier, Gunnar, Urias, Mullins, Santander, Hays, Hicks, Mateo, and Kjerstad makes 14.

Especially if we don't have Bautista I think Hyde is going to want to be able to maximize his RP matchups. 

12 pitchers is plenty for the playoffs. Especially a 5 game series.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I love what I've seen from the kid.  The easy power, especially to LF, is so obvious Stevie Wonder could see it.

But let's be real: It's been 13 plate appearances.  The "adjustment" period" refers to a much longer period, and it's likely that some struggles await Kjerstad.

The 5 K's in 13 AB would definitely suggest that he's got some adjusting to do. And while I think HK has easy power to all fields, it's worth noting that last night's HR snuck into the first row of the cheapest LF in baseball. It's hard not to be happy with the early results though, and I haven't seen anything to move me off my expectation that he becomes a force in the middle of the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, deward said:

The 5 K's in 13 AB would definitely suggest that he's got some adjusting to do. And while I think HK has easy power to all fields, it's worth noting that last night's HR snuck into the first row of the cheapest LF in baseball. It's hard not to be happy with the early results though, and I haven't seen anything to move me off my expectation that he becomes a force in the middle of the lineup.

A couple of those SOs were called 3rd strikes. HK has a very good eye but he isn't going to get the benefit of the doubt from an ump as anewbie. Hell Adley isn't getting that and he has a great eye. They seem to be throwing more off speed to HK so I guess we see if they find a weakness. With his bat speed and eye I don't fastballs will be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...