Jump to content

Garver's Game 2 Single


cboemmeljr

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, NCRaven said:

I believe that CPO is absolutely correct in his description of the rule and how it is applied.  But placing any blame for a horrible throw by Rodriguez on Mountcastle is off base, in my opinion.  Grayson failed to clear the runner and make a good throw.  It was as simple as that.

I said in another post that GRod's only play was to come up firing that ball hard to the bag. So I agree, the bad throw is absolutely on Rodriguez.

I just don't love how Mountcastle positioned himself. He enabled Garver to do what he did and make the throw more difficult. But regardless, that touch pass GRod threw wasn't going to get the job done no matter what. As I was watching it live, once he stood all the way up, I didn't even think he was going to bother throwing it to first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LA2 said:

Buck or the Earl probably would have.

Problem is, the play was completed so the interference can't be called. Unfortunately there was nothing to argue or even talk about.

Earl might've barked a bit, but I doubt it as well as he knew the rules. But I bet he would've been so far up GRod's ass after the game, GRod would've tasted the Brylcream.

Edited by CP0861
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, CP0861 said:

Yeah, I know what "the book" says....give a wide target.

Beyond that, proper is a matter of opinion I guess. If they could run that play back, you'd have Mounty do the exact same thing?

In that situation - best case scenario it's a bang/bang play. I know it's not conventional, but in a bang bang play down the line, I want my first baseman's glove as close to the throw as possible.  With the right foot on the bag, you've got a longer reach to the ball. A RH 1b also has better range pivoting on the right foot in case of a wide throw. The glove is in basically the same spot location (although closer with right foot on bag) regardless of which foot is on the bag, so from the fielder's perspective it's essentially the same throw. Just not the comfy HS textbook visual of looking at 2 shoulders.

There was no time for him to shuffle to his left and then throw. Even if there was, he'd be shuffling to the left to make a throw across to the right. By the time he stopped his 6'5" momentum, he was in foul territory. The ONLY play was to pick it up and fire hard to the bag. If it hits him, that's a good thing.

Also, as obvious as it was, there's a solid shot it wouldn't have been called. Ideally, the home plate ump would be straddling the line looking straight down to 1b, but on that play, he was distracted by the runner coming home and out of position. And it is a judgement call, so no review.

 

Yes, I would have him do the exact same thing. You can't assume a good throw which is why you set up with the left foot on the bag. If he sets up with his right foot on the bag, his lower body is across itself and he can't adjust to a poor throw. He absolutely had time to take a step to the left and clear the runner for the throw. He throws 100 mph. His throw beats that runner everytime. I've knocked Mountcastle for his lack of consistent fundamentals on pick plays all year. He did the exact correct thing on this play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MCO'sFan said:

Yes, I would have him do the exact same thing. You can't assume a good throw which is why you set up with the left foot on the bag. If he sets up with his right foot on the bag, his lower body is across itself and he can't adjust to a poor throw. He absolutely had time to take a step to the left and clear the runner for the throw. He throws 100 mph. His throw beats that runner everytime. I've knocked Mountcastle for his lack of consistent fundamentals on pick plays all year. He did the exact correct thing on this play. 

Ryan did exactly as he was supposed to do.  Bunt drills are done ad nauseum in ST and it's always done the same way for a reason-create muscle memory.  It boggles my mind that others here want him to go across the bag (very dangerous) and create a lane-when he is assuming Grayson will do what he has been drilled to do.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was taught as a catcher to just drill the runner in the back and hope for the out of the base path call when that situation comes up. 

Problem is if it's not called the ball is alive and they can keep running because who knows where the ball will ricochet off to. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...