Jump to content

Jim Callis Os trade ideas


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Which of those ideas do you like?   Are they realistic?

I’d like the Burnes deal if he will extend. But, Cowser is never my replacement CF

Cease deal is too much and he wasn’t good this year. Unless the Os think they have the secret sauce to fix him. 
 

Marlins deal is a yes

As deal is also a yes 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would do the Marlins deal and probably the Brewers deal.   As for the Cease deal, I posted this yesterday so I think Callis is close to what it would take.

The White Sox top prospect, Colton Montgomery, is a SS but he finished in AA last year and might not be ready this year.  Elvis Andrés and even moreso Tim Anderson were bad in the middle.   Gotta figure they’re set with Moncada at 3B, Vaughn at 1B, Jiménez at DH, Benintendi in LF and Robert in CF.  Do they stick with the young Cuban, Oscar Colas, in RF where he really struggled offensively?   They’re light in the rotation and the bullpen.   Norby, Ortiz, or Westburg would all make sense viewed as 2B or SS.  If they don’t believe in Colas, they might be interested in Cowser or Kjerstad.   I imagine people would start getting squeamish if you offered Ortiz and Kjerstad for Dylan Cease.  Westburg and Cowser?   Might have to throw a Povich or McDermott in there.   Too much?  Not enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want Burnes and Devin Williams. 2 years Mullins for 1 of Burnes is pretty even but maybe a slight over pay, but lets build on it if the Brewers want to target Mullins

Burnes, Devin Williams, and Cooper Pratt (#9 Prospect)

for

Mullins, Ortiz, Urias, Stowers, and Norby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

I want Burnes and Devin Williams. 2 years Mullins for 1 of Burnes is pretty even but maybe a slight over pay, but lets build on it if the Brewers want to target Mullins

Burnes, Devin Williams, and Cooper Pratt (#9 Prospect)

for

Mullins, Ortiz, Urias, Stowers, and Norby

They already traded away one Urias. I have the chances at 0 that they’d want Ramon. Stowers has literally zero trade value. Mullins, Ortiz and Norby aren’t getting Burnes and Devin Williams and I don’t love the idea of moving Ced without a viable replacement. As big of an advocate that I am for Cowser, I’d have to know that his challenges with the third deck in ML stadiums is behind him and I don’t see how we could know that until next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Watching the Phillies kid in CF this month makes me wonder how Bradfield would compare to him by next fall.

Even if it is in a role like Jordan Lawlar on the Diamondbacks now, I have a feeling Bradfield will be part of the playoff roster next fall if we're in it and he is still in the organization.

I think if the manager follows the GM to New York, and MIL re-tools for the Jackson Chourio teams, they will lean towards colleagues for Chourio rather than MLB players almost as productive as Burnes.

Bradfield was my first thoughr. Too bad the FO didn't push him a little harder to see what we had in him out of the gate.  He could've rocked a .400 OBP potentially in AA and had a legit chance to make the OD roster like Langford will.

Its not a stretch to think Bradfield can put up a league average OBP (granted with a .100 ISO) with plus defense and elite baserunning on OD 2024, but cant see Elias taking that risk. At the trade deadline, its a different story, Bradfield could make it far easier for us to part with Hays or Mullins.

Although knowing he's close made me entertain the Burnes offer more than I would've thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dystopia said:

LOL that Cease suggestion is a joke. Why do people still treat this guy like the 2nd coming of Cy Young? He is, at best, slightly better than mediocre.

His 3.7 WAR (good for 18th among pitchers, just behind Bradish and just above Burnes) says hello.

Acquiring Cease would upgrade the rotation more than either of the three other deals. And no, I’m not a big fan of Cease but he would instantly become at least the O’s second best pitcher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, nvpacchi said:

Bradfield was my first thoughr. Too bad the FO didn't push him a little harder to see what we had in him out of the gate.  He could've rocked a .400 OBP potentially in AA and had a legit chance to make the OD roster like Langford will.

Its not a stretch to think Bradfield can put up a league average OBP (granted with a .100 ISO) with plus defense and elite baserunning on OD 2024, but cant see Elias taking that risk. At the trade deadline, its a different story, Bradfield could make it far easier for us to part with Hays or Mullins.

Although knowing he's close made me entertain the Burnes offer more than I would've thought. 

It’s a stretch if he doesn’t start hitting for some power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Mullins for Burnes would be a good deal. Maybe Mullins has slightly more trade value with the extra year but it’s close, could be other smaller pieces involved to even it out. I’d play Hays in CF with Cowser in LF, though, at least until Cowser shows capable. Not ideal in that it doesn’t leverage trading from our IF depth and severely weakens the OF defense, but does helpfully open playing time in the OF.

2. Too much for Cease but I think this is what CWS would demand. Which is why a Cease trade won’t happen. 

3. Would do this for Cabrera but I don’t think the Marlins would. Despite being a team with the reputation for “tons of pitching” with Alcantara out next year they’re not super deep in SP beyond a strong 3 (Luzardo, Garrett, Perez). 

4. Norby for Blackburn would be fair but it’s just Cole Irvin part 2. As much as Norby is squeezed out here this just doesn’t move the needle for the Orioles. Unfortunately this is the most likely type of move we’ll see this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...