Jump to content

O's didn't give Red Sox permission to talk to Sig for GM job


wildcard

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If Sig wanted to interview and they didn't allow it, I think it's a loss for the team.  If you are looking for a job and have options why would you pick Baltimore if you know they won't let you advance?

 

As long as we are being hypothetical…while I agree it would be a bad look for the O’s if Sig wanted to at least chat with Boston and was not allowed, no one should be surprised.  Least of all Sig. 

 

I am not really worried about it. I think if he wanted to interview he would have been allowed. The other possibility simply does not make sense even for an Angelo’s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Was a hypothetical situation.

I get it, which is why I left the Sig caveat (his contract was expired too). Plenty of good people have been promoted with this understanding, but I am not privy to any contract terms/extensions and believe Sig was promoted in the last two years.

If the Organization is acting in a nefarious way, I believe those actions will create long-term consequences in a negative way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malike said:

Sig could tweet he wasn't interested in leaving the O's and there would still be another 30 pages coming about how the O's denied him the chance and he was probably lying.

What are you talking about?

I think everyone on here is open to the possibility that Sig had no interest in the job.

This is also a thread that has reached..let me check..all of three pages in the last day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What are you talking about?

I think everyone on here is open to the possibility that Sig had no interest in the job.

This is also a thread that has reached..let me check..all of three pages in the last day.

You've been here long enough to know exactly what I'm talking about. The entire off-season is spent making speculative posts, the fact that this is 3 pages is dumb enough in itself. We love to take stories about nothing and run with them for weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Malike said:

You've been here long enough to know exactly what I'm talking about. The entire off-season is spent making speculative posts, the fact that this is 3 pages is dumb enough in itself. We love to take stories about nothing and run with them for weeks.

I've been around long enough to know that the board isn't active enough at this time of the off-season for a topic like this to get 30 pages worth of traction.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I've been around long enough to know that the board isn't active enough at this time of the off-season for a topic like this to get 30 pages worth of traction.

If I cared enough to do the work, I'm sure I could find more than a handful or 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

If they slow-rolled approval it is absolutely a bad look, I'd say a worse look than outright denying permission.

The industry norm is to allow folks to interview for promotions.

Would you have felt that way if Elias had been denied the chance to interview with the O's?

If the O's are not doing that and not even being upfront about it, yea it could impact the caliber of applicant they get in the future.

Frankly it sound like how Peter did things.

 

 

I missed the part about the delayed response.  Slow-rolling is unprofessional, shouldn't happen and definitely is a bad look.

The industry norm is for permission to be granted for possible promotions, but the societal norm is for contracts to be honored and that is where the emphasis ought to be placed IMO.  I despise the phrase "it's just business" but there are times when it's appropriate and preventing a genuinely key executive from being poached would be one of them.

Elias wasn't under contract when he interviewed with the O's so it's a moot point.  I believe the same was true with Sig but I'm not sure.  If Sig was under contract and prevented from following ME then that would be regrettable but in no way outrageous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

If Sig wanted to interview and they didn't allow it, I think it's a loss for the team.  If you are looking for a job and have options why would you pick Baltimore if you know they won't let you advance?

 

That wasn't the story.  The story was that the Sux wanted something from us and we said no.

I won't speculate on a what if Sig wanted something, but given how I feel about our ownership and whether they would manage to put a crowbar in their wallet if he did, I'm grateful that their answer to the Sux was a simple, "No."

I am on record stating that if there is a pile of sh!t within a country mile of John Angelos he will likely step in it.  For now, he has side stepped it. ;)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, drjohnnyfever1 said:

That wasn't the story.  The story was that the Sux wanted something from us and we said no.

I won't speculate on a what if Sig wanted something, but given how I feel about our ownership and whether they would manage to put a crowbar in their wallet if he did, I'm grateful that their answer to the Sux was a simple, "No."

I am on record stating that if there is a pile of sh!t within a country mile of John Angelos he will likely step in it.  For now, he has side stepped it. ;)

Not only step on it, but then call a news conference and talked about it, most likely after something good happened on the field for his ballclub. But I disgress.

Since we don't know who does what in the FO and it's always described as a "team effort," there is no way of knowing exactly how much Sig has been involved in the Orioles success so far. My inclination is that his Sig-bot computer system has been helpful and that he's a quality part of the FO, but I honestly don't know. 

I do know that unless the system is so secretive that only he knows about it, that Elias has hired a lot of smart people around him so to some extent, some of that Sig knowledge should be disseminated a bit and understood by others. That's not to say Sig is or is not vital to the Orioles success, just that the longer someone works with others, they should in fact become replaceable to some extent.

I get the feeling that Sig is not the "wants to be in charge overall" kind of guy. I think he likes being that "smartest guy in the room" advising moves and staying a bit in the shadows. Now, I could be wrong, but like with any true leadership position, it takes a healthy amount of leadership qualities to pull that off, something Elias has proven he's quite capable of doing at a high level.

As for this situation being anything like the Dan Duquette situation, is apples to oranges in my opinion. In Duquette's situation, the Blue Jays reportedly went directly to Duquette while under contract and offered him a "promotion" and a larger salary which Duquette wanted the Orioles to match. The problem was, this is Angelos we are talking about so instead of making a quick decision and getting a back to business, he was furious at Duquette for even entertaining the offer and then wanted a couple of top prospects in exchange for allowing Duquette to leave.

That process ended up dragging on and the Orioles were frozen in terms of making moves and watched Andrew Miller, Nelson Cruz and Nick Markakis leave while they basically stood pat that main offseason. Duquette then lost his real power in the organization and the three-headed monster developed with Buck and Brady via for behind the scenes influence. This corresponded with Duquette, in a last ditch effort to get back influence and control, making the awful Davies-Parra trade on a team that was going nowhere. 

So no, I don't think these situations are remotely the same. 

Without knowing what really drives Sig or knowing what his ultimate goals are, it's hard to know how this situation will affect him. It's possible he has no desire to leave Elias and the Orioles and maybe together they were like, "Let's slow play the response" in order to leaving the Red Sox on hold a bit before interviewing others? Who knows?

The one that seems pretty obvious is that Elias and Sig seem to be a package deal and with the success they are having, perhaps neither want that partnership to end. 

Saying all of that, while I don't wish to see Sig leave, we are getting the point where Sig's skill sets have not been challenged yet. Can his system identify the right prospects to trade and identify the right players that can get the Orioles over the hump and have success in the playoffs?

All I know is the Orioles were legitimate World Series contenders at the trading deadline and all they did was get Jack Flaherty and Fuji and held onto all of their top trading chips. We've heard that Sig likes to hoard prospects and so far, that's what the Orioles have done despite having a multitude of major league ready prospects blocked in AAA this year. 

This offseason should give us a little bit of glimpse because if this offseason looks anything like last offseason (Gibson, Frazier, Givens, and the trade for McCann) and they go into 2024 with the logjam still vs using some prospect chips to acquire veteran impact players (At least one top Starter, reliever and MOO) then if the team fails again come playoff time next year, we will have question whether the strategy works in October.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were Duquette I'd definitely have some negative feelings towards this organization, he is no longer in baseball and much of that can be attributed to the Orioles ownership and how they treated him.

Personally always thought, when allowed to operate as a GM normally should, Duquette was a good a general manager. I lay those last few years directly at the feet of the Angelos family.

What's Brady Anderson doing nowadays?

Edited by MDS29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They certainly let Ciolek leave but this does have an Angelos feel to it.  Perhaps losing Ciolek made it more difficult to let a 2nd high ranking employee go.  I’m not too concerned about it UNLESS it somehow left Elias feeling unhappy about the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

They certainly let Ciolek leave but this does have an Angelos feel to it.  Perhaps losing Ciolek made it more difficult to let a 2nd high ranking employee go.  I’m not too concerned about it UNLESS it somehow left Elias feeling unhappy about the situation.

Ciolek was not an Elias hire.  He was hired by Duquette.

 Elias, Sig and Holt came over together from Houston.   Those three's relationships run deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...