Jump to content

Injuries happen - 2023 version


Frobby

Recommended Posts

During the 2010’s, I used to track all the games lost to injuries by the teams in the AL East.   In light of various statements that the O’s were fortunate with injuries in 2023, I thought I’d do that same analysis for this year.

Baltimore: 758 games lost to injury (147 for position players, 156 for starting pitchers, 455 for relievers)

Position players: McCann 21, Urias 15, Mullins 46, Mountcastle 32, Hicks 33 = 147

Starters: Means 143, Bradish 13 = 156

Relievers: Tate 162, Givens 83, Akin 83, Perez 13, Voth 67, Coulombe 13, Bautista 34 = 455

Boston: 1,588 games lost to injury (559 for position players, 373 for starting pitchers, 656 for relievers)

Position players: Mondesi 162, Duvall 54, Chang 75, Arroyo 24, McGuire 31, Reyes 40, Story 112, Duran 37, Casas 15, Urias 9 = 559

Starters: Whitlock 69, Bello 26, Paxton 59, Crawford 16, Sale 60, Houck 56, Kluber 87 = 373

Relievers: Mills 162, J. Rodriguez 133, Kelly 143, Martin 23, Schreiber 58, Ort 76, Bleier 51 = 646

New York: 1,835 games lost to injury (521 for position players, 600 for starting pitchers, 714 for relievers)

Position players: Bader 46, Trevino 78, Rortvedt 38, Donaldson 91, Stanton 43, Judge 49, Peraza 13, Bauers 12, Allen 40, Rizzo 54, McKinney 38, Dominguez 19 = 521

Starters: Gil 162, Rodon 111, Montas 160, Severino 69, Cortes 98 = 600

Relievers: Trivino 162, Kahnle 77, Leffross 162, Loaisiga 113, Weber 103, Hamilton 28, Middleton 23, Abreu 21, Misiewicz 13, Peralta 12 = 714

Tampa Bay: 1,236 games lost to injury (163 for position players, 587 for starting pitchers, 486 for relievers)

Position players: Siri 33, Lowe 27, Walls 34, Margot 26, Mejia 26, Raley 9, B. Lowe 8 =163

Starters: Glasnow 53, Baz 162, Elfin 14, Springs 149, Rasmussen 122, Littell 20, McLanahan 67 = 587

Relievers: Armstrong 58, Thompson 14, Fairbanks 30, Cleavenger 126, Fleming 59, Faucher 35, Kittredge 123, Kelly 14, Adam 27 = 486

Toronto: 693 games lost to injury (136 for position players, 108 for starting pitchers, 449 for relievers)

Position players: Espinal 15, Jansen 43, Kirk 8, Belt 21, Bichette 25, Kiermaier 9, Chapman 15 = 136

Starting pitchers: Ryu 108 = 108

Relievers: Green 134, White 64, Cimber 107, Pop 58, Romano 16, Richards 14, Danner 43, Swanson 13 = 449

Obviously, some players are more important than others.  Still, the Blue Jays and Orioles got off very lightly compared to the Yankees, Red Sox and Rays.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tampa's numbers can be put down to just bad luck, but the Red Sox and Yankees have old rosters where it would be a given that they'd lose a lot of games to injuries. With all the kids on our team I'd expect us to lose the fewest (or close to it) games to the IL of anybody in the AL East. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ShoelesJoe said:

Tampa's numbers can be put down to just bad luck, but the Red Sox and Yankees have old rosters where it would be a given that they'd lose a lot of games to injuries. With all the kids on our team I'd expect us to lose the fewest (or close to it) games to the IL of anybody in the AL East. 

I thought the same thing about age, but at least by average age of roster the Orioles and Rays were 28.2 and the Red Sox and Yankees were 28.6 and 28.3, respectively. That’s a head scratcher. Blue Jays average age was 29.6 and Texas Rangers were 29.7. 
 

Maybe there’s more to this once you drill down into the specifics, but at least based on average age of roster it doesn’t look like that explains the days lost to injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ohfan67 said:

I thought the same thing about age, but at least by average age of roster the Orioles and Rays were 28.2 and the Red Sox and Yankees were 28.6 and 28.3, respectively. That’s a head scratcher. Blue Jays average age was 29.6 and Texas Rangers were 29.7. 
 

Maybe there’s more to this once you drill down into the specifics, but at least based on average age of roster it doesn’t look like that explains the days lost to injury. 

Ps. I guess losing old players to injury could actually decrease your average age if they are replaced with really young players. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was something I never wanted to bring up, like bragging about how well your car is running or how much sleep your baby is getting... Talking about it feels like flying too high to the sun.

I never even really counted Means or Tate since they were out from the start, but having them sooner certainly could have helped.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...