Jump to content

Keep one. Trade one.


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

Justification:

Cowser has hit better at every level and much better defender. 
 

Westburg: I believe in the bat. His defense has been better than expected. 
 

McDermott seems to have the less risk. At worst he can fit in the bullpen. Povich’s control is concerning and he’s very inconsistent. One great start then one terrible start. 
 

Hays has two years of control and we need a RH bat with all these LH OF. Plus better defense. Tony is really a DH now. 
 

Basallo’s bat seems special and the potential that he stays at C is the tiebreaker. For Mayo it’s almost all in the power projection. 
 

Urias has some value. Mateo has none. It’s not a tough call. Especially with Gunnar and Ortiz in the organization. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You decide and feel free to give reasons.   For this exercise please don’t say neither.

1. Kjerstad or Cowser

2. Westburg or Ortiz

3. McDermott or Povich

4. Hays or Santander

5. Mayo or Basallo

6. Mateo or Urias

1. Kjerstad

2. Westburg

3. McDermott

4. Santander

5. Mayo

6. Urias

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 24fps said:

Every pairing makes some kind of sense except 5.  Why would you have to choose between Mayo and Basallo?  In my mind both are as close to untouchable as anyone in the minors except Holliday.

Basallo and Mayo might be untouchable.  What’s wrong with having to pick one in a hypothetical situation L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wonder how many votes Cowser would have received if he raked while he was up. Everyone loves to point to a small sample size on this board when downplaying someone’s shortcomings while hoisting up a SSS when someone flashes. 

No doubt that Cowser and Ortiz lack of hitting in a SSS compared to Kjerstad and Westburg is a factor.  I’m guilty as well.   Without knowing what they did at the ML it would probably be a dead heat or edge to Cowser.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wonder how many votes Cowser would have received if he raked while he was up. Everyone loves to point to a small sample size on this board when downplaying someone’s shortcomings while hoisting up a SSS when someone flashes. 

That's fair to say but it's also kind of a No sh, Sherlock thing.

If Cowser had performed while he was up, he never would have gone down.

This wasn't an Ortiz situation.  He was given fairly regular playing time for a while.

When they demoted him, were Elias and Co. being "reactionary?"  Or pointing to a small sample size?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You decide and feel free to give reasons.   For this exercise please don’t say neither.

1. Kjerstad or Cowser

2. Westburg or Ortiz

3. McDermott or Povich

4. Hays or Santander

5. Mayo or Basallo

6. Mateo or Urias

Kjerstad looks significantly better at the plate and Cowser was way more inconsistent on defense than I anticipated.

Westburg also looked better at the plate and appears to be a top-level defender at 2B, which is where I'd leave him most of the time.  I'm for the Henderson-Holliday-Westburg infield.  3B/SS, SS/2B and 2B/3B.

McDermott has the better chance I think of being an impact relief pitcher.  I prefer neither in my rotation plans; I'm imagining these pieces are traded for just that, front line pitching.

Really would like to keep Santander's bat but Hays appeared to learn LF as the season progressed and having someone that can play the new Camden Yards LF well is a harder thing to find, I believe.  Hays may also be cheaper.

Everything points to Mayo having rare power.  Rarer than Kjerstad.  Rutschman is the reason why I take him over Basallo but that requires the team to keep Adley long term, which is what I'd do.

People will probably not like my choice of Mateo but he like Mayo has an elite trait and Urias does not.

So, left hand side all the way down.  Nice exercise.  🙂

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You decide and feel free to give reasons.   For this exercise please don’t say neither.

1. Kjerstad or Cowser

2. Westburg or Ortiz

3. McDermott or Povich

4. Hays or Santander

5. Mayo or Basallo

6. Mateo or Urias

1. Keep Kjerstad trade Cowser 

2. This one is tough for me.   If I have to choose I keep Ortiz

3. Keep McDermott 

4. Keep Hays

5. Keep Basallo

6. Keep Urias

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You decide and feel free to give reasons.   For this exercise please don’t say neither.

1. Kjerstad or Cowser

2. Westburg or Ortiz

3. McDermott or Povich

4. Hays or Santander

5. Mayo or Basallo

6. Mateo or Urias

I would trade Urias and Santander.  Keep Mateo or release based on how things shake out in spring training.

 

Keep everyone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RZNJ said:

No doubt that Cowser and Ortiz lack of hitting in a SSS compared to Kjerstad and Westburg is a factor.  I’m guilty as well.   Without knowing what they did at the ML it would probably be a dead heat or edge to Cowser.

Westburg put up a 1.1 fWAR of which nearly all of it was tied to his defense. I'd bet in the same amount of games Ortiz would have done better, he's a much better defensive player and he's shown he can hit in AAA. If the leash were longer in 2023 I believe he would have outshined Westburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Malike said:

Westburg put up a 1.1 fWAR of which nearly all of it was tied to his defense. I'd bet in the same amount of games Ortiz would have done better, he's a much better defensive player and he's shown he can hit in AAA. If the leash were longer in 2023 I believe he would have outshined Westburg.

I think that’s possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...