Jump to content

Another Exercise - Give it a try


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

Predict, guess, hypothesize, but just play along.   Give me the starting lineup and starting rotation on Opening day 2026  Keep in mind that players like Santander, Hays, and Mullins hit FA before then.  You can guess that someone gets extended.   I’d like to see a 1-9 lineup with position listed.   No trades or FA signings allowed for this exercise.    You can only use players currently in the Orioles system.  It should be interesting to see how you have the defense setup, who you see as the CF, and how you have the lineup setup.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I easily see how Bradfield can hit 9th, but I would love a plus OBP guy with 80 speed sitting at the top of the order.

1. Bradfield - CF

2. Holliday - 2B

3. Rutschman - C

4. Henderson - SS

5. Kjerstad - RF

6. Mayo - 1B

7. Westburg - 3B

8. Basallo- DH

9. Cowser - LF

 

Rotation

1. Rodriguez

2. Bradish

3. McDermott

4. Armbruester

5. Povich

Swing - S. Johnson (not a 6 man rotation, but he gets significant innings still with injuries and the sort)

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Holliday SS

2. Henderson 3B

3. Kjerstad RF

4. Mayo 1B

5. Basallo DH (1B, C)

6. Rutschman C

7. Cowser LF

8. Westburg 2B

9. Bradfield, Jr. CF

 

Rotation

1. Rodriguez

2. Bradish

3. Means (Extended)

4. Seth Johnson

5. Cade Povich

Not a bad starting point at all.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, nvpacchi said:

I easily see how Bradfield can hit 9th, but I would love a plus OBP guy with 80 speed sitting at the top of the order.

1. Bradfield - CF

2. Holliday - 2B

3. Rutschman - C

4. Henderson - SS

5. Kjerstad - RF

6. Mayo - 1B

7. Westburg - 3B

8. Basallo- DH

9. Cowser - LF

 

Rotation

1. Rodriguez

2. Bradish

3. McDermott

4. Armbruester

5. Povich

Swing - S. Johnson (not a 6 man rotation, but he gets significant innings still with injuries and the sort)

I think him leading off is our best case scenario, and would indicate that his bay has made the necessary improvements. Having that speed on base in front of the next few OBP machines would be scary!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assumed Bradfield would debut late 2025 and be in the lineup OD 2026 and with some of the other players, including Holliday, already established that they would ease him into the majors in the non pressure spot of the 9th spot and then his performance would dictate moving into the leadoff spot.   I tinkered with the idea of Jud Fabian or Mac Horvath in the OF for a little more RH balance but they seemed more questionable for OD 2026.

3 rotations listed so far and none include Dean Kremer.  That’s mildly interesting.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to see we're only putting internal options and no improvements from the depth.  I have to think/hope whoever isn't in our lineups will be used somehow (even if it doesn't end in a name on our lists).

 

1 Holliday 2B

2 Rutschman C

3 Gunnar SS

4 Mayo 3B

5 HK RF

6 Basallo 1B

7 Beavers DH

8 Cowser LF

9 Bradfield CF

 

SP1 - Grayson

SP2 - Player X

SP3 - Bradish

SP4 - McDermott

SP5 - Povich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Frobby said:

The OBP in the top part of our lineup could be insane.  

Bottom part too, if Bradfield's OBP skills translate how much fun will it be to watch Holliday hit with the right side open.  You don't hear the axiom "you hit as part of the line up" anymore-but each seems to complement the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basallo as the back up C and splitting time with Mayo at first is a really nice scenario for the Os.

Holliday at SS, Gunnar at third and Westburg or Ortiz at second.  
 

It’s tough to think the team will be completely home grown..I doubt it happens but I will be surprised if the IF isn’t entirely home grown. 
 

This is an exercise that’s fun to think about though because while it’s not likely to happen, the talent is definitely there that it could happen. I just think some guys will be traded to prevent this. 
 

I think the whole Beavers/Cowser/Kjerstad discussion is interesting and I’m guessing some more OFers will be in the mix soon enough.  
 

Bradfield is clearly the heir apparent in CF but he of course he has to develop. My guess is if he isn’t a viable option to see time at the end of 2024 (even if it’s a limited role), he won’t be much of a prospect in terms of being an everyday CFer (assuming he stays healthy)

And by viable option, I don’t necessarily that he is in the majors, just that he has gotten to at least AA and is performing well enough to where you feel you could bring him up if you had to and maybe the speed and defense becomes something you value off the bench if you make the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

Holliday at SS, Gunnar at third and Westburg or Ortiz at second.  

Do you think that Holliday will be a better defensive SS than Henderson or Ortiz, or are you just one of these people who thinks Holliday will play SS “because they didn’t draft him to play 2B?”   If it’s the latter, that’s just stupid.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
    • I can see the arguments for and against.  Gunnar may have had an opinion.  
    • I know I've been a Oriole critic these last few months but many of us have and deservedly so but congrats are really in order for a team that was decimated with injuries especially the pitching staff and still found a way to 90 wins and the playoffs. The first Orioles team with back to back 90 plus wins since the 1982, 1983  teams. Wow.  That's hard to believe. Also back to back playoff teams something the Machado, Jones, Markakis and Wieters led teams couldn't even pull off.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...