Jump to content

Just a Rumor


Tryptamine

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Keygans said:

Good morning....got a non-update update:

Apparently, we might as well put this rumor to rest for now.   Yes, there is an offer and it is from that group, and they do have an "agreement in place"...BUT....they are waiting for PA to leave us before anything happens.   @Frobby might be able to explain, but apparently there are MAJOR MAJOR TAX implications here in terms of estate planning and $$.   PA's health is declining rapidly supposedly so that is why the news is leaking out...if its news at all. 

Please don't shoot the messenger, and I will shut up as to not end up like the other "insiders'' of the past.     Back to the off-season boys. 

I heard this rumor from my barber of all people last week. Then heard it from two people I work with who are not people who make stuff up. I figured like the telephone game it was spreading so I took it with a grain of salt. Then came on and saw this. We shall see but still the tax liability thing gives me pause.Also heard another rumor that the group who put up the  money for  the CFG Arena wants a minority piece of the Orioles. Kevin Durant actually.  Ok,enough rumors for now. Now back to our regularly scheduled hot stove league 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Frobby said:

I put zero credence in this rumor.  Zero.

For one thing, it was only in the last four years that MLB decided to permit investment firms to own a minority stake in a major league team.  So far as I know, investment firms are not allowed to have a majority stake in a major league team.

Now, if an individual who owns all or a large portion of the Carlyle Group, say David Rubenstein, wanted to buy an MLB team, that’s obviously permissible.  But that’s not what this rumor says.  And the part about Peter Angelo’s’ involvement in the decision is not credible.

 

Rubenstein is from Baltimore and went to City College and is a life long Oriole fan. His name has been brought up before in rumors.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If true, which would be some outstanding news. How early does the extra flow of cash impact our signings? We all agree the Orioles can operate at 150 million $ payroll and easily be profitable. I prefer to stick to keeping contracts under 4 years to keep money saved for Adley and Gunnar. Sure would make for an interesting offseason if an influx of cash hit this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

If true, which would be some outstanding news. How early does the extra flow of cash impact our signings? We all agree the Orioles can operate at 150 million $ payroll and easily be profitable. I prefer to stick to keeping contracts under 4 years to keep money saved for Adley and Gunnar. Sure would make for an interesting offseason if an influx of cash hit this team.

I wouldn't bet on an extra flow of cash.

We might see a situation in which the team is purchased and is forced to carry a huge amount of debt.  It's the way these things are done a lot of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s assume for a second that the rumors of an agreement being in place for selling the team after PA has passed are true. 
 

Let’s say you were that buyer, and you had no idea how long it will be until the deal will become available. You also see that the team you’re waiting to buy just won 101 games and is bursting with young talent,  with even more coming soon. 
 

Would you consider improving your agreed purchase price by an amount equal to the increased tax liability in order to facilitate the sale before PA passes? 
 

I’m not saying that’s what’s going on here, but if I was waiting to buy a team that just finished year one of a dynasty period, I might be itching to make the move right away. 
 

When i try to analyze hypotheticals, I measure by how many assumptions are needed in order for the hypothetical to be true. The only assumptions here are that a deal is already agreed to for when PA is gone, and that the new owners are contemplating how to make that deal happen sooner rather than later. The first is the bigger leap. The second isn’t much of a leap at all. If you had a deal in place, you’d be itching to make it happen right away too. 

Edited by UMDTerrapins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

Let’s assume for a second that the rumors of an agreement being in place for selling the team after PA has passed are true. 
 

Let’s say you were that buyer, and you had no idea how long it will be until the deal will become available. You also see that the team you’re waiting to buy just won 101 games and is bursting with young talent,  with even more coming soon. 
 

Would you consider improving your agreed purchase price by an amount equal to the increased tax liability in order to facilitate the sale before PA passes? 
 

I’m not saying that’s what’s going on here, but if I was waiting to buy a team that just finished year one of a dynasty period, I might be itching to make the move right away. 

I get what you are saying but now factor in that you are not a Cohen type worth close to 20B and you are going to have to assume a substantial amount of debt to purchase the team.  Can you afford that type of increase in cost?

If you are viewing this as an investment, and I'm sure they are, it doesn't make sense to me to do it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I get what you are saying but now factor in that you are not a Cohen type worth close to 20B and you are going to have to assume a substantial amount of debt to purchase the team.  Can you afford that type of increase in cost?

If you are viewing this as an investment, and I'm sure they are, it doesn't make sense to me to do it that way.

Can you afford to wait is the larger question. You have a tentative agreement in principle in place based on a value determined at the tail end of a rebuild with still lagging attendance. Let’s say two years from now the team has seen a 25% increase in attendance, won a World Series, and has burned through two more dynasty years with payroll increasing even higher as the young talent starts getting close to their arbitration years. If PA passes then, that price may go up, or other prospective buyers may emerge. There’s an opportunity cost to consider. And there’s the ego part as well. Would you want to miss out on that opportunity to get a ring?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Keygans said:

Good morning....got a non-update update:

Apparently, we might as well put this rumor to rest for now.   Yes, there is an offer and it is from that group, and they do have an "agreement in place"...BUT....they are waiting for PA to leave us before anything happens.   @Frobby might be able to explain, but apparently there are MAJOR MAJOR TAX implications here in terms of estate planning and $$.   PA's health is declining rapidly supposedly so that is why the news is leaking out...if its news at all. 

Please don't shoot the messenger, and I will shut up as to not end up like the other "insiders'' of the past.     Back to the off-season boys. 

Just curious.

1.  Is this clarification of the rumor from the same source that you got the rumor from?

2. So the new owner would be the Carlyle Group not and individual like Rubenstein who just happens to be part of the group?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Going Underground said:

Rubenstein is from Baltimore and went to City College and is a life long Oriole fan. His name has been brought up before in rumors.

We'll ignore the part about him going to Duke.  He's got some interesting stuff on his wiki page and isn't just some trust fund baby that couldn't pass the bar in MD.  He gives alot of money away to charity.  He doesn't seem like he'd be buying the O's to be a hated owner.  Yeah, he'll make his profits.  They all do.  But it seems like he would want to be loved.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Going Underground said:

Rubenstein is from Baltimore and went to City College and is a life long Oriole fan. His name has been brought up before in rumors.

I think he’d be a great owner.   But the rumor reported here is about Carlyle Group, not Rubenstein.   And that’s not possible under MLB’s current rules.  

Rubenstein is an incredibly charitable guy, who has pledged to give away half his wealth.  He does not need the income stream from a baseball team to find his lifestyle.  So, while I wouldn’t expect him to subsidize the Orioles, he doesn’t need to suck profits out of the team the way the Angelos family seems to be doing.  
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that we are all having fun with an off-the-wall rumor, but given the saga about Leonsis wanting to buy the Nationals to add programming for Monumental (after dealing with MASN somehow), this article about possible new money for buying or increasing the funding of professional teams might be of interest.  Note that only certain types of investment groups can be part owners.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2023/11/08/wizards-capitals-qatar-ted-leonsis/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Just curious.

1.  Is this clarification of the rumor from the same source that you got the rumor from?

2. So the new owner would be the Carlyle Group not and individual like Rubenstein who just happens to be part of the group?

1.    Yeah it is.  He finally responded to my question saying basically 'hold your horses' .  He's not sure why it is coming out now unless PA's health is super bad. 

2.    He doesn't know.   It's all legal stuff.   The 'group' owning it has weird legal ramifications like Frobby said but one individual wants it.  

Edited by Keygans
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think he’d be a great owner.   But the rumor reported here is about Carlyle Group, not Rubenstein.   And that’s not possible under MLB’s current rules.  

Rubenstein is an incredibly charitable guy, who has pledged to give away half his wealth.  He does not need the income stream from a baseball team to find his lifestyle.  So, while I wouldn’t expect him to subsidize the Orioles, he doesn’t need to suck profits out of the team the way the Angelos family seems to be doing.  
 

This is all true, and I am not a lawyer, and don't play one on TV.   I suppose it could all be one giant pie sliced into a NUMBER or pieces.  That's how these things seem to work even with the Angelos family.    Rubenstein would be a different breed of owner if is he is indeed the bigger slice of pie.   I dont know about you guys, but I like pie this time of year... especially pumpkin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...