Jump to content

Cease vs everyone else


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, 24fps said:

As for HuskerFan's credibility in general, I simply don't believe in vaguely sourced, quasi-inside information that has popped up out of nowhere on a message board.

I will say this... quasi-inside information popped up on this message board about Ryan Mountcastle being ill (wuith Vertigo) before he was pulled out of the game, citing a source who was a famliy friend. People didn't believe it, but they were right.

Quasi-inside information popped up on this message board 1 month ago about someone from the Carlyle group in talks to buy the Orioles. So far, that has proven to be fairly accurate too. (Although we still don't know the details or specifics because it's still happening in real time. What is likely to happen is a minority stake with a option to buy out the majority after Peter passes, which was also reported in that rumor.)

So far I have been impressed with some of the information I've heard here first before anywhere else.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The Dodgers signings of Ohtani and Joe Kelly are not official yet.  Why?  Their roster is at 40 and they need to make room.  Could the holdup be a 3-1 or 4-1 deal for Dylan Cease?   

And they’ll need to make room for Mateo once we trade him! But seriously, we should trade him to L.A. for a pitching prospect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RZNJ said:

If a deal goes down we’ll find out who the Dodgers best pitching prospect (not most highly rated) is because that’s the one the Rays will get back.

Maybe, but I'd feel better about an Andrew Friedman production than say something with the Reds.

I think the Rays of recent years enjoyed a bump over the normal baseline thanks to the Pirates' silliness with the Chris Archer acquisition.    The Glasnow and Meadows part is about to be over.    Shane Baz is just getting started but he's paid the surgeon now so his chances of being a Glasnow-level performer are less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

Cue the Six Million Dollar Man intro.

And while we're at it, let's ignore all the noise designed to remove any advantage a first-rate FO like the Orioles might have when it comes to research and analysis.  There would be no point in trading for Cease if a team didn't think it could steer his performance back to 2022 levels.  He's going to be expensive, if for no other reason than because that narrative will be repeated often enough to gain some traction.

The fact remains that the O's are best positioned to trade what is required unless CHW decides it wants young pitching that could be used in 2024.  If that's the case then the advantage shifts to the Dodgers IMO.  The only other question in my mind is Elias' willingness to trade more than what most of us think is "fair".  Personally I don't care if the world at large thinks the Orioles didn't win a trade 24 hours after it happened.  Get back to me about 10 months from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

 

As always I look at these reports through the lens of who gains an advantage by it coming out.  If it's an NL executive then this person's team is not trying to get Cease but is trying to drive up the price for a competitor.  Or, and more than likely, it's tied back to the Sox who are still not happy with the offers for him.

I still believe getting Cease is the logical and obvious move for the O's, much in the same vein as Kimbrel.  It seems like the Sox are stuck between what they perceive as his value and what everyone else does.  They were dumb not to trade him at the deadline last year because teams would have gotten three postseasons out of him and now that's down to two.  Unfortunately, though, if they are going to continue to be unreasonable this may not happen.  I would not be surprised if they continue to be stubborn and if they don't get what they want they push this trade to the deadline this year.  Once someone puts their foot in the ground it can be difficult for them to come off it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StottyByNature said:

As always I look at these reports through the lens of who gains an advantage by it coming out.  If it's an NL executive then this person's team is not trying to get Cease but is trying to drive up the price for a competitor.  Or, and more than likely, it's tied back to the Sox who are still not happy with the offers for him.

I still believe getting Cease is the logical and obvious move for the O's, much in the same vein as Kimbrel.  It seems like the Sox are stuck between what they perceive as his value and what everyone else does.  They were dumb not to trade him at the deadline last year because teams would have gotten three postseasons out of him and now that's down to two.  Unfortunately, though, if they are going to continue to be unreasonable this may not happen.  I would not be surprised if they continue to be stubborn and if they don't get what they want they push this trade to the deadline this year.  Once someone puts their foot in the ground it can be difficult for them to come off it.

Agreed.  They asked for too much at the deadline.  The rumors were they asked for Holliday?  What were they thinking.  With Cease being available for three offseasons then, I'm sure we would've parted with one of Cowser/Kjerstad.  

It seems like we've been at a stand off with them since last July.  Now they want the package we offered then.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 24fps said:

There would be no point in trading for Cease if a team didn't think it could steer his performance back to 2022 levels.  

I have zero expectation that we would be able to get Cease back to 2022 levels.   Do you have any idea how good he was that year?   WAY better than Bradish was in 2023 for us.   Sure, getting him back to that is a best case scenario we could hope for.  But to expect that, or close, is foolish.  It’s more realistic to think we can get him back to being the 113 ERA+ he’s been over his career.  That’s how he should be valued in a trade, and anything we get from him beyond that is gravy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...