Jump to content

Pre winter meeting reliever notes


SemperFi

Recommended Posts

Just now, Sports Guy said:

He pitched in 23 games in 2019. He didn’t appear in his first game until late June. In his second and third outings of the season, he gave up 5 runs in 1.2 IP. he then pitched to a 2.3 ERA in his next 17 outings heading into Sept. he got hurt again and ended the month with 2 outings where he got scored upon right after coming back from injury.  So injury and SSS hurt him.

In 2021, he was traded at the deadline to the WS. He came from the Cubs, where he had a .49 ERA in 36 innings..giving up only 1 ER all year up until that point. He went to the WS and threw 23 innings.

He gave up 6 runs in 1.2 IP. He gave up 7 runs in the other 21.1, which is a sub 3 ERA.

So yea, saying he was terrible in those years is factually wrong. He was terrible for a few outings and if you want to say you are worried about him because of the big inning, that’s kind of fair but outside of that, I don’t see much merit for your complaints other than age and relievers really aren’t judged on age. 

I purposely combined 2019/2021 in my post because his total IPed for both years was close to a typical season. Also you trying to play with sample sizes and exclude some of Kimbrel's bad outings to make it appear like he wasn't bad those years is hysterical. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

I purposely combined 2019/2021 in my post because his total IPed for both years was close to a typical season. Also you trying to play with sample sizes and exclude some of Kimbrel's bad outings to make it appear like he wasn't bad those years is hysterical. 

You just aren’t understanding. SSS get skewed by really good or really bad outings. You are just looking at his ERA and saying he was awful.

You are wrong. His ERA was skewed by a few bad outings and the rest of his numbers weren’t too bad. You also aren’t providing context that he had injury issues in 2019.

It’s called presenting the full picture and not being disingenuous with how you try to present your case. 
 

His statcast numbers have generally been very good. His K rates have been good. His K/Bb ratios have been good. His Hr rates have generally been solid. He is missing a ton of bats. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

You just aren’t understanding. SSS get skewed by really good or really bad outings. You are just looking at his ERA and saying he was awful.

You are wrong. His ERA was skewed by a few bad outings and the rest of his numbers weren’t too bad. You also aren’t providing context that he had injury issues in 2019.

 

Oh so if you remove the outing in which he gave up runs his ERA is 0.00.

Makes sense.

He gave up the runs.

He had issues in the playoffs in both 2022 and 2023.

Those things happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Oh so if you remove the outing in which he gave up runs his ERA is 0.00.

Makes sense.

He gave up the runs.

He had issues in the playoffs in both 2022 and 2023.

Those things happened.

Thank you Capt Obvious. As always, your posts bring so much to the conversations.

I never said they didn’t happen but in a season of 65-70 innings, 1-2 innings can greatly skew numbers that are otherwise very good.  This isn’t some difficult concept to grasp, even for you.

And ignoring that and saying that he was terrible when all the other numbers suggests otherwise is as an awful argument and just wrong.

If you are hesitant to go after him because of the playoffs, that’s fine, after all, the motivation behind these signings should be based on the playoffs imo. That being said, if he ran off 3 years of playoff success, it wouldn’t be shocking, just as it wouldn’t be shocking if a player with years of playoff success suddenly struggled.  Again, that’s what happens in SSS.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Thank you Capt Obvious. As always, your posts bring so much to the conversations.

I never said they didn’t happen but in a season of 65-70 innings, 1-2 innings can greatly skew numbers that are otherwise very good.  This isn’t some difficult concept to grasp, even for you.

And ignoring that and saying that he was terrible when all the other numbers suggests otherwise is as an awful argument and just wrong.

If you are hesitant to go after him because of the playoffs, that’s fine, after all, the motivation behind these signings should be based on the playoffs imo. That being said, if he ran off 3 years of playoff success, it wouldn’t be shocking, just as it wouldn’t be shocking if a player with years of playoff success suddenly struggled.  Again, that’s what happens in SSS.

You are the one that makes posts that require me to state the obvious.

Your post was bad and you should feel bad.

Everyone here understands the concept of Small Sample Size.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You are the one that makes posts that require me to state the obvious.

Your post was bad and you should feel bad.

Everyone here understands the concept of Small Sample Size.

 

I don’t think they do. If they did, they wouldn’t state that so and so was terrible despite everything saying they aren’t, outside of a few bad outings.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I agree that it's a longshot. Mostly because this team/ownership has shown no intention of signing that kind if talent due to the years and money it takes. Relievers can be volatile, but Hader has that special kind of talent that only an injury can derail.

Imagine a Bautista/Hader backend of the bullpen in 2025 and 2026? 

I would love Hader but its more than a longshot, but it Flunks on years and average salary per year. I do have confidence (unlike many others here) JA will increase payroll as revenues increase, but were  not there  now if ever, the contract hes is expected to get is NYY, LAD Texas Rangers ETC Not us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Oh so if you remove the outing in which he gave up runs his ERA is 0.00.

Makes sense.

He gave up the runs.

He had issues in the playoffs in both 2022 and 2023.

Those things happened.

I haven’t even looked at Kimbrel’s game logs, but I do think you need to look at how a pitcher arrived at his ERA.  Some guys pitch well most of the time but have the occasional bad meltdown, other guys are consistently mediocre.  

If you look at Kimbrel’s ratio of shutdowns (33) to meltdowns (11) last year, it’s not elite, but it’s not bad.  He was 14th on the shutdown list, and had a better ratio than 4 of the pitchers ahead of him.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If they bring in someone like Kimbrel I want better than not bad.

The Dodgers left him off their playoff roster.  He got demoted this year in the playoffs.

I'd rather they go somewhere else.

The Orioles don’t tend to bring in “better than not bad”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If they bring in someone like Kimbrel I want better than not bad.

The Dodgers left him off their playoff roster.  He got demoted this year in the playoffs.

I'd rather they go somewhere else.

It’s tricky if you’re really looking for a one-year solution.  Really good pitchers generally require a longer commitment.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Doesn't cost the team anything to declare interest in a player.

THIS!  I've been interested in pretty girls before that I knew I'd never get.  Same thing here.  Can't hurt to declare interest and if one of them says, I really want to be in Baltimore and will consider taking less, then things just got interesting.  I don't see that happening, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...