Jump to content

Winter Meetings Thread


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

If it is Kimbrel, for me he'd be fundamentally similar to Adam Frazier in this way.

Arguably, the Adam Frazier outlay will help cost contain Westburg-Ortiz salaries in the medium term.

Arguably, a Craig Kimbrel outlay would help cost contain Cano-Hall salaries in the medium term.

To the extent we're all watching the organization for a signal whether current ownership is open to investing more money in the on field product, Kimbrel alone for me would not be it.    I do believe at the mile-high level some demonstration of competitiveness with money would be helpful to ongoing efforts to buying FA seasons from one or two of the team's most talented players.

Looking at the full 3-year sample since covid, Kimbrel among ~200 qualified RP is 10th in fWAR, 57th in ERA, 13th in k-bb and 37th in Stuff+.     His Savant FB Velo 3-year percentile trend is 90-81-80.    

Is he a Hall of Famer?    Billy Wagner career is 900 innings of 187 ERA+.    Kimbrel is now at 750 innings of 171 ERA+.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Would he be OK with being the set up guy for Cano?

If he's not hard set in the Closer role this looks a bit better to me.

 

I think the selling point of racking up saves on the all time list probably gives us an advantage here.  If he comes here... he's the closer.  Cano really struggled in the 2nd half.  He was starting to stall out just before the all star game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Kimbrel is a good move to get us through 162, but shouldn't be viewed as the "stopper" "fireman" that Bautista was.  He's going to blow some saves and probably give up runs sometimes in extra innings.  Bautista was such a weapon in extra innings, and he really propped up Cano in the 2nd half.  Bautista stranded alot of Cano's runners.  

Kimbrel leads me to believe we're not going to pay the price for Luzardo/Cease.  

Kimbrel has absolutely zero to do with what they do at starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Would he be OK with being the set up guy for Cano?

If he's not hard set in the Closer role this looks a bit better to me.

 

I don’t see much of a difference.  Someone else will close if it’s 3 days in a row or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Would he be OK with being the set up guy for Cano?

If he's not hard set in the Closer role this looks a bit better to me.

 

Maybe.  I believe he started his PHI tenure as a set up guy for Alvarado.

I agree with the set-up preference, but think he'll be the closer FWIW.  (Though I tend to lean toward no closer and play the match-up/game situation in general anyway.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there's a handful of games in April and May we have to live with being blown until he gets removed from the role. Given his veteranosity and the likely dollar commitment, probably best to root for him to be really putrid early and force our hand to get him banished to lower leverage.  If he manages just mediocre for a while he'll still be in high leverage roles in the critical parts of the season and we'll end up with him blowing key games down the stretch.    Being a fan of this franchise is exhausting some times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming this is a one year deal, I think it makes sense. Cano showed he isn’t a closer and it’s probably too much to expect Wells or Hall to step into that role. Not saying they can’t, it’s just dangerous to make any assumptions. Personally, I think Wells would do great in that role though. Kimbrel is cool too I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Would he be OK with being the set up guy for Cano?

If he's not hard set in the Closer role this looks a bit better to me.

 

He wants closer money, not setup money.  Plus, do we really trust Cano in this role for a year?  His swing and miss stuff tailed off a bit last year as the season progressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Would he be OK with being the set up guy for Cano?

If he's not hard set in the Closer role this looks a bit better to me.

 

I think it'd be a mistake going into the year thinking Cano is going to close.  As great as he was last year, his numbers are skewed by an other-worldly start.  I expect he's more of the guy we saw in the second half.  Still good, but not dominant.

Kimbrel makes a ton of sense.  It's not exciting but he adds stability to the pen and allows Cano to be in a lower-leverage spot which suits him better.  I will admit I can't stand that weird stance that Kimbrel does and he has struggled a bit with the pitch clock.  I'm not looking forward to watching him but I completely get the rationale.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kimbrel got 1/10 last year coming off of a worse season... This year he's coming off of a better season (FIP is weird these past two years though... The Philly defense propped him up a bit)... So, I imagine he'll get something like 1/12 or maybe a little more. I'd love to see a team option for a second year, too. (Since it's an option it needs to be more... so like another $18m if we pick it up. So, I'd be cool with 2/30 with the second year as an option... might have to do a $2m buyout, but that's cool.)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sanity Check said:

He wants closer money, not setup money.  Plus, do we really trust Cano in this role for a year?  His swing and miss stuff tailed off a bit last year as the season progressed.

I didn't say that I would have Kimbrel set up and Cano close.

I asked if he would be willing to come into the season as something other than the designated Closer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...