Jump to content

MLB Offseason Moves/Rumor Thread


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Oh that’s interesting. I wish we hadn’t settled with everyone. Especially Mateo and OHearn. 

I don't understand why O'hearn gets so much hate on this message board. It's like these people never witnessed the success of the 2024 season.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I don't understand why O'hearn gets so much hate on this message board. It's like these people never witnessed the success of the 2024 season.

It's really not that complicated.  He has a career .714 OPS.  Yes, it was .801 last year, BUT that was largely due to a great .867 OPS in the first half, while falling much closer to his career norm in the 2nd half, it being .756 OPS.  Then in August he has a .710 OPS and a .724 in Sept/Oct.  For me at least, I largely question who O'Hearn is.  Is he the guy who had a May/June/July of .937, .867 and .893?  Or did he simply have a SUPER 3 month hot streak, and then revert back to what he'd been for most of his career?  

I'm glad he helped the team so much in 2023.  But I'm not counting on him repeating his scorching hot 3 month run again in 2024, in fact I think it MUCH more likely we get a .700-.725 out of him.  

2023 was a magical year, but we also had a TON of things go right, including some journeymen like O'Hearn/Mateo get REALLY hot and carry the team at times.  Expecting them to repeat that in 2024 is as unlikely as Mullins regaining his 2021 production level.  We don't 'hate' O'Hearn, per se, we just aren't sold that he's someone we should pencil in for 300-400 at bats.  Not when we have more talented players waiting in the wings that would likely outproduce his career type numbers.  I hope O'Hearn has a VERY short leash this year.  

Edited by forphase1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I don't understand why O'hearn gets so much hate on this message board. It's like these people never witnessed the success of the 2024 season.

He’s not homegrown. It’s the same thing with Mate and Urias. We’re not at the point yet to have all homegrown position players. We don’t want “prospects” that are still growing to be bench guys. Next year we may have all 13 position players be home grown. Back up C will be the hardest. Handley or Basallo. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

He’s not homegrown. It’s the same thing with Mate and Urias. We’re not at the point yet to have all homegrown position players. We don’t want “prospects” that are still growing to be bench guys. Next year we may have all 13 position players be home grown. Back up C will be the hardest. Handley or Basallo. 

Who cares about them being homegrown?  It's about them having talent, or not, not about what team drafted or developed them.  I don't hear anyone complaining about McCann or Burnes, or saying they should be replaced by 'homegrown' guys immediately.  O'Hearn, Mateo and Urias just aren't that good.  THAT'S why I want them gone or on a VERY short leash.  It has nothing to do with them not being 'native' to the Os organization.  Geez.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, forphase1 said:

Who cares about them being homegrown?  It's about them having talent, or not, not about what team drafted or developed them.  I don't hear anyone complaining about McCann or Burnes, or saying they should be replaced by 'homegrown' guys immediately.  O'Hearn, Mateo and Urias just aren't that good.  THAT'S why I want them gone or on a VERY short leash.  It has nothing to do with them not being 'native' to the Os organization.  Geez.  

Ryan O'Hearn had a .289 Average, an .801 OPS, 60 RBIs, 14 HRs, and 100 all in part time platoon work in 2023. If he had played full time that translates to All Star numbers. He was the only player in our lineup to carry the offense during some games. He's better than you're giving him credit for.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Ryan O'Hearn had a .289 Average, an .801 OPS, 60 RBIs, 14 HRs, and 100 all in part time platoon work in 2023. If he had played full time that translates to All Star numbers. He was the only player in our lineup to carry the offense during some games. He's better than you're giving him credit for.

His track record prior to 2023 strongly suggests that his results last year are an outlier and that he isn't actually that good. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, deward said:

His track record prior to 2023 strongly suggests that his results last year are an outlier and that he isn't actually that good. 

The Royals have been an inept organization recently, so keep that in mind. The O’s fixed some things with his swing, plus no shift helped. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, forphase1 said:

...

2023 was a magical year, but we also had a TON of things go right, including some journeymen like O'Hearn/Mateo get REALLY hot and carry the team at times.  Expecting them to repeat that in 2024 is as unlikely as Mullins regaining his 2021 production level.  We don't 'hate' O'Hearn, per se, we just aren't sold that he's someone we should pencil in for 300-400 at bats.  Not when we have more talented players waiting in the wings that would likely outproduce his career type numbers.  I hope O'Hearn has a VERY short leash this year.  

You do realize we also had a lot of things go wrong too, and still won 101 games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some confidence in OHearn because he hits the ball hard and it wasn’t just 2023 either. Throughout his career he has had high Ev, barrel and hard hit%. He isn’t a huge strikeout guy and his chasing numbers haven’t been bad in his career.

He has less than 1450 PA in his career, going back to 2018. He averages an extra base hit every 12 PA.

Just to compare him to a few guys, Santander averages an XBH every 17 PA. Mountcastle is every 15 PA.

He has, generally speaking, been awful vs lefties in his career but surprisingly, he has 3 years of a sub 700 OPS vs righties.

The Bb rate was good his first 3 stints/years in the majors but awful since.

It’s hard to pinpoint exactly what has gone wrong vs righties. The batted ball stats are strong but his xBA is not.

Im good with him on the team to start. I don’t think you can really rely on him but I also think there is plenty there and plenty was shown last year to say, he should be here and he should play vs righties often until he shows last year was more of a fluke. I wouldn’t hesitate to give him a quick hook though. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dystopia said:

The Royals have been an inept organization recently, so keep that in mind. The O’s fixed some things with his swing, plus no shift helped. 

But did we?  His numbers tumbled again in August and September.  Did we suddenly unfix his swing?  Or did they put the shift back in and I missed it?  All I'm saying is last year was a mixed bag... he had a few months where he was really good and hot and a few months where he was the same as when he was with the Royals.  Which is the real O'Hearn?  Or a mixture?  I don't think he has nearly enough of a track record of being good for us to count on him being a .800+ OPS hitter this year.   I'd love to see it,  but I far from expect it even think it's going to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

But did we?  His numbers tumbled again in August and September.  Did we suddenly unfix his swing?  Or did they put the shift back in and I missed it?  All I'm saying is last year was a mixed bag... he had a few months where he was really good and hot and a few months where he was the same as when he was with the Royals.  Which is the real O'Hearn?  Or a mixture?  I don't think he has nearly enough of a track record of being good for us to count on him being a .800+ OPS hitter this year.   I'd love to see it,  but I far from expect it even think it's going to happen. 

How many hitters put up .an 850 OPS every single month? That’s not how baseball works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

But did we?  His numbers tumbled again in August and September.  Did we suddenly unfix his swing?  Or did they put the shift back in and I missed it?  All I'm saying is last year was a mixed bag... he had a few months where he was really good and hot and a few months where he was the same as when he was with the Royals.  Which is the real O'Hearn?  Or a mixture?  I don't think he has nearly enough of a track record of being good for us to count on him being a .800+ OPS hitter this year.   I'd love to see it,  but I far from expect it even think it's going to happen. 

How many guys on the roster, or in contention for a roster spot, do you count on for an .800 OPS for the season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...