Jump to content

MLB Offseason Moves/Rumor Thread


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Just saw BA has Thorpe 58. Highest I have seen him ranked. 

I'm pretty sure someone there said Thorpe might be better than Cease this year. Thorpe has like 30 innings at AA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

This.  They have insane talent at MLB level and MiLB level. 

Well, they did, but now Soto, Snell, and Hader are gone, so that probably costs them about 10 wins. This move doesn’t make much sense from their end. They’re the fourth best team in the division. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I'm guessing that Elias wasn't willing to give up one of Cowser/Kjerstad/Westburg.  If he was, CWS were just stupid.

I don't know.  I mean he has to trade somebody soon.  There are too many position players and not enough pitching.  Dylan Cease was clearly the top arm to be had by trade, at least of the pitchers known to be available.  Now who do the O's trade and for whom?  I hope we don't have to wait all the way until the trade deadline to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I'm guessing that Elias wasn't willing to give up one of Cowser/Kjerstad/Westburg.  If he was, CWS were just stupid.

I don't know.  I mean he has to trade somebody soon.  There are too many position players and not enough pitching.  Dylan Cease was clearly the top arm to be had by trade, at least of the pitchers known to be available.  Now who do the O's trade and for whom?  I hope we don't have to wait all the way until the trade deadline to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, EddeeEddee said:

I don't know.  I mean he has to trade somebody soon.  There are too many position players and not enough pitching.  Dylan Cease was clearly the top arm to be had by trade, at least of the pitchers known to be available.  Now who do the O's trade and for whom?  I hope we don't have to wait all the way until the trade deadline to find out.

Rumors were they were asking for Westburg and it was a no go for Elias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Well, they did, but now Soto, Snell, and Hader are gone, so that probably costs them about 10 wins. This move doesn’t make much sense from their end. They’re the fourth best team in the division. 

If Os signed Soto, Snell, Hader do you think we’d win 111?  

They have talent at MLB and in their system.  Kudos to them for trying to win.

The Dodgers are leaps and bounds ahead of every team in MLB, should the other 29 just fold? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

If Os signed Soto, Snell, Hader do you think we’d win 111?  

They have talent at MLB and in their system.  Kudos to them for trying to win.

The Dodgers are leaps and bounds ahead of every team in MLB, should the other 29 just fold? 

If we were a 100 win team before acquiring those players, then absolutely. Soto was 5.5 rWAR, Snell 6.0 and Hader 2.4.

I said they were the FOURTH best team in their division. It seems crazy to me to jettison those 3 players and then make a move like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, dystopia said:

If we were a 100 win team before acquiring those players, then absolutely. Soto was 5.5 rWAR, Snell 6.0 and Hader 2.4.

I said they were the FOURTH best team in their division. It seems crazy to me to jettison those 3 players and then make a move like this. 

They were incredibly unlucky last year.  I imagine they will be in the thick of it this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Malike said:

I'm pretty sure someone there said Thorpe might be better than Cease this year. Thorpe has like 30 innings at AA.

lol. Yea I saw that stupidity.

They spent the whole offseason saying how great Cease is and now a top 75ish prospect is all of a sudden just as good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And yet some on here think they are going to make him a UTI guy right now.

Problem is the rules don't let you start 6 infielders yet.

Westburg may very well be good enough to be an every day 3B or 2B or SS but we have other elite guys that are gonna challenge him for those slots.  Either on March 28th or not long thereafter.

So by this summer it is entirely possible he could be a "backup" for us by default right?

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And yet some on here think they are going to make him a UTI guy right now.

It is kind of absurd that that the three guys that might end up in front of Westburg are former #1 overall prospects and whatever Mayo ends up ranking. Just a wealth of riches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...