Jump to content

What about Mayo?


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

I would love to know what kind of offers Elias has received for Urias.  It is so easy to say trade Urias so we can play these young guys but he is such a great option to have on your roster.  He can play multiple positions and play them really well, he seems to get timely hits and not bothered by inconsistent playing time.

I just think Elias views Urias as a lot more valuable than other teams value him in trade capital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barring injury 8 of the 13 position players are a locks including: Gunnar, Mounty, O'Hearn, Adley, McCann, Hays, Mullins and Santander.  To me a lock is a player that could have a bad spring and still make the team.

The last 5 position players could be any of 8 players including:  Westburg, Holliday, Mayo, Cowser, Kjerstad, Urias, Mateo or Stowers.

Most likely McKenna, Maton, Nevin and Hilliard who are  on the 40 man roster and out of options will be DFA'd and put on waivers to try to get them to AAA  around opening day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

I would love to know what kind of offers Elias has received for Urias.  It is so easy to say trade Urias so we can play these young guys but he is such a great option to have on your roster.  He can play multiple positions and play them really well, he seems to get timely hits and not bothered by inconsistent playing time.

I just think Elias views Urias as a lot more valuable than other teams value him in trade capital.

I think that’s true. Os fans treat him like he’s pretty worthless imo but he has value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Barring injury 8 of the 13 position players are a locks including: Gunnar, Mounty, O'Hearn, Adley, McCann, Hays, Mullins and Santander.  To me a lock is a player that could have a bad spring and still make the team.

The last 5 position players could be any of 8 players including:  Westburg, Holliday, Mayo, Cowser, Kjerstad, Urias, Mateo or Stowers.

Most likely McKenna, Maton, Nevin and Hilliard who are  on the 40 man roster and out of options will be DFA'd and put on waivers to try to get them to AAA  around opening day.

Unless Westburg goes 0 for spring, he’s a lock. Urias and Mateo are locks too. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good problem to have all of these defensive and offensive possible alignments.  Trying to fit these pieces into a 162 game lineup and have all of them ready to perform in October will be a season long ongoing function.  Mayo, like Holliday offers a tremendous upside.  There is more talent lower on the farm.

It really is a fun time.  The questions of whether Mayo or Holliday are ready and what they could be if they perform as expected are luxuries we could only dream of 5 years ago.  

And yes, we do not value guys like Mateo and Urias enough.  I'm not saying they could bring back tremendous value in a trade.  But when you have guys like that who are essentially placeholders who could perform nearly everyday if needed...there is no question that has value.

So far, we have gotten some nice work from pitchers too.  Still early however so like most, I am still worried about both starting and relief pitching for the long haul.

But I am optimistic in spite of the early injury info and looking forward to what this season holds.  I have a ticket package for the first time in almost 10 years.  Everyday is like Christmas....I come downstairs and peek in here to see what is going on today.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I think that’s true. Os fans treat him like he’s pretty worthless imo but he has value.

Per BB-ref, he’s been worth 7.4 rWAR in 321 games, compared to Anthony Santander’s 7.9 rWAR in 591 games.  Yet a lot of folks treat Santander as untouchable and Urias like he’s a replacement level player.  (fWAR has it 4.6 for Urias, 6.9 for Santander, which still leaves Urias ahead in WAR per game.)

Now, I do understand why most people consider Santander the more valuable of the two despite these numbers, but my point is, Urias is hardly a replacement level player.   He’s a very solid contributor.   The O’s should be able to get back decent value if he’s traded.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Per BB-ref, he’s been worth 7.4 rWAR in 321 games, compared to Anthony Santander’s 7.9 rWAR in 591 games.  Yet a lot of folks treat Santander as untouchable and Urias like he’s a replacement level player.  (fWAR has it 4.6 for Urias, 6.9 for Santander, which still leaves Urias ahead in WAR per game.)

Now, I do understand why most people consider Santander the more valuable of the two despite these numbers, but my point is, Urias is hardly a replacement level player.   He’s a very solid contributor.   The O’s should be able to get back decent value if he’s traded.  

People have this belief that homers and power numbers are the only way you can help a team. It’s really annoying to me.

Excellent post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the Burnes trade, the Orioles can’t really go wrong with whatever they decide to do with the numerous position player options. Ortiz had a ton of AAA time, was worthy of a shot as a starter at the MLB level, and had no future as a starter in the organization (unless they were to trade Westburg instead). The only players in remotely similar positions now are Norby and Stowers, and they aren’t close to the level of prospect that Ortiz is.

The Orioles could send all the big “ready” prospects - Holliday, Mayo, Cowser, Kjerstad - back to AAA to start the year and have enough MLB depth that they could be ok, and those 4 have not spent so much time in AAA that they couldn’t benefit from more time there (not a full year, but perhaps a few months). Or they could call some combination of them up, or trade some of the veterans to make more space, or trade prospects themselves. Sending them down would be good for control, but if they’re calling them up they’re only doing it in scenarios where it helps the team win now (and take a shot at the ROY comp pick).

I have my own preferences and I think certain options are better than others, but there are positives and negatives to whatever path forward they end up with. And ultimately all of them are a “good problem” to have with this amount of young talent.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Obviously, an injury to a starting infielder, including Mountcastle.  Even an an injury to Hays or Santander could potentially open a spot for Mayo.  Otherwise, I have no idea who he might replace or how he fits in.  But if he looks like the best hitter on the team he’s not going down for long and maybe not at all.

Your theory is that Holliday has to have a really bad spring to not make the team, but Mayo has to look like the best hitter on the team to make it. I would be disappointed if management had that much bias going into spring and used that logic.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Your theory is that Holliday has to have a really bad spring to not make the team, but Mayo has to look like the best hitter on the team to make it. I would be disappointed if management had that much bias going into spring and used that logic.

Defense is part of the equation I didn't mention.  Mayo has a higher bar offensively because of the perception that Westburg, Henderson. Holliday is the better defensive alignment than any with Mayo at 3B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully Norby is back to playing in games soon.  This is a big spring training for him, it sucks to see him start it with a nagging side injury, although it sounds like he is back to taking BP.

Even if there is no room in Baltimore for him, this spring training would be a great platform to show other teams what he can do against MLB level competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RVAOsFan said:

I would love to know what kind of offers Elias has received for Urias.  It is so easy to say trade Urias so we can play these young guys but he is such a great option to have on your roster.  He can play multiple positions and play them really well, he seems to get timely hits and not bothered by inconsistent playing time.

I just think Elias views Urias as a lot more valuable than other teams value him in trade capital.

He's a darn good player, for sure.  7.4 rWAR over 1050 ABs.  He brings a lot to the table.  Seems like an ideal candidate to get some decent low-level talent in return.  Still waiting for them to start making those types of moves.  It's started to get crowded in the Baltimore infield.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Yep..unless traded but neither Urias or Mateo are getting cut.

Can't say that I know how this turns out.   Its appear right now that Mayo 3B, Gunnar SS, Holliday2B is the future.   So what happens to Westburg, Urias, Mateo, Norby and Stowers is undecided IMO.

Elias traded Mancini for Johnson and McDermott.  Lopez for Cano and Povich.

We have not seen any trades to enhance the minors yet but there may be some comings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

Barring injury 8 of the 13 position players are a locks including: Gunnar, Mounty, O'Hearn, Adley, McCann, Hays, Mullins and Santander.  To me a lock is a player that could have a bad spring and still make the team.

The last 5 position players could be any of 8 players including:  Westburg, Holliday, Mayo, Cowser, Kjerstad, Urias, Mateo or Stowers.

Most likely McKenna, Maton, Nevin and Hilliard who are  on the 40 man roster and out of options will be DFA'd and put on waivers to try to get them to AAA  around opening day.

O'Hearn is probably a lock, but he shouldn't be. I'm not counting on him to repeat last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
    • Nail hit on head. It really comes down to the offense in the playoffs for us. I think our pitching is good enough overall especially the starters. Shaky sometimes sure, but they can hold their own most of the time. If we don't bring our "A" hitting game in the playoffs we won't go far.
    • The bullpen has warts for sure, but if this offense doesn't figure out how to hit good pitching in the playoffs, the bullpen won't matter. Even I got a little excited when they put 5 and 9 up on the board Tues and Wed, and then it crashed back to reality last night when I remembered they were facing Schmidt and Stroman. When facing a real ace like Cole they were completely shut down. What's gonna happen next week when they face Skubal, Reagins, and/or Lugo? The mediocre bullpen won't matter if they can't figure out how to score some runs off pitchers like that...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...