Jump to content

What about Mayo?


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, deward said:

O'Hearn is probably a lock, but he shouldn't be. I'm not counting on him to repeat last year.

I don’t think that is unreasonable to think he will have regression   But he is going to get the chance to repeat his season. I think he is a lock to make the team. But if he has much regression there are other ways to use his at bats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, foxfield said:

I don’t think that is unreasonable to think he will have regression   But he is going to get the chance to repeat his season. I think he is a lock to make the team. But if he has much regression there are other ways to use his at bats. 

Yea I can’t see them eating his salary before the season even starts. (Well 80% of his salary)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EERinthe804 said:

I wouldn't be shocked to see Mayo make the OD roster and Holliday start in AAA.  If Mayo has a nice spring and Holliday doesn't - it will be interesting.

My hope coming into ST was that one of Mayo or Holliday would crack the opening day roster, we really don't have room for both right now. Even if just one makes the team, that will probably mean one of Urias or Mateo has to go.

 

Trade Urias for a reliever and let Mayo cook!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, foxfield said:

I don’t think that is unreasonable to think he will have regression   But he is going to get the chance to repeat his season. I think he is a lock to make the team. But if he has much regression there are other ways to use his at bats. 

Oh, I have no doubt that they're going to give him 200 PA before they give up on him, I just think he's a lot more likely to be the guy we saw in Aug/Sep than he is the guy from Jun/Jul. I'd much rather give those at bats to Kjerstad or Cowser, were it my decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, The B&G said:

My hope coming into ST was that one of Mayo or Holliday would crack the opening day roster, we really don't have room for both right now. Even if just one makes the team, that will probably mean one of Urias or Mateo has to go.

 

Trade Urias for a reliever and let Mayo cook!

I agree entirely. Trade at a somewhat relative high. Heck, he’s a gold glover. It’s Mayo time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, deward said:

Oh, I have no doubt that they're going to give him 200 PA before they give up on him, I just think he's a lot more likely to be the guy we saw in Aug/Sep than he is the guy from Jun/Jul. I'd much rather give those at bats to Kjerstad or Cowser, were it my decision. 

This doesn’t really change your point, but I was reminded on the Sunday radio broadcast that O’Hearn actually was having a very good September (.959 OPS in 18 games) until he suddenly finished the season 0 for 23.   His OPS for the season dropped by 54 points in those final 8 games.  Ouch!

I think your assessment is correct that they will give him 200 PA before changing his usage in case of poor performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Coby Mayo is showing up and being consistent in Spring Training so far! He's raising his stock even higher, in my opinion.

I think there’s only so high your stock can rise in ~10 spring training PA in the first week of games.  He’s certainly getting people’s attention.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think there’s only so high your stock can rise in ~10 spring training PA in the first week of games.  He’s certainly getting people’s attention.  

Also coming off a September in AAA where he OPS’d 1.065 at 21 years old

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

That’s all well and good but why does the one coming up have to be Holliday and not Mayo?  Why is Holliday more deserving?  Just because he’s the better talent?  That answer may be enough but I’m just kind of playing devils advocate here.

Mayo has more AAA time and has been a high end player for most of his MiL career. 
 

 

I don’t think it has to be Holiday either. I don’t understand why Elias is so hesitant to purge the roster.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t think it has to be Holiday either. I don’t understand why Elias is so hesitant to purge the roster.

Because he’s not sure the young players will be ready to be better than the older players they’d be replacing in 2024, and he’s trying to win in 2024, with a group of guys that helped win 101 games in 2023.   It’s not like he’s replacing the guys who lost 110 games in 2019.   

I’m not saying Elias shouldn’t or won’t make some changes.   I’m explaining why he’s hesitant and has kept his options open. 
 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t think it has to be Holiday either. I don’t understand why Elias is so hesitant to purge the roster.

Why TF would you "purge" a roster that's coming off 101 wins?

Like what's the mentality behind that?

  • Upvote 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...