Jump to content

What about Mayo?


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

I’m not sure where you are getting this from when Elias’s only comment was that Mateo will get more reps at CF this spring. That does not mean he will be the backup CF.

I would bet Cowser gets double the starts at CF than Mateo. Hays might get more starts than Mateo there too, and he only started 5 games there last season.

I think we’d be hearing about how well he’s doing in CF if it was even remotely true. I don’t see Mateo getting many CF innings this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The reality is that this team should be able to have many of the young players on it and rotate a lot of guys around so that several guys are getting 400ish at bats but very few get into the 600 range.

I don't disagree at all.  Who do you want getting 600 at bats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't disagree at all.  Who do you want getting 600 at bats?

Gunnar. I don’t think anyone else that definitely makes the team should be in position to play 155+.  If Mullins is healthy and hitting lefties reasonably well, he perhaps enters this discussion. He would be the next guy for me.

And to be clear, someone(s) may establish themselves as a guy to get 600+ at bats. This is more of an entering the season plan but one that can be altered. Just depends on the development of the young players And/or the health/performance of the vets.

Note: Mayo and especially Holliday may be guys I would put down for that too but I’m skeptical if they will or even should make the OD roster, especially Holliday. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Gunnar. I don’t think anyone else that definitely makes the team should be in position to play 155+.  If Mullins is healthy and hitting lefties reasonably well, he perhaps enters this discussion. He would be the next guy for me.

And to be clear, someone(s) may establish themselves as a guy to get 600+ at bats. This is more of an entering the season plan but one that can be altered. Just depends on the development of the young players And/or the health/performance of the vets.

Note: Mayo and especially Holliday may be guys I would put down for that too but I’m skeptical if they will or even should make the OD roster, especially Holliday. 

That's about right and we agree on all points.  Gunnar was the only guy I'd think of who should get 600+ at bats without question.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

That's about right and we agree on all points.  Gunnar was the only guy I'd think of who should get 600+ at bats without question.  

I think Adley should.  He had 687 last year.  Fine with me to get him a bit more rest, but not 87 at bats’ worth.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

The reality is that this team should be able to have many of the young players on it and rotate a lot of guys around so that several guys are getting 400ish at bats but very few get into the 600 range.

I suspect that next year will be year where we truly only have a vet bench guy at backup C. Urias, Mateo, and O’Hearn, are good depth to help win over 162 this year. Or at least the first half of the season. In a perfect world, Elias could flip all three for the best prospect deals he could find and then use their 2024 salaries to sign one of Clevinger/Lorenzen. 

As for Mayo specifically, I’d love to see him get ABs this year at 3B/DH/COF. I think he has a path to playing time even with Westburg. Urias probably would have to go. 

The solution to our pitching injuries could be to just ride with Holliday/Mayo and score more runs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

Looking forward to see how they handle Norby. Wonder if he gets any starts in the OF 

Gotta figure he does. He has a potential to be a right platoon bat for us. Just gotta figure out where he can be serviceable in the field. 
 

There is enough hit tool there that 300-400 at bats is probably worth it for him if his defense doesn’t kill you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...