Jump to content

What about Mayo?


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I have no idea how they will be able to look him in the eyes and tell them he's going back to AAA. He looks not only ready, but looks ready to be an impact hitter. 

Mayo needs to be the everyday 3B. Whether you send Holliday back to AAA, or send Urias away for what you can get, or make Westburg a super sub, or what, but he needs to be starting at 3B on opening day. 

The home run he hit was so far the LF took two steps and then became a spectator himself.

Yessir… that thing landed far, far away. His swing is sheer violence.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Elias and Hyde are going to have some tough decisions to make for the Opening Day roster. If Mayo, Stowers and Holliday keep hitting it’s going to be hard to deny them a roster spot. Kjerstad looks ready too and there’s also Norby. Spring Training trades don’t happen often, but it would be nice to trade some of this position talent for pitching. 

I don’t think there is one available, but a veteran plus bat at 1B/DH is at least worth considering. 

The O's have too many mlb ready bats.  The last thing they want to do is sign another one.  I feel like a trade of Westburg/Urias is almost a necessity.  Mayo looks ready.  Mayo is probably going to be better than any bat we can sign by the end of the year.  I'm not a big believer in Stowers in a small spring training sample size vs his minor league career.  He will likely be a high K/low OBP7good power guy who will struggle to hold a spot in the majors.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

The O's have too many mlb ready bats.  The last thing they want to do is sign another one.  I feel like a trade of Westburg/Urias is almost a necessity.  Mayo looks ready.  Mayo is probably going to be better than any bat we can sign by the end of the year.  I'm not a big believer in Stowers in a small spring training sample size vs his minor league career.  He will likely be a high K/low OBP7good power guy who will struggle to hold a spot in the majors.

It would be nice if Cowser could handle CF. Mullins is banged up already and the one thing the Orioles don't really have position player wise is a prospect who can step in and handle CF right now. McKenna is a backup and Bradfield isn't ready yet.

On my wishlist is trade one of the excess bats for a solid bullpen arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

It would be nice if Cowser could handle CF. Mullins is banged up already and the one thing the Orioles don't really have position player wise is a prospect who can step in and handle CF right now. McKenna is a backup and Bradfield isn't ready yet.

On my wishlist is trade one of the excess bats for a solid bullpen arm.

I'm on board with trading one of these guys w/o a spot for a bullpen arm.  How has Mateo looked in CF?  Would be nice if Mateo could backup SS & CF.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I'm on board with trading one of these guys w/o a spot for a bullpen arm.  How has Mateo looked in CF?  Would be nice if Mateo could backup SS & CF.

Mateo being able to play CF would be a huge boost and it justifies keeping him on the team. Mateo certainly has the speed to play the outfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I have no idea how they will be able to look him in the eyes and tell them he's going back to AAA. He looks not only ready, but looks ready to be an impact hitter. 

Mayo needs to be the everyday 3B. Whether you send Holliday back to AAA, or send Urias away for what you can get, or make Westburg a super sub, or what, but he needs to be starting at 3B on opening day. 

The home run he hit was so far the LF took two steps and then became a spectator himself.

Not even Walltimore at OPACY is going to be able to contain Mayo's bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Mateo being able to play CF would be a huge boost and it justifies keeping him on the team. Mateo certainly has the speed to play the outfield.

It would be nice if they actually played him there to see, but he keeps playing shortstop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Not even Walltimore at OPACY is going to be able to contain Mayo's bat.

Not to you specifically, but I hope we have plans to bring the wall in some. I hated the old little league wall and wanted it pushed back some, but imo they went overboard. Somewhere in the middle would be good.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Not even Walltimore at OPACY is going to be able to contain Mayo's bat.

He’s gonna go upper deck LF a couple times this year.  Calling it now.  He has prodigious power.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FlaO'sFan said:

Not to you specifically, but I hope we have plans to bring the wall in some. I hated the old little league wall and wanted it pushed back some, but imo they went overboard. Somewhere in the middle would be good.

Because it’s pretty easy to move a wall

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FlaO'sFan said:

Not to you specifically, but I hope we have plans to bring the wall in some. I hated the old little league wall and wanted it pushed back some, but imo they went overboard. Somewhere in the middle would be good.

I agree with this take. The left field porch was too far in before, but Walltimore was an over-correction. I would prefer a happy medium between the old left field and new left field fence at OPACY.

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

It would be nice if they actually played him there to see, but he keeps playing shortstop.

I'm wondering whether Mateo's CF play in practice has convinced the Orioles he's not yet ready to be put out there in ST games -- or, even worse, that there's no use in experimenting because he's not going to be an ML-quality backup CFer. I hope neither of those things is true. It just seems like something that ought to be tried to help shape the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Urias, MacKenna, and Mateo gotta go.  Cowser can back up CF and we have 3 guys that can cover SS.  Mayo needs to be on the OD roster.  Like Tony said, I don’t know how you can tell a guy you have to earn a spot and then go back and tell him what he did wasn’t enough.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...