Jump to content

Framber Valdez vs everyone else


Billy F-Face3

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Valdez was 13th of all qualifying ML pitchers in WHIP last year.  Why do you keep describing it as bad?

The whole argument was that Valdez doesn't miss enough at bats. That's pretty evident when you look his career 1.22 WHIP (I said historically) and you see that he has a decent walk rate. The only other way to inflate your WHIP to that level , if you aren't walking batters, is to give up hits. Ergo he doesn't miss enough bats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

The whole argument was that Valdez doesn't miss enough at bats. That's pretty evident when you look his career 1.22 WHIP (I said historically) and you see that he has a decent walk rate. The only other way to inflate your WHIP to that level , if you aren't walking batters, is to give up hits. Ergo he doesn't miss enough bats.

Doesn’t miss enough bats for what?  His whiff percentage is in the 56%.  His fastball velocity is 73%.   His fastball run value is 7 while Cease was negative.   Ok. Cease misses more bats.  Does that one stat make one pitcher better than another?   I’d be happy with either.   Tough to say one is better than the other.  It’s not that simple.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Doesn’t miss enough bats for what?  His whiff percentage is in the 56%.  His fastball velocity is 73%.   His fastball run value is 7 while Cease was negative.   Ok. Cease misses more bats.  Does that one stat make one pitcher better than another?   I’d be happy with either.   Tough to say one is better than the other.  It’s not that simple.

Yeah I’d say they’re fairly comparable results wise. Cease gets more Ks, but also walks more. Valdez is a big GB pitcher, which explains why he’s able to limit runs despite “not missing bats.” Also, it’s not like everyone is putting it in play against Valdez. His K/9 rate is basically 9. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Valdez is also a ground freaking ball machine. I get that he's a geriatric 30-year-old, but he might make it through a season or two if they can get him some help walking to the mound. Also, Cease's numbers are trending down as well and Valdez' pitch values are still very high. I'm not saying that I'd trade for him, but I also am not interested in Cease. To say that Cease is the clear choice here is not close to accurate.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Actually, I thought I saw his whiff% was in the 40s

He’s right about average. His swing stR% right around average. Same with the shift percentage. 
 

Either way, he doesn’t miss enough bats for me especially when talking about total cost.

To me, both Valdez and Cease are legitimate TOR starters, and as such, I'd be thrilled to have either one of them… for the right price. And that's what it really comes down to. If we're prepared to make a serious run for a WS championship now, either one would be a great addition. I guess I'd be prepared to give up a little bit more for Cease, but I don't want to dramatically overpay for a 30 year old pitcher, even if he's a front line starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

To me, both Valdez and Cease are legitimate TOR starters, and as such, I'd be thrilled to have either one of them… for the right price. And that's what it really comes down to. If we're prepared to make a serious run for a WS championship now, either one would be a great addition. I guess I'd be prepared to give up a little bit more for Cease, but I don't want to dramatically overpay for a 30 year old pitcher, even if he's a front line starter. 

Right…we would be lucky to have either. I like Cease’s profile more, assuming the Os can get him turned around some…if the Os don’t want to go after him, it tells me they see something they don’t like and if that’s the case, they have earned that benefit of the doubt.

I think it’s clear that they like him though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HakunaSakata said:

Hey it's "him" here. Both pitchers have:

1. Similar builds.

2. Similar K rates (below average for aces).

3. Similar below average fastballs. 

4. Have similarly outperformed their expected stats for the majority of their successful seasons. 

So yeah, they are very similar in that regard and I'm not sure why you would think one being right handed and one being left handed is a deal breaker when comparing two pitchers. 

1. You've made that point. We got it. 

2. In 16 years Cueto has a K/9 of 7.9 and never had a "K rate" of more than 8.9. Valdez has a career K/9 of 8.8 and has had two years (out of his 6) above 9. Not sure what defines a "K rate for "aces," but whatever.

3. As I mentioned in previous posts, Cueto throws a 4SFB while Valdez throws a sinker. They are very different pitches. 

4. If we use FIP and xFIP to address this point then Cueto has outperformed his xFIP 8 years out of his 16 year career. Valdez has only done it once, in the COVID shortened 2020 season. So I'm not seeing a similarity there either.

So they are both shorter than average, thickish guys who throw baseballs for a living. Other than that, not all that similar. Got it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A package with Colton Cowser as the headliner might be a way to get a deal done. They will also want a capable pitcher to replace Valdez. I doubt they would want infielders unless they are extra young high valued prospects, that could be ready when Berkman and Altuve's contracts expire. The only infield position that's just about ready for MLB they might want is 1B and C.

 

Of all the starting pitchers rumored to be on the market, if I ignore the fact we don't pay players, I'd say my preference is something like this...

1a) Valdez

1b) Snell (costs no prospects)

1c) Burnes

4) Yamamoto

5) Montgomery

6) Luzardo

7)Kershaw

😎 Stroman

9) Imanaga

10) Cease

Anything farther down the list would have to have a criteria of being cheap lottery ticket, plus a LHP who has had success in previous seasons, and might have a shot at rebounding to one of those types of previous good seasons. (I.E. Ryu, Wood, Manaea, etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Go to your post. Click on the three dots (…) in the top right-hand corner.  Underneath of  “edit”, you’ll see “delete”. 

I think the Delete option must be limited to plus members. The only options I have are Report and Share. It's not really that big a deal. It's not the first time that I've looked like a doofus and I'm sure it won't be the last. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch, Selby is the call up today, with Davidson presumably DFA.   Guessing today’s pitching looks like:  - Suarez (2-3 IP)  - Webb (1 IP)  - Soto (1 IP)  - Dominguez (1 IP)  - Coulombe (1 IP)  - Selby (2 IP) Bowman fills in gaps as needed.
    • Holliday and Henderson is going to be an elite top 2 in the lineup.
    • He’s also replaced the leg kick with a toe tap. At least with two strikes I noticed. 
    • Last year, of 8 WC teams: - 5 went with 12 pitchers - 2 went with 11 pitchers - 1 went with 13 pitchers I expect the Orioles to go with 12 pitchers. Given how Detroit mixes and matches pitching, we need to have enough platoon options.   I do think there is value in having more pitchers, even if it’s just an extra guy for mop up duty that saves pen in blowout game 2 so we aren’t running on fumes in game 3. However, I think 14 position players and 12 pitchers is the right balance for the wild card series.
    • I don't think this is true.  He's struck out 3 times a few times and gone 0-4 several times and 10 posts haven't been made. I hope he has a nice view from the bench during the playoff series and gets an at bat here or there if we're up big or getting blown out.  I'd like to see him put in a lot of work this offseason and start 2025 on fire.
    • I’m not sure why people continue to ignore the ages of Norby and Stowers and how that effected their value. The Marlins received a 21 and 23 year old for Puk. Of course the Marlins still ended up with our 2 “old guys” but that was a last minute trade. They may not have known they would deal Rogers at the time and Puk was dealt earlier and may have carried more value. That said, it’s very possible Elias valued the long term starter over the short term reliever..and I agree that’s a mistake.
    • Ok so not to beat a dead horse, but AJ Puk got me thinking. I know hindsight is 20/20 and I’ve got a Gator bias, but to my eyes, what the Dbacks gave up for AJ Puk is comparable to what we gave up for Soto or Rogers. If you’re Elias, why not target someone like this on the Marlins if you’re already scouting Rogers? It just highlights for me Elias’ failure to address the bullpen with ML acquistions (deadline or FA). It is becoming a real ding to putting us over the top thus far and is definitely the biggest concern we have going into this postseason. I came away satisfied enough at the deadline but can’t help but wonder if we perhaps could have combo’d getting Rogers and Puk with an additional fringe top 10 throw in? I’m still hoping that Rogers gains a few ticks back on his heater (a la Tillman in 2012) and that our bullpen will perform OK in these playoffs. But as much as I love Elias, I’m coming around to the fact that thus far, I think he’s made some head scratching decisions/non-decisions when it comes to the bullpen.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...