Jump to content

Fangraphs’ Ben Clemens: “C’mon Orioles, Do Something!”


Frobby

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Sound like a lot of arrogance from Clemens.  Last year Elias added Gibson, Frazier and Irvin and everyone told him he didn't do enough.    And the O's won 101 games.  This offseason Elias adds Kimbrel and left Gibson, Frazier, Hick, Flaherty and Fuji go and Clemens says he has not done enough.

Maybe Clemens should shut up and consider that Elias knows what he is doing or at least praise Elias for opening space of his blue chip prospects.

Wildcard is the unquestionably one of our most optimistic posters. But this is spot on. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, deward said:

The thing is, it doesn't matter if Montgomery isn't peak Verlander. It only matters if he's a meaningful upgrade from Cole Irvin at the moment. Or Kremer, or Means. If he is, then he's worth the market rate. Clemen's main point here, and he's 100% correct, is that Elias will most likely NEVER have a better nexus of MLB-ready talent and low payroll than he has right now. If he won't, or can't, take advantage of this opportunity, then something will have been lost that he can't get back. Having a group of guys this talented, all arriving at once so that they're this cheap, is in no way a scenario that is guaranteed to repeat again, even if they go through another rebuild.  If he, or Angelos, isn't willing to push for a title under these circumstances, then when will they ever?

I understand both your and Clemens' points.  I'm just saying that Elias may not see 4 years of Montgomery or anyone else that is available as a significant upgrade over the internal options that are available.  I would probably disagree with Elias, but so far, that seems to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, foxfield said:

No it hasn’t. But it might this year so….

Right.  So the talk about hoarding prospects might make more sense IF and when Norby, Ortiz, Cowser, and Kjerstad start the year in AAA instead of somewhere in the majors.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

34 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Sound like a lot of arrogance from Clemens.  Last year Elias added Gibson, Frazier and Irvin and everyone told him he didn't do enough.    And the O's won 101 games.  This offseason Elias adds Kimbrel and left Gibson, Frazier, Hick, Flaherty and Fuji go and Clemens says he has not done enough.

Letting people go isn’t exactly an affirmative act.  He’s added Kimbrel and made a couple of other minor moves like Hilliard.   So he hasn’t done much, and even Elias said at the beginning of the offseason that he wanted to add a starting pitcher, hopefully one that could slot in our top 3.  

The winter isn’t over yet, but if Elias did nothing more I’d be very disappointed   That disappointment may or may not correlate to how the team does in 2024, so I won’t freak out about it.   Elias has earned the benefit of the doubt, and it’s not like we don’t have decent options for our rotation.  But I’d be happy if Elias accomplished his own stated goal for buttressing the rotation.  
 

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m glad that because it happened last year, it will definitely happen this year.  Guess we can skip right to October!

Last season was too much fun.  I don’t want to skip to October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pretty sure no one is saying that we should just give the White Sox whatever.

More like, hey, how about you stop hoarding guys that can't get out of AAA?

The guys that are stuck in AAA are the guys these teams don't want, despite their high prospect ranking - guys like Ortiz, Norby, Stowers, etc - because they're obssessed with the higher tier guys.

The guys they want are new to AAA like Holliday or Mayo, or pre-AAA like Basallo. Or they want the guys we have graduated like Cowser and Kjerstad. 

So... look, the other team has to accept the guys we are "hoarding", and they simply are not. That doesn't mean we should inflate our offer. Either teams accept fair value in return or we "hoard" our guys another 6 months and try again. 

Just because we have the pieces does not means we should give up anything less than exactly what we value those pieces at. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Elias, I have faith.  I totally get being annoyed that they haven't done much outside of Kimbrel.  But at the end of the day, even if Elias does absolutely nothing, its just so hard to be really mad.  He turned a dumpster fire of an org into a really respectable org without spending nearly as much money as other.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

The guys that are stuck in AAA are the guys these teams don't want, despite their high prospect ranking - guys like Ortiz, Norby, Stowers, etc - because they're obssessed with the higher tier guys.

The guys they want are new to AAA like Holliday or Mayo, or pre-AAA like Basallo. Or they want the guys we have graduated like Cowser and Kjerstad. 

So... look, the other team has to accept the guys we are "hoarding", and they simply are not. That doesn't mean we should inflate our offer. Either teams accept fair value in return or we "hoard" our guys another 6 months and try again. 

Just because we have the pieces does not means we should give up anything less than exactly what we value those pieces at. 

I do think we are reaching the point with some of these guys where we should trade them for younger prospects if we aren’t going to play them.  Because their trade value is going to drop if they just sit in AAA all year.   Ortiz and Stowers are two who come to mind.  Of course, I’d prefer that they either get a chance to play here or are traded for major league talent we can use, but if that’s not in the cards, I think trading for younger guys may be the next best choice.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, interloper said:

The guys that are stuck in AAA are the guys these teams don't want, despite their high prospect ranking - guys like Ortiz, Norby, Stowers, etc - because they're obssessed with the higher tier guys.

The guys they want are new to AAA like Holliday or Mayo, or pre-AAA like Basallo. Or they want the guys we have graduated like Cowser and Kjerstad. 

So... look, the other team has to accept the guys we are "hoarding", and they simply are not. That doesn't mean we should inflate our offer. Either teams accept fair value in return or we "hoard" our guys another 6 months and try again. 

Just because we have the pieces does not means we should give up anything less than exactly what we value those pieces at. 

The question I have is are they accurately valuing those pieces?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I do think we are reaching the point with some of these guys where we should trade them for younger prospects if we aren’t going to play them.  Because their trade value is going to drop if they just sit in AAA all year.   Ortiz and Stowers are two who come to mind.  Of course, I’d prefer that they either get a chance to play here or are traded for major league talent we can use, but if that’s not in the cards, I think trading for younger guys may be the next best choice.  

Yeah, and I think we'll start to see that happen if the logjam really becomes untennable and/or when these guys run out of options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
    • I’d have brought up Young immediately after DFAing Kimbrel. Baker has no place on this club this year. Would have been nice to see Young up here.
    • Yeah, but they could've brought him up a month ago and seen what they might have...And Im not "pining" for Brandon Young, just wondering if he's any better than some we have in the pen..
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...