Jump to content

Elias' mental shift


wildcard

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Which would have been different from anything he have done before this off season.

Thats fine.  If your thread title had said, “Elias has done something he’s never done before,” I would have agreed.  Nobody disputes it.  They simply dispute that the reason he did it was a change in his mind set, rather than a change in the situation he’s in.   
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Thats fine.  If your thread title had said, “Elias has done something he’s never done before,” I would have agreed.  Nobody disputes it.  They simply dispute that the reason he did it was a change in his mind set, rather than a change in the situation he’s in.   
 

And it’s the shocking/surprising tone that “omg, they are winners now and they actually want to capitalize on it”

This thread is more about WC’s surprise of this than anything. He has been saying all offseason that Elias won’t do this type of move.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Thats fine.  If your thread title had said, “Elias has done something he’s never done before,” I would have agreed.  Nobody disputes it.  They simply dispute that the reason he did it was a change in his mind set, rather than a change in the situation he’s in.   
 

So maybe the change in situation led him to change his mind set and then his actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

And it’s the shocking/surprising tone that “omg, they are winners now and they actually want to capitalize on it”

This thread is more about WC’s surprise of this than anything. He has been saying all offseason that Elias won’t do this type of move.

That is true but I didn't know the team would be sold.  If he followed lost year he would have pursued Cease and Burnes.  Angelos would not have agreed to sign either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, wildcard said:

That is true but I didn't know the team would be sold.  If he followed lost year he would have pursued Cease and Burnes.  Angelos would not have agreed to sign either.

I’ve seen Rosenthal and many others interviewed.  Elias thought he had a deal for Burnes in place in December then the Brewers decided not to trade him and changed their minds again.   Even Elias says he worked on this (I assume he means he kept JA informed), with Angelos throughout.  Everyone asked this question says the ownership change had nothing to do with this trade.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I’ve seen Rosenthal and many others interviewed.  Elias thought he had a deal for Burnes in place in December then the Brewers decided not to trade him and changed their minds again.   Even Elias says he worked on this (I assume he means he kept JA informed), with Angelos throughout.  Everyone asked this question says the ownership change had nothing to do with this trade.

It’s obvious this is true, but sometimes people just can’t accept a straightforward answer that contradicts their earlier assumptions or speculation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s obvious this is true, but sometimes people just can’t accept a straightforward answer that contradicts their earlier assumptions or speculation.  

You do have an edge to you since retirement.   Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I’ve seen Rosenthal and many others interviewed.  Elias thought he had a deal for Burnes in place in December then the Brewers decided not to trade him and changed their minds again.   Even Elias says he worked on this (I assume he means he kept JA informed), with Angelos throughout.  Everyone asked this question says the ownership change had nothing to do with this trade.

I'm betting that Elias knew there was a possible ownership change in December.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Ok?    How about last July when they were in talks to get Cease?

You are just talking about when the mental shift happened.   Elias had protected and kept his prospects up until the time he traded them.    It could have been July or December or January.   The point is he collected prospects for a long time and then finally he shifted to trading prospects for a veteran.

Elias says it was not a shift because he was building toward the World Series since he got to Baltimore.   And I agree with that sweeping statement.   But the mentality was to keep the  high value prospect/ young players.    Then with the recent trade he shifted/changed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

You are just talking about when the mental shift happened.   Elias had protected and kept his prospects up until the time he traded them.    It could have been July or December or January.   The point is he collected prospects for a long time and then finally he shifted to trading prospects for a veteran.

Elias says it was not a shift because he was building toward the World Series since he got to Baltimore.   And I agree with that sweeping statement.   But the mentality was to keep the  high value prospect/ young players.    Then with the recent trade he shifted/changed.  

You just had a mentality shift.  You were arguing that the reason you were wrong about Elias making this type of move was the ownership change you knew nothing about but maybe Elias did.  Then I brought up them trying to get Cease at the deadline which certainly would have required some good prospects but Hahn asked for Holliday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You just had a mentality shift.  You were arguing that the reason you were wrong about Elias making this type of move was the ownership change you knew nothing about but maybe Elias did.  Then I brought up them trying to get Cease at the deadline which certainly would have required some good prospects but Hahn asked for Holliday.

Yeah, so.   I have no idea what your point is.

And Elias tried to get Bassitt last year but that did not happen.  A lot of things get talked about but never get the approval to happen.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...