Jump to content

Jackson Holliday spring training watch


Frobby

Recommended Posts

This thread is slightly premature, but I figure this is going to be the dominant topic this spring by a wide margin.  So, we may as well start now!   Please post any salient articles and speculation here.  

I’ll kick this off by noting that in a small sample size, Jackson hit .429/.556/.500 last spring in 18 PA, so I guess he gave us a taste of the amazing season that was to follow.   The guys who got “long looks” generally got 45+ PA, so I’ll be watching for Jackson to top that number this spring.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

This thread is slightly premature, but I figure this is going to be the dominant topic this spring by a wide margin.  So, we may as well start now!   Please post any salient articles and speculation here.  

I’ll kick this off by noting that in a small sample size, Jackson hit .429/.556/.500 last spring in 18 PA, so I guess he gave us a taste of the amazing season that was to follow.   The guys who got “long looks” generally got 45+ PA, so I’ll be watching for Jackson to top that number this spring.  
 

On today's episode of As the O's Turn, we'll take a look at Jackson Holliday.  With varying opinions on his abilities at SS, we'll be intently watching to see how he looks there.  With another off-season of physical maturity, could he have improved his range and arm strength to be a strong option at SS, or will he be pegged for now as our future 2B?  Check back tomorrow for another episode of As the O's Turn! 😁

Good topic, btw.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.mlb.com/news/mike-elias-on-jackson-holliday-orioles-spring-training

Elias discussing Holliday this Spring, “I see Jackson being able to bounce back and forth between second and short, depending on the day’s alignment,” Elias said. “I think you’re going to see him at second base a lot during Spring Training, and I know [manager] Brandon Hyde is going to try to put the kid in a position to make the team and give him a real shot for that.”

Based on his words, Tony's scouting report, and Gunnar's outstanding play at SS, I imagine Elias sees Holliday as a better option at 2B, and capable of playing short as needed.  Again, just speculation on my part, as it's very early in Holliday's career and he may yet become a strong defender at SS, giving Hyde even more flexibility.  With Holliday and many other intriguing things to see unfold, it'll be a very exciting Spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Elias is giving me the impression that 2B is Hollidays job to lose.   At this point I’ll be surprised if he’s not on the team OD.    Hopefully, he has a good spring.

Yeah past years featured ML deals for Odor and Frazier, but this year it's been waiver claims for Maton and Soto. Seems like Elias expects Holliday to grab the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking back at Jeter's draft class, he got the 4th highest bonus as the 6th pick in 1992.    The Orioles gave the highest bonus to 4th pick Jeffrey Hammonds, and were set at shortstop in those days.

As if crash course with Corbin Burnes and share knowledge on catching and Orioles Arms with Samuel Basallo wasn't enough going on, I wonder how much Adley Rutschman and Jackson Holliday have had the opportunity to get acquainted in real life.

Jeter's second full pro season in 1994 was his year climbing the ladder, and even Year 3 in 1995 was 123 AAA and 15 MLB games before 1996 liftoff and that warning track flyball that changed much.

Jackson who makes the Opening Day Orioles would outdo Jeter by 2 years, helped by technology giving very young ballplayers a window to I believe maximize skills at far earlier Ages than 30 years ago even if you happen not to have a Hall of Very Good dad.

Jeter Who Can Actually Field (and sends gift baskets to his wife!) would be a fun player to oppose the Yankees with for 7-17 years.    He'd been a few years retired before Matt's spin through NYY in 2017 when kiddo was 13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF Holliday does indeed make the team, where in the lineup would you speculate he'd get most of his AB's?  Would batting lead-off be too much, too soon? Would you ease him into this by batting him in the bottom third of the order? I think it's a matter of time before he finds his way to batting lead off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

IF Holliday does indeed make the team, where in the lineup would you speculate he'd get most of his AB's?  Would batting lead-off be too much, too soon? Would you ease him into this by batting him in the bottom third of the order? I think it's a matter of time before he finds his way to batting lead off.

Just put him at the bottom until his OBP reaches .350, then move him to the top.  That probably takes 4-6 weeks.  😎

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Jeter is an interesting comp.

If he is Jeter without the poorish SS defense because he’s playing 2B, I would be mover the moon!!! That’s a HOF level player and a guy who was as clutch as they get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

If he is Jeter without the poorish SS defense because he’s playing 2B, I would be mover the moon!!! That’s a HOF level player and a guy who was as clutch as they get.

Yes, I would absolutely take a LHB version of Jeter. Even if his defense is Jeter level mediocre, he has the hit tool to make up for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...