Jump to content

Jackson Holliday spring training watch


Frobby

Recommended Posts

We're getting to the point where regulars are going to be starting most of the rest of the way for spring training, so I think Westburg starting at 2B today was telling. 

Elias and Hyde are clearly in love with Urias and Mateo, and Urias/Mateo are going to make the team. In my opinion, that's more of a certainty right now than Holliday making the team.

It's been Elias's MO to hold on to mediocre veteran favorites he acquired off the scrap heap until the bitter end, whether they're free agent signings or waiver wire/Rule V dumpster dive claims. Odor, Frazier, Voth, Baker, Mateo. O'Hearn will probably wind up in that group this season. Urias is an exception as a waiver wire claim that has provided considerable value exceeding any of those in that aforemetioned group. However, he's a veteran, and he's an Elias/Hyde favorite. He's making the team, and I believe Mateo is as well. Having both of those guys on the team makes less sense if Holliday is the OD 2B, although Mateo could theoretically function as a backup SS/5th OF if Cowser makes the team (which I believe he should, and will) and McKenna is DFA'd.

Not only that, but Elias will usually elect to delay starting service time clocks as long as he can, and as often as he can. I disagree with how long Elias has stuck with mediocre vets, but there's certainly a case to be made for keeping Holliday and any elite prospect in Baltimore as long as possible, especially with Boras as Holliday's agent. If there are no injuries to the infielder group of Gunnar, Westburg, and Urias, then I expect that Elias is going to send down Holliday to AAA in order to gain an additional year of service time. Westburg deserves a shot at regular playing time, and he's going to finally get it. And Urias is going to get a good amount of at bats until Holliday gets called up to play everyday - unless Urias gets traded before Opening Day. Mayo is essentially in the same boat as Holliday, and I believe he's just as MLB-ready as Holliday is.

I've thought Holliday was going to start the year at AAA since the end of last season. I still believe that to be the case. Ortiz getting traded significantly increased the chances of Holliday heading north with the team, but at this point, I think only an injury or an additional trade makes it happen. I could certainly be wrong though, and would be glad to see Jackson play every day at 2B starting Opening Day. But ultimately, I think having the extra year of Holliday is the best-case scenario for the organization.

Edited by Brooks The Great
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

We're getting to the point where regulars are going to be starting most of the rest of the way for spring training, so I think Westburg starting at 2B today was telling. 

Elias and Hyde are clearly in love with Urias and Mateo, and Urias/Mateo are going to make the team. In my opinion, that's more of a certainty right now than Holliday making the team.

It's been Elias's MO to hold on to mediocre veteran favorites he acquired off the scrap heap until the bitter end, whether they're free agent signings or waiver wire/Rule V dumpster dive claims. Odor, Frazier, Voth, Baker, Mateo. O'Hearn will probably wind up in that group this season. Urias is an exception as a waiver wire claim that has provided considerable value exceeding any of those in that aforemetioned group. However, he's a veteran, and he's an Elias/Hyde favorite. He's making the team, and I believe Mateo is as well. Having both of those guys on the team makes less sense if Holliday is the OD 2B, although Mateo could theoretically function as a backup SS/5th OF if Cowser makes the team (which I believe he should, and will) and McKenna is DFA'd.

Not only that, but Elias will usually elect to delay starting service time clocks as long as he can, and as often as he can. I disagree with how long Elias has stuck with mediocre vets, but there's certainly a case to be made for keeping Holliday and any elite prospect in Baltimore as long as possible, especially with Boras as Holliday's agent. If there are no injuries to the infielder group of Gunnar, Westburg, and Urias, then I expect that Elias is going to send down Holliday to AAA in order to gain an additional year of service time. Westburg deserves a shot at regular playing time, and he's going to finally get it. And Urias is going to get a good amount of at bats until Holliday gets called up to play everyday - unless Urias gets traded before Opening Day. Mayo is essentially in the same boat as Holliday, and I believe he's just as MLB-ready as Holliday is.

I've thought Holliday was going to start the year at AAA since the end of last season. I still believe that to be the case. Ortiz getting traded significantly increased the chances of Holliday heading north with the team, but at this point, I think only an injury or an additional trade makes it happen. I could certainly be wrong though, and would be glad to see Jackson play every day at 2B starting Opening Day. But ultimately, I think having the extra year of Holliday is the best-case scenario for the organization.

Westburg has started 5 games at 3rd and 2 each at 2nd and SS, but the single game he started at 2nd, over two weeks out from opening day, was “telling”.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

It's been Elias's MO to hold on to mediocre veteran favorites he acquired off the scrap heap until the bitter end, whether they're free agent signings or waiver wire/Rule V dumpster dive claims.

Even more so if he acquired them in the draft...remember when Rio Ruiz was going to suddenly defend the middle infield in the waning moments of his Orioles tenure.

Sigbot might today think as it always has that J.D. Davis is better than Ryan Mountcastle.    J.D. Davis' experiences of the last week...it is starting to settle for me that 2024 is the last Orioles season for both of The Ryans.

Even if they have good years as a platoon combo and get a bunch of RBI's.     I don't think there's as much as it may seem in the way of 2025 Opening Day 1B Samuel Basallo, especially if Mayo shows himself able to defend 3B.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to circle back on how valuable the draft pick could be if Holliday begins the season on the roster and wins the ROY. The pick only may be ranked as a certain value in the trade simulator, but it’s much more valuable to us versus another org. 

Whatever potential money/value we lose by not gaining the extra partial service year of Holliday, is value/money gained in that I trust our FO to use the pick/slot amount to nab us a contributor on our 2027-2033 ball clubs, or as a trade asset in between then. 

In the range of that pick we could draft a HS pitcher/HS SS that isn’t top tier but doesn’t want to go to NCAA, or an NCAA corner guy 1B/3B/LF/RF that doesn’t have superstar potential. Like a Dylan Beavers. Or a NCAA back of rotation SP/potential top bullpen pitcher. Like the next Dylan McDermott.

We’d have those guys for 6+ service years and their value over those years could offset whatever the value is of Holliday under control in arb in 2030. 

Let’s say Holliday is worth $60 million in value in 2030. Well a McDermott or Beavers type prospect could very well be right around that $60 million in value in over their six year career total.

Then Long/Short of it, let the kid eat from OD on. Get that ROY award and draft pick. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Just to circle back on how valuable the draft pick could be if Holliday begins the season on the roster and wins the ROY. The pick only may be ranked as a certain value in the trade simulator, but it’s much more valuable to us versus another org. 

Whatever potential money/value we lose by not gaining the extra partial service year of Holliday, is value/money gained in that I trust our FO to use the pick/slot amount to nab us a contributor on our 2027-2033 ball clubs, or as a trade asset in between then. 

In the range of that pick we could draft a HS pitcher/HS SS that isn’t top tier but doesn’t want to go to NCAA, or an NCAA corner guy 1B/3B/LF/RF that doesn’t have superstar potential. Like a Dylan Beavers. Or a NCAA back of rotation SP/potential top bullpen pitcher. Like the next Dylan McDermott.

We’d have those guys for 6+ service years and their value over those years could offset whatever the value is of Holliday under control in arb in 2030. 

Let’s say Holliday is worth $60 million in value in 2030. Well a McDermott or Beavers type prospect could very well be right around that $60 million in value in over their six year career total.

Then Long/Short of it, let the kid eat from OD on. Get that ROY award and draft pick. 

Your argument consists of five paragraphs.  Four of them revolve around the word "could" and the other is all about trust - trusting that the FO can peer several years into the future and successfully nullify the risk inherent in speculating about the unknowable.  I want to see Holliday on Opening Day too, but I sincerely hope Elias' decision-making process is a little more rigorous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Your argument consists of five paragraphs.  Four of them revolve around the word "could" and the other is all about trust - trusting that the FO can peer several years into the future and successfully nullify the risk inherent in speculating about the unknowable.  I want to see Holliday on Opening Day too, but I sincerely hope Elias' decision-making process is a little more rigorous.

His decision making process is a lot more rigorous than that any of us experts here. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 24fps said:

Your argument consists of five paragraphs.  Four of them revolve around the word "could" and the other is all about trust - trusting that the FO can peer several years into the future and successfully nullify the risk inherent in speculating about the unknowable.  I want to see Holliday on Opening Day too, but I sincerely hope Elias' decision-making process is a little more rigorous.

Ok I’ll simplify it. The pick Holliday could win us would be around #30ish. Here’s some players that Elias has drafted around that pick.

2022 #33 Dylan Beavers

2022 #42 Max Wagner

2021 #41 Connor Norby

2020 #30 Jordan Westburg 

2019 #42 Gunnar Henderson

So starting Holliday on OD, and losing the 2030 season of control, but gaining the #30 if he wins ROY, is definitely leaning to the side of being worth it given the past success we’ve had picking in a similar spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a kid who has a shot to be rookie of the year than you gotta put him not he OD roster.  Especially if he's earned it, which Holliday has.  These chances don't come around every year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, connja said:

If you have a kid who has a shot to be rookie of the year than you gotta put him not he OD roster.  Especially if he's earned it, which Holliday has.  These chances don't come around every year.  

While he'd have a shot this year,  he'd likely be the favorite next year.   I agree that Holliday has earned it,  but I just don't see it happening.  Until proven otherwise, I expect him down long enough to get the extra year of control,  get past Super 2 status and maybe even long enough to ensure his ROY chances for 2025.  I completely disagree with it going that way,  and hope he's starting on OD.  But until it's officially announced that he's not going back to AAA, that's where I expect to see him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

While he'd have a shot this year,  he'd likely be the favorite next year.   I agree that Holliday has earned it,  but I just don't see it happening.  Until proven otherwise, I expect him down long enough to get the extra year of control,  get past Super 2 status and maybe even long enough to ensure his ROY chances for 2025.  I completely disagree with it going that way,  and hope he's starting on OD.  But until it's officially announced that he's not going back to AAA, that's where I expect to see him.

The only way Holliday stays down long enough to not stay a rookie into 2025 is if he gets injured for most of the year or is catastrophically bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Just to circle back on how valuable the draft pick could be if Holliday begins the season on the roster and wins the ROY. The pick only may be ranked as a certain value in the trade simulator, but it’s much more valuable to us versus another org. 

Whatever potential money/value we lose by not gaining the extra partial service year of Holliday, is value/money gained in that I trust our FO to use the pick/slot amount to nab us a contributor on our 2027-2033 ball clubs, or as a trade asset in between then. 

In the range of that pick we could draft a HS pitcher/HS SS that isn’t top tier but doesn’t want to go to NCAA, or an NCAA corner guy 1B/3B/LF/RF that doesn’t have superstar potential. Like a Dylan Beavers. Or a NCAA back of rotation SP/potential top bullpen pitcher. Like the next Dylan McDermott.

We’d have those guys for 6+ service years and their value over those years could offset whatever the value is of Holliday under control in arb in 2030. 

Let’s say Holliday is worth $60 million in value in 2030. Well a McDermott or Beavers type prospect could very well be right around that $60 million in value in over their six year career total.

Then Long/Short of it, let the kid eat from OD on. Get that ROY award and draft pick. 

$60 million in one player for one season is much more valuable than $60 million in one player over six seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, forphase1 said:

While he'd have a shot this year,  he'd likely be the favorite next year.   I agree that Holliday has earned it,  but I just don't see it happening.  Until proven otherwise, I expect him down long enough to get the extra year of control,  get past Super 2 status and maybe even long enough to ensure his ROY chances for 2025.  I completely disagree with it going that way,  and hope he's starting on OD.  But until it's officially announced that he's not going back to AAA, that's where I expect to see him.

No way Holliday is ROY eligible heading into 2025.  Super 2 maybe but the Adley clock is ticking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...