Jump to content

Jackson Holliday spring training watch


Frobby

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, forphase1 said:

I also think the upgrade from Urias to Mayo is a bigger upgrade than Westburg to Holliday, at least for this year.   If I had to choose one over the other,  I'd pick Mayo largely due to the bat being more ready now and also due to whose spot he takes. 

Holliday's at-bats, if he makes the team, will come at the expense of Westburg and Urias.

If Holliday is on the roster, Westburg probably starts 3 games a week at third and 1 game every other week or so at second, with Holliday serving as the primary backup shortstop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Holliday's at-bats, if he makes the team, will come at the expense of Westburg and Urias.

If Holliday is on the roster, Westburg probably starts 3 games a week at third and 1 game every other week or so at second, with Holliday serving as the primary backup shortstop.

If that's actually what happens, then perhaps that would change my viewpoint a bit on choosing between the two.  I know Westburg played 30ish games at 3rd last year, but for some reason I still have him largely penciled in at 2nd with Urias at 3rd.  But if Holliday does make the team, and that pushed Westburg to the be primary 3rd baseman, I'd much rather that happen that Urias usually holding down 3rd.  I'd still rather see Holliday, Henderson, Mayo as the starters with Westburg starting 3-4 times a week to give one of those 3 a break.  Don't really care what happens to Urias or Mateo in that scenario, hopefully one or both of them no longer on the roster.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, O's84 said:

Holliday with a HR.

Again, SSS and spring training to boot, but he's showing he deserves to be on the team.  Still don't think it happens, but we can't act like his performance doesn't justify it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to become a believer that Holliday might actually make the 26 man roster. And I had always doubted it for the obvious benefits of giving him more time in AAA to see LHP and save his service time while we had Henderson, Mateo, Westburg, and Urias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People were talking about the HR and the hustle single, but his ABs were fantastic.  3-2 on multiple ABs including the hustle single and a BB in second AB.  Folks have pointed to the high strike-out totals.  5 ks came in the first 7ABs of the spring.  Remove those and you are looking at something closer to his historical line.  He's been better than I expected this spring, and I expected him to make the team.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Love Urias but his days in and O’s uniform are numbered. All SS/3B/2B ABs should be going to some combo of Gunnar, Holliday, Westburg, and Mayo. Mateo with the occasional start since he can now play OF. 

Which is wild because Urias has had a fantastic Spring and has been an above average player since we acquired him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I'm starting to become a believer that Holliday might actually make the 26 man roster. And I had always doubted it for the obvious benefits of giving him more time in AAA to see LHP and save his service time while we had Henderson, Mateo, Westburg, and Urias.

Are there any real signs that he won't be making the roster outside of conventional wisdom? It seems like most of the signs (albeit mostly limited and speculation) point to him starting the year on the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dzorange said:

Are there any real signs that he won't be making the roster outside of conventional wisdom? It seems like most of the signs (albeit mostly limited and speculation) point to him starting the year on the O's.

There's no way to know. There are valid reasons for it to go either way.

I think he makes is because Elias has said they're in win now mode. Based on what he's said and how Holliday has played, I don't think there's a chance he doesn't make it.

But what do I know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...