Jump to content

Julio Teheran Flyer


George Zuverink

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Spencer Watkins will hereby be forever known as Spencer Watkina.

Not a bad move to kick he tires and see if there's anything left in the tank with Teheran.  Maybe Holt the Wizard can wave his wand around and coax out some good innings.

Except the Brewers pitching wizards have more power than the Orioles and didn't fix him. Its one thing to get these kind of guys on straight minors deals or with options. My guess is he opts out after spring training. Why give innings to him in spring when we can use them to look at younger guys 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

Except the Brewers pitching wizards have more power than the Orioles and didn't fix him. Its one thing to get these kind of guys on straight minors deals or with options. My guess is he opts out after spring training. Why give innings to him in spring when we can use them to look at younger guys 

I wasn't aware that the Brewers pitching wizards had more juice than Holty.

It's not as if the younger guys aren't going to get looks.  With Bradish probably going down and Means not being ready, we need to take a look at some guys.  This isn't a big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a 100K insurance policy in case another starter goes down.   By the end of the month they should have a better read on Means and Bradish.  If things look promising on either one and the current 5 is intact do they make Teheran a $2M long man?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

It’s a 100K insurance policy in case another starter goes down.   By the end of the month they should have a better read on Means and Bradish.  If things look promising on either one and the current 5 is intact do they make Teheran a $2M long man?

 

Did Elias tell you this was the plan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

It’s a 100K insurance policy in case another starter goes down.   By the end of the month they should have a better read on Means and Bradish.  If things look promising on either one and the current 5 is intact do they make Teheran a $2M long man?

 

I don't think he'd be bad insurance.   At 2M, it's not that big of a deal and doesn't stop you from making other moves if you need to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Did Elias tell you this was the plan?

We don’t talk anymore.  He doesn’t like me sharing his plans on the Hangout.   I’m left with taking the information I get and formulating an opinion.   It takes a bit of thinking.  I wouldn’t recommend it in your case.  Stick to judging when top prospects should be sent down during the season.  That’s your forte, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wasn't aware that the Brewers pitching wizards had more juice than Holty.

It's not as if the younger guys aren't going to get looks.  With Bradish probably going down and Means not being ready, we need to take a look at some guys.  This isn't a big deal.

Oh yea I don't think its that big of a deal I would just prefer it be a full minor league deal, it just gets tiresome digging through the dumpster thinking we can fix everyone. I am still hoping they go get someone a little more established to backfill injuries 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I wasn't aware that the Brewers pitching wizards had more juice than Holty.

It's not as if the younger guys aren't going to get looks.  With Bradish probably going down and Means not being ready, we need to take a look at some guys.  This isn't a big deal.

You must have skipped the Brewers half of the coverage of the Burnes trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...