Jump to content

Julio Teheran Flyer


George Zuverink

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

Oh yea I don't think its that big of a deal I would just prefer it be a full minor league deal, it just gets tiresome digging through the dumpster thinking we can fix everyone. I am still hoping they go get someone a little more established to backfill injuries 

Isn't it a full minor league deal?  He's not on the 40 man.  He got a 100k signing bonus.  He's guaranteed nothing else.   Is it the opt out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TommyPickles said:

I like the addition of Teheran. He was decent last season with the Brewers, he's still just 33, and his 1.130 WHIP in 2023 was below his career average. Nice experience and talent to have in your minors.

Thought I saw he had an opt out. He may not stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

It’s a 100K insurance policy in case another starter goes down.   By the end of the month they should have a better read on Means and Bradish.  If things look promising on either one and the current 5 is intact do they make Teheran a $2M long man?

 

I think they could make him a $2M long man if they think there’s something there to work with. If they think he’s just a 33 year old ~4.90 ERA guy, why bother. Zimmermann or even Armbruester could do that if they just don’t want to disrupt Povich/McDermott’s continued development.

It also could be a little window into what they actually think about Means’ and Bradish’s injuries if they keep Teheran as the long man / 6th starter, doesn’t make sense to give him $2M to do that if they really think Means is due back in a few weeks and Bradish midseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

I think they could make him a $2M long man if they think there’s something there to work with. If they think he’s just a 33 year old ~4.90 ERA guy, why bother. Zimmermann or even Armbruester could do that if they just don’t want to disrupt Povich/McDermott’s continued development.

It also could be a little window into what they actually think about Means’ and Bradish’s injuries if they keep Teheran as the long man / 6th starter, doesn’t make sense to give him $2M to do that if they really think Means is due back in a few weeks and Bradish midseason.

Yeah, I think this is like “We’ll give you 100k to get ready for the season and we’ll see how desperate we are at the end of March”.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, wildcard said:

Hello Chris Holt.   Teheran (age 33) looks like a project in ST for the O's pitching lab.   Teheran pitched 129 innings and 24 starts last year between the majors and the minors.   He added a cutter that batters only hit .219.  His curve had a .074 average.    

His sinker  got hit at a .285 rate and it was only 90 mph but Teheran has not averaged 92 with any pitch since 2015. 

In 2019 he had a 10-11, 3.81 ERA, 33 S, 174 IP with 89.7 mph fastball while pitching for the Braves. 

He had a shoulder strain in 2021 and the recovery was long.  2023 was  the first indication that he might have something left.

With Tylers Wells and Irvin pushed into the rotation the O's could use a long man in the pen to begin the season.  Depending on what the pitching lab is able to do for him he could fill that role.  And if there is another injury in the rotation Teheran is a candidate to fill the void.

He has an opt out from his minor league contract if he does not make the team.

Great take. The O’s staff and Brewers staff both have HOU ties. We have a good working relationship with Milwaukee. The Brewers pitching lab obviously helped JT, but it wasn’t a permanent fix. Maybe we can capitalize off of those first handful of starts. JT is also a year further removed from the injury and has 77 MLB IP under his belt from last season. 

It’s just an MILB deal for a guy that was the #5 SP for a playoff team’s rotation last year. The AL/NL difference isn’t that big of of a deal now that there is a DH and both leagues. 

As of now, JT and Zimmerman are our #6-#7 SP. Elias is trying his best, but it’s obvious there is a budget. So why not grab a cheap guy that had success for your buddies last year in the same “system”?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't like the opt out. That puts some pressure on us to have him make the team. I guess it is $100k for first dibs on him if he looks decent. 

We don’t know the opt out date.  It may not be at the end of March.  Let’s not forget that Teheran is coming to camp two weeks late.   We may not even see him pitch until March 8 or so.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I remember wishing Johan Santana didn't get hurt.  I wanted to see what he could do.  

Yup. Instead we got Freddy Garcia and Gallardo. JT is probably similar to those two. At least we didn’t have to give JT 3/21 and lose a draft pick. Man, the dark days were dark. 

We needed a guy like JT or Matt Boyd. Just a vet arm for depth. Also, this is a $2.1 million deal if we call him up for even one appearance. So he’s SP depth. I don’t think we’d spend that money to have him pitch in relief with no options. 

Just depth in case one of Burnes, GR, Kremer, Wells, or Irvin, gets hurt. 

I’m sure Elias would prefer to sign on of Clevinger/Lorenzen over JT. Elias just doesn’t have the budget. If that’s the case, we should consider trading/not picking up the contracts of Mateo, Urias, and even O’Hearn. We have backup bats. We don’t have back up SP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

A lot of these types of deals have Opt outs.

Cost of doing business.

 

20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

We don’t know the opt out date.  It may not be at the end of March.  Let’s not forget that Teheran is coming to camp two weeks late.   We may not even see him pitch until March 8 or so.   

Agreed with both points. There is little downside here. But if the opt out is end of March then it may not really be "AAA depth" signing. In that case, it is more likely to be 5th starter for the MLB team, he goes somewhere else, or he sucks and disappears. If the opt out is later (which I didn't even think of), then the AAA depth outcome is more likely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...