Jump to content

What if Holliday is sent down?


Sports Guy

Holliday sent down  

113 members have voted

  1. 1. What will your reaction be if the Os send Holliday to AAA to start the year?

    • Like it. Gives the team the potential to get the extra year of service time and allows him to work on defense and hitting vs lefties in a lower pressure environment
    • Hate it. He’s one of the best players, so he should be out there
    • Don’t really care either way. Happy with either decision


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m not sure the power is comparable. Holliday has higher EVs. His power upside is higher.

I don’t think you are reading what I’m saying correctly. I think Adley is extremely talented. I just think we happen to have an organization right now where they are 2 and maybe as many as 4 guys more talented.  It’s quite possible that in a few years, the Os will have 5 of the 20 most talented players in the sport. 
 

Adley has to be more consistent with his throwing before you put that last statement in there.  
 

 

It's really a lot of splitting hairs.  They were both 1-1 draft picks and unanimous #1 overall prospects.  Obviously, they're both extremely talented.  A preference for one or the other is fine, but I don't think it's fair to say Holliday clearly outclasses Adley as a talent.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went #2. He's the best option for 2B this year. This organization is in win mode. Having him at 2B gives them the best chances to win.

I'm confident he's going to be on the OD roster because of what Elias said.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want the O’s to win the division and make the playoffs.  If that happens, whatever they do with Holliday is fine with me.  Do whatever gives us the best chance to win.  I don’t assume that will mean putting Holliday on the OD roster, but it might.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I want the O’s to win the division and make the playoffs.  If that happens, whatever they do with Holliday is fine with me.  Do whatever gives us the best chance to win.  I don’t assume that will mean putting Holliday on the OD roster, but it might.  

We need Doctor Strange to look at all 14,000,605 possibilities and let us know which is the right one.

Edited by spleen1015
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, clapdiddy said:

I picked option 3.   I think his ability to hit lefties MAY play some sort of role in their decision making, but I'm not sure it's that big of a deal.  You have versatile guys in Urias, Westburg, and Gunnar that can start against lefties.   Heck, if Mateo somehow sticks around as an IF/OF, you have even more depth.

I trust the management of this team to make the right decisions.

This is the correct answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, George Zuverink said:

My guess is that some of Sig's simulation models look at more possible combinations than that.

Perhaps, but what would Sig do with all of that?  The amount of time he and Elias and a few others have to actually think deeply about stuff like this is limited, so any decently designed model would first filter out data presentations that the recipient(s) found irrelevant which would be at least 99% of them in a situation like this. 

It's our collective 21st century dilemma in a nutshell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Well years isn’t really about us…it’s about him right?  How many of those FA years does he want to give up?

Now, it could also be structured to be like the Witt contract where he essentially gets several option years.

Lets just say you bring him up from day 1 this year and he is here to stay.

3 years of league minimum and then 3 more years where he probably makes somewhere between 40-55M. 

On the low end, that has him in the are of 6/42ish and on the high end of 6/58ish.

That means he is a FA for his age 27 season. I can’t imagine he will be willing to give up more than 3 FA years and 3 may be tough. 
 

So, (changing what I said in the original post because I was just throwing something out there) I think an 8 year deal for 110-120M is something he just can’t and wouldn’t turn down. That is essentially guaranteeing him high end money for this time period and it allows him to be a FA at a prime time of his career.  If you could extend it to 9/150, that’s cool too but I think that’s stretching it, at least in terms of a guarantee..like I said, maybe you can get player options.

I was pondering whether to sign in, just to make exactly this point, and almost exactly this length of contract/money.

I think it would be best to try an 8- year contract so he’s 28 as an FA( with so many rings he’s running out of fingers) and he can still get another 8-10 year contract.

A nice compact 8/115, or maybe 9 with an opt out after 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Yea, 6 weeks puts him in that Adley range. You probably can argue that he has more competition for top 2 this year than Adley had. 
 

The other thing with 4-6 weeks is that also likely means he’s a super 2. Not definite but likely.(especially if it’s more like 4 weeks)

There are some nice rookies this year, but Adley's 2022 did have Julio and Witt on Opening Day rosters.     Rangers guys against Orioles guys should be good competition if we aren't bobbing and weaving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Pickles said:

I also don't think he's near as read as Adley was to hit the ground running.

 

Well, sure.    But COVID and Mike Elias' management of the Orioles talent were some of the causes there too.    Adley is the one whose debut age is a wild outlier for how strong a player he is.

In 2030, Jackson Holliday's salary is probably going to be ~$18M, or ~$30M, and the Orioles have the edge on the field to win his buy-in either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Perhaps, but what would Sig do with all of that?  The amount of time he and Elias and a few others have to actually think deeply about stuff like this is limited, so any decently designed model would first filter out data presentations that the recipient(s) found irrelevant which would be at least 99% of them in a situation like this. 

It's our collective 21st century dilemma in a nutshell.

Yup. It’d what I do for a living.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The draft pick that he could win is really important to us. 

It’s not as important as an extra year of control. We didn’t suddenly become the Dodgers since getting rid of the Angelos family. Can’t assume uncle Dave is gonna spend like crazy. 
 

I hope they’ve at least explored extension with him, and he sees it as a ticket to start the season in Baltimore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...