Jump to content

How Stowers and Cowser can Make the Roster


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

Answer: by optioning (or trading) O'Hearn.

We have mostly been treating O'Hearn as a lock. But if Mountcastle can be more or less full time 1B, Stowers and Cowser can both make it. Westburg, Santander, and Urias can play some 1B when needed. O'Hearn would still be a phone call away in AAA. 

O'Hearn had a great year for us and a fine spring, but is he likely to repeat? Even if he does, Stowers could be better. Could O'Hearn be more vulnerable than we think? 

RHP lineup would be Holliday 2B, Adley C, Gunnar SS, Santander RF, Mountcastle 1B, Mullins RF, Stowers DH, Urias 3B with bench of Mateo, McCann, Westburg, Hays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's this article on MLB.com

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/news/ryan-o-hearn-a-leader-for-orioles-in-2024-season

with this quote from Hyde.

"He's on the team, he just needs to get ready for the season,” Hyde said Friday before the O’s 7-2 loss to the Rays at Charlotte Sports Park. “He's earned it, and he deserves it. And he's one of the leaders on our team, also. I love the way he goes about his business. He's a total professional.”

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Answer: by optioning (or trading) O'Hearn.

We have mostly been treating O'Hearn as a lock. But if Mountcastle can be more or less full time 1B, Stowers and Cowser can both make it. Westburg, Santander, and Urias can play some 1B when needed. O'Hearn would still be a phone call away in AAA. 

O'Hearn had a great year for us and a fine spring, but is he likely to repeat? Even if he does, Stowers could be better. Could O'Hearn be more vulnerable than we think? 

RHP lineup would be Holliday 2B, Adley C, Gunnar SS, Santander RF, Mountcastle 1B, Mullins RF, Stowers DH, Urias 3B with bench of Mateo, McCann, Westburg, Hays. 

Pick a lane:

"But I also don't put much stock in spring performance and priority on options/asset accumulation fit Elias's MO"

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I think as of now, all three make it and they only carry 4 infielders (minus 1b) to start the season.

I'd have no problem with this.   There is enough versatility with the infield that this shouldn't be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O’Hearn is on the team. Optioning him for Stowers, yikes. It’s spring training. We are getting carried away with these numbers. Rather have it than not, and his day was impressive yesterday, sure. There is a lot more to it, and I don’t think it would go over very well to option one of your best performers last year, who happens to be a veteran clubhouse leader. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Championship year or transition year?

Feel like the O's have the talent to make this a championship year, but instead it will be a transition year from veterans who are good not great (and in decline) to the young players who ARE READY right now.

Management seems committed to Mullins, Hays, Santander, Mountcastle, Mateo, Urias, and O'hearn (please no Wong), and I do not believe that all of these players should be on the 26

Hope we don't lose our window while working veterans off of the 26, and further delaying the progress or losing by trade the better players 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

Pick a lane:

"But I also don't put much stock in spring performance and priority on options/asset accumulation fit Elias's MO"

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Won’t happen.  

Agreed, I do not think this will actually happen and it goes against everything we know about spring stats and modern GM's. This is more of a thought exercise than a serious prediction. While I still have O'Hearn penciled in for the opening day roster, I do think he could be on a shortish leash should he show signs of regression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I think as of now, all three make it and they only carry 4 infielders (minus 1b) to start the season.

So you have Kjerstad, Holliday and Mayo in the minors.

On a normal day, the lineup looks like this (not by order)

Adley

Mountcastle

Westburg

Gunnar

Urias

Hays

Mullins

Santander

OHearn

 

Cowser will get in there a good amount but don’t see Stowers playing much at all.

So, in your scenario, Stowers is here to play a few times a week at most and we play Urias or Mateo everyday.

Ugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

There's this article on MLB.com

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/news/ryan-o-hearn-a-leader-for-orioles-in-2024-season

with this quote from Hyde.

"He's on the team, he just needs to get ready for the season,” Hyde said Friday before the O’s 7-2 loss to the Rays at Charlotte Sports Park. “He's earned it, and he deserves it. And he's one of the leaders on our team, also. I love the way he goes about his business. He's a total professional.”

Thanks for the quote. We forget sometimes that there are people behind these names and sometimes that leadership or personal quality makes the clubhouse and perhaps team better. 

O'Hearn probably does deserve to be part of the team anyways based off last year. I just wished they would have moved either him or Mountcastle to a lesser extent and opened up a spot for Mayo who looked ready last year in AAA and now this spring.

But either way, as long as Santander, Mullins and Hays are on this team, there is no room for both Stowers and Cowser.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

So you have Kjerstad, Holliday and Mayo in the minors.

On a normal day, the lineup looks like this (not by order)

Adley

Mountcastle

Westburg

Gunnar

Urias

Hays

Mullins

Santander

OHearn

 

Cowser will get in there a good amount but don’t see Stowers playing much at all.

So, in your scenario, Stowers is here to play a few times a week at most and we play Urias or Mateo everyday.

Ugh

Correct.

Stowser is going to get the least amount of abs, many of them against LHPs ironically.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...