Jump to content

Holliday or Skenes. Who would you rather have?

LookinUp

By LookinUp
in Orioles Talk

 Share

Who would you rather have?  

101 members have voted

  1. 1. Holliday or Skenes?

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/20/24 at 19:53

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Sports Guy
Sports Guy

The hitter..always the hitter.

Orioles0615
Orioles0615

I would take having Skenes over someone like Cowser or Kjersted but not Holliday.    I am sure Skenes will have TJ surgery eventually 

Frobby
Frobby

I think our pitching is underrated.  But I think Skenes has the potential to be better than anyone we have.

ChosenOne21 Major Leaguer Rising Star

ChosenOne21

Posted
Posted

It's fine to prefer Holliday over Skenes, but this "no thanks, pitchers get hurt" idea is getting to be a bit much.

If all good pitchers get hurt and we need good pitchers to win, we need good pitchers who will get hurt. I don't know where we're going to find these mythical unicorn pitchers who aren't an injury risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roy Firestone Hangout Grand Counsel

Roy Firestone

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, foxfield said:

Interesting thought process, but no.  I would however, move a huge load of prospects for him.  But if you could have a great pitcher or a great everyday player, you have to take the everyday guy.

'"Tightness in the forearm.'..changes everything in an instant...The most dreaded words for a pitcher in baseball are: "Neal S. ElAttrache, "

 

20 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Skenes is about 1.5 years older.

Paul Skenes is 21 years old. Turns 22 in May.

Jackson Holliday is 20 years old. Turns 21 in December.

Personally, I'd take Skenes. I think he's the top prospect in baseball. I might have a different answer if the choice was Gunnar. I'll decide that after I see responses here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baltfan Hangout Grand Counsel

baltfan

Posted
Posted

This question is really based upon a variety of factors.  Given where the Orioles are currently, their set of prospects, and their needs if this were the draft and I had to pick from present Holliday and present Skenes, I would take Skenes.  The gamble that he would be a generational talent ala Strasburg would be worth it.  I like Holliday a lot, but honestly don't think he has the upside of Gunnar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sports Guy Hangout Grand Counsel

Sports Guy

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, baltfan said:

This question is really based upon a variety of factors.  Given where the Orioles are currently, their set of prospects, and their needs if this were the draft and I had to pick from present Holliday and present Skenes, I would take Skenes.  The gamble that he would be a generational talent ala Strasburg would be worth it.  I like Holliday a lot, but honestly don't think he has the upside of Gunnar.

I can tell you for sure the Os disagree with that and he is more advanced than Gunnar was at the same age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
interloper Hangout Grand Counsel

interloper

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ChosenOne21 said:

It's fine to prefer Holliday over Skenes, but this "no thanks, pitchers get hurt" idea is getting to be a bit much.

If all good pitchers get hurt and we need good pitchers to win, we need good pitchers who will get hurt. I don't know where we're going to find these mythical unicorn pitchers who aren't an injury risk.

It's not that you just avoid pitchers altogether, it's just that you don't burn top draft picks on them. You find them later in the draft and develop them, or you trade for them, or you sign them. But passing on a can't miss position player prospect at the top of the draft for a pitcher seems foolish to me, no matter how hard he throws. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I can tell you for sure the Os disagree with that and he is more advanced than Gunnar was at the same age.

How do you know what the O’s think about who has more upside between Holliday and Gunnar?  Have you spoken to Elias recently?   Hard to argue the “more advanced at the same age” point, but that’s got nothing to do with upside.  Both players have a lot of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tony-OH Hangout Grand Counsel

Tony-OH

Posted
Posted

Skenes is an impressive pitcher no doubt, but I would take Holliday. Holliday is going to be a lead off hitter who is going to get on base at a .400+ rate and probably end up hitting 20-25 bombs and year while playing plus defense at 2B or Averge-ish defense at SS if he plats there at some point.

When you add in the additional injury risk that comes with pitchers, that also leans towards Holliday. 

Two great players for sure, but I'm taking the position player who has few holes in his game already at 20-years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aristotelian Hangout Grand Counsel

Aristotelian

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Roy Firestone said:

'"Tightness in the forearm.'..changes everything in an instant...The most dreaded words for a pitcher in baseball are: "Neal S. ElAttrache, "

 

 

You would think Dr. ElAttrache would have at least some competition in the business by now. Any med students out there reading this, Tommy John is a lucrative specialty and there appears to be only one guy doing it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, interloper said:

I don't see how anyone can think Holliday doesn't have at least similar upside to Gunnar, and probably more based on what he's doing for his age. 

The fact that Holliday has a major leaguer for a father and can sleep next door to a batting cage with very sophisticated equipment all winter is a double-edged sword.  It makes him extremely advanced for his age due to his upbringing and opportunity, but arguably limits his upward mobility since he has less to learn at the major league level than most players.   So I don’t think that what Holliday has done at a young age tells us that much about his upside.   His upside comes more from the expectation that he will get bigger and stronger, not so much that he will refine his skills.  Gunnar’s the opposite.   He’s about done physically, but still learning some of the nuances of the game.  

I personally don’t have an opinion on who has more upside, just that both have plenty.   But I just don’t claim to know what the Orioles think.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moose Milligan Hangout Grand Counsel

Moose Milligan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

It's fine to prefer Holliday over Skenes, but this "no thanks, pitchers get hurt" idea is getting to be a bit much.

If all good pitchers get hurt and we need good pitchers to win, we need good pitchers who will get hurt. I don't know where we're going to find these mythical unicorn pitchers who aren't an injury risk.

I really don't think that it is.  

More and more pitchers are going down with TJ, especially when we're in an age where it's max effort guys that are throwing 100 mph every time out.  As we're seeing with Means, it takes more than a year to come back from it.  

They are injury risks, to pretend that they're not would be intentionally obtuse.  But say if you have a guy like Skenes and Holliday come up on the same day and you've got them for the first six years of their career, the odds favorite Skenes as the guy who is going to miss significant time with an injury.  If Holliday has a significant injury, it's probably going to be an ACL or an Achilles and he can make it back into the lineup faster, most likely.

It's about maximizing value for the amount of time you have the player and if a guy has TJ for a good chunk of the time you have him, well, that's not maximizing value.  

You do need good pitchers to win, you are correct about that.  However, making sure they're all healthy in order to make a run is almost getting lucky...like, having a guy like Grayson, Burnes, Bradish together for a year without one going down is having all the stars aligned in your favor and we're already holding our breath about Bradish.  Let's not mention Felix and how our bullpen looks without him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

You would think Dr. ElAttrache would have at least some competition in the business by now. Any med students out there reading this, Tommy John is a lucrative specialty and there appears to be only one guy doing it. 

Not so.  The Orioles’ go-to TJ surgeon is Dr. Keith Meister, who did Felix Bautista, John Means and others.  https://www.dallasnews.com/sports/rangers/2024/03/07/how-dr-keith-meister-revolutionized-tommy-john-surgery-much-to-texas-rangers-benefit/?outputType=amp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Aristotelian
      The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen

      By Aristotelian · Posted

      Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • interloper
      9/26: A Weak Effort In New York

      By interloper · Posted

      Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • Frobby
      The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen

      By Frobby · Posted

      You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • Bemorewins
      The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen

      By Bemorewins · Posted

      I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • e16bball
      DH - O'Hearn v. Kjerstad

      By e16bball · Posted

      Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • Fiver6565
      The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen

      By Fiver6565 · Posted

      I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • Tony-OH
      9/26: A Weak Effort In New York

      By Tony-OH · Posted

      I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...