Jump to content

Cole Irvin 2024


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

The article was shared / linked days ago in one of the many Orioles Facebook Groups I'm in, and a MLB reporter had cited an insider.  I just looked for it but it seems to be buried underneath all the newer posts. Doing a Google search trying to find it at first glance just brings up a different reporter on MLB speculating. It's not worth the time it takes to snoop it down because the game is on, it's mother's day, and everyone will find out what the tram does anyway soon enough.

Got it.   It wasn’t worth sharing here 3 days ago and now it’s disappeared.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Got it.   It wasn’t worth sharing here 3 days ago and now it’s disappeared.  

You're a smart guy. Go find it yourself instead of being snippy. 

Everytime I've shared articles I get people criticizing me for the fact I quoted it or copied too much of it. 

Second of all, this message board is well informed so I figured everyone would have seen it themselves. I get more info here than I do elsewhere on the Orioles so it's not like I's be adding much. 

I saw it before going to sleep so I didn't even think about making the effort to come here and post it.

But again, if it matters so much to you, go look for it. The internet is a big place, Snippy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

You're a smart guy. Go find it yourself instead of being snippy. 

Everytime I've shared articles I get people criticizing me for the fact I quoted it or copied too much of it. 

Second of all, this message board is well informed so I figured everyone would have seen it themselves. I get more info here than I do elsewhere on the Orioles so it's not like I's be adding much. 

I saw it before going to sleep so I didn't even think about making the effort to come here and post it.

But again, if it matters so much to you, go look for it. The internet is a big place, Snippy.

I’m not looking for some Facebook post by some nobody.   It’s like looking for a needle in a haystack when there’s no needle.   An insider?  LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
7 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

Hyde really should have left him in for the save opportunitty yesterday.    

Eh, I don't think giving Kimbrel a lower-stress save opportunity was a bad idea.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dunk35 said:

Go back to 5 man rotation and Dean is in the pen.  Crap outing against a crap team by DK. 

Not his first. Won’t be the last time. That’s who Dean Kremer is. He’s Jekyll and Hyde. Great here, terrible there.

It’s probably in the best interest of the team to swap places with Kremer and Irvin. Irvin has clearly been the better starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dunk35 said:

Go back to 5 man rotation and Dean is in the pen.  Crap outing against a crap team by DK. 

Seems reactionary and short sighted but okay.  Reminder that prior to tonight, in 344 IP since the beginning of 2022, Kremer is 24-15 with a 3.74 ERA and a 4.27 FIP.  It's much better to keep him on a starting routine, particular given two current members of our rotation have significant injury concerns and could go down at any time.  At this point, he has an equivalent or better track record than John Means.  Are you going to make the same post the next time Means gives up a few runs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Not his first. Won’t be the last time. That’s who Dean Kremer is. He’s Jekyll and Hyde. Great here, terrible there.

It’s probably in the best interest of the team to swap places with Kremer and Irvin. Irvin has clearly been the better starter.

Sure, in 42 IP this year.  Over their careers? Not so much.  You can't just ride the hot hand and swap people in and out of a rotation based on who happens to be pitching well at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

Sure, in 42 IP this year.  Over their careers? Not so much.  You can't just ride the hot hand and swap people in and out of a rotation based on who happens to be pitching well at the time. 

Careers are not that relevant to what is going on right now? Irvin has been the much better pitcher and Kremer has a chance to help us at the back end of the pen given that he already is a strikeout pitcher, which is what we need in the pen IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

Seems reactionary and short sighted but okay.  Reminder that prior to tonight, in 344 IP since the beginning of 2022, Kremer is 24-15 with a 3.74 ERA and a 4.27 FIP.  It's much better to keep him on a starting routine, particular given two current members of our rotation have significant injury concerns and could go down at any time.  At this point, he has an equivalent or better track record than John Means.  Are you going to make the same post the next time Means gives up a few runs?

Means has a higher ceiling than Dean imo. Floors are similar. Five man rotation at this point should be Burnes, Bradish, Irvin, GRod, Means. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bemorewins said:

Careers are not that relevant to what is going on right now? Irvin has been the much better pitcher and Kremer has a chance to help us at the back end of the pen given that he already is a strikeout pitcher, which is what we need in the pen IMO.

If you think Kremer is more effective in the pen than Irvin, that's a fair enough point.  The far more likely outcome is that Irvin's 42 IP are an outlier and he ends the year consistent with his career norms, which aren't as good as Kremer.  If that begins to be the case, you now have the issue that you have taken a proven #4 SP out of the rotation and out of starting routine and have to plug him back in as a starter.

I don't think it's a wise move for the rest of the season, but if you really feel that they are close as starting pitching options but that Kremer is more effective in the pen than Irvin, I may disagree but that's a reasonable take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dunk35 said:

Means has a higher ceiling than Dean imo. Floors are similar. Five man rotation at this point should be Burnes, Bradish, Irvin, GRod, Means. 

I'd rather have the guy that has proven to be a better starting pitcher in the rotation, but we can agree to disagree there.  I agree on Means v. Kremer.  My view is that we should be prepared for at least one of Means or Bradish to not make it through the season, and in that case I'd rather have Kremer's routine as a starter not disrupted.  Irvin did the back and forth role last year so I'm not as concerned about it with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
    • I’d have brought up Young immediately after DFAing Kimbrel. Baker has no place on this club this year. Would have been nice to see Young up here.
    • Yeah, but they could've brought him up a month ago and seen what they might have...And Im not "pining" for Brandon Young, just wondering if he's any better than some we have in the pen..
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...