Jump to content

Kyle Stowers 2024


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Nay. They have some similarities in that power is their biggest asset. However, Stowers is not afraid to dive or crash into the wall, will have a higher walk rate, and is left handed. I think he is a more well rounded player. Remains to be seen if he has any 40+ HR seasons in him. 

I agree. And I think he has a higher upside than Kjerstad because he's actually a very good fielder. He's a guy that I think deserves regular playing time.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, gtman55 said:

I agree. And I think he has a higher upside than Kjerstad because he's actually a very good fielder. He's a guy that I think deserves regular playing time.

If Elias could somehow magically combine Stowers and Kjerstad into one player, then the O's would really have something.  I think Kjerstad has a special bat, but his defense anywhere leaves a lot to be desired.  I don't know if Stowers can keep his Ks low enough to be an everyday player, but the O's should find out before Santander hits free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, gtman55 said:

I agree. And I think he has a higher upside than Kjerstad because he's actually a very good fielder. He's a guy that I think deserves regular playing time.

Is Kjerstad really that bad of a fielder? I don't see anything that tells me he can't play league average defence at a corner spot, but as always, asking genuinely because I don't know as much as most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is this kid rotting away on the bench?  He's batting .500 over the last 3 games he played.  Both Mullins and Santander have a combined 4, yes 4 hits over the past week.

Point being ---- giving Stowers more playing time will not cost us games.  If we want to win the AL East, some changes are going to be necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, .500_OR_BETTER said:

Why is this kid rotting away on the bench?  He's batting .500 over the last 3 games he played. 

And those last three games were May 25, 27 and 28.   We didn’t play on the 30th.  So how is that “rotting away on the bench?”  He started 3 of 5 games in that stretch.  He must rot very easily.  

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

And those last three games were May 25, 27 and 28.   We didn’t play on the 30th.  So how is that “rotting away on the bench?”  He started 3 of 5 games in that stretch.  He must rot very easily.  

He had what 18 AB's over the past month - Yes, he was rotting away on the bench.   Then he finally gets playing time and does well.  Goes back to the bench on the 29th.... who knows when we will see him again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

And those last three games were May 25, 27 and 28.   We didn’t play on the 30th.  So how is that “rotting away on the bench?”  He started 3 of 5 games in that stretch.  He must rot very easily.  

Kyle "Banana" Stowers.

Maybe he can have a career with that team in Savannah after the Orioles waste his prime years :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, .500_OR_BETTER said:

He had what 18 AB's over the past month - Yes, he was rotting away on the bench.   Then he finally gets playing time and does well.  Goes back to the bench on the 29th.... who knows when we will see him again.

He was recalled on May 13.  He started on May 17, 21, 25, 27, 28.  He went in late on May 15, 18, 22-24.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, .500_OR_BETTER said:

He had what 18 AB's over the past month - Yes, he was rotting away on the bench.   Then he finally gets playing time and does well.  Goes back to the bench on the 29th.... who knows when we will see him again.

So your complaint is that he didn’t play in their last game.   By the way, he hadn’t been on the team for a month, he’s been there for two weeks.  Didn’t play much the first week, played a good bit the second week.  Seems an odd time to be complaining about this.  

Incidentally, have you considered upgrading your screen name?  .600_OR_BETTER, at least!   😎
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is our outfield...

Santander   204/287/419/706

Mullins        188/233/331/564

Hays             164/225/205/430

Cowser          235/328/444/772

Stowers         389/368/556/924

It's a mathematical equation. Who would y'all play? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Natty said:

Here is our outfield...

Santander   204/287/419/706

Mullins        188/233/331/564

Hays             164/225/205/430

Cowser          235/328/444/772

Stowers         389/368/556/924

It's a mathematical equation. Who would y'all play? 

 

 

On most nights I would play:

Stowers LF

Cowser CF

Santander RF

Mullins defensive/ baserunning sub depending on where they are in the lineup.

Subject to change depending on Cowser CF defense.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Natty said:

Here is our outfield...

Santander   204/287/419/706

Mullins        188/233/331/564

Hays             164/225/205/430

Cowser          235/328/444/772

Stowers         389/368/556/924

It's a mathematical equation. Who would y'all play? 

 

 

Would you like to place a bet on Stowers posting a .924 OPS the rest of the way?  I’ll take the under.  

ZiPS updates its rest of season projections every day, incorporating the latest data for the current season.   Here’s what it spits out:

Santander .778

Mullins .714

Hays .727

Cowser .711

Stowers .735

I’m not saying these are perfect and that there’s not some serious risk that Hays and Mullins will continue to suck at he the plate.  But the analysis is more complicated than just looking at the current stat lines or watching a slumping player on TV and concluding he sucks.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...