Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2024


Spy Fox

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yes, he did miss a hittable pitch there.  The strike that was inside definitely hurt Hays in that AB but that next pitch wasn’t where the pitcher wanted.  The one that struck him out was an excellent pitch just a little off the outside corner.  

In fairness, nobody’s doing much off Bernardino this year.  RHB are hitting .125, LHB .122 and he has an 0.78 ERA.  Sometimes you have to give the other guy some credit.  
 

We have been giving the other guy credit for the last 5 months worth of Hays at bats.

Is he going to start getting any credit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We have been giving the other guy credit for the last 5 months worth of Hays at bats.

Is he going to start getting any credit?

I’m talking about the whole inning, not just Hays.  He got Mateo to hit a weak grounder in front of home plate, then struck out Gunnar on 3 pitches.  It’s not like Hays was the only one not to come through against the guy.  Then he mowed down Adley (K), O’Hearn (fly out to medium LF) and Cowser (K) the following inning.  He’s a very tough guy to hit.  At least we won’t see him today.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something to keep an eye on - Grayson posted much better spin rates across the board on all of his pitches yesterday, particularly his fastball. His fastball has never had great shape or spin and has more been good through velo and extension, but yesterday it was in plus spin territory. He also, not coincidentally, threw it a lot and had a huge 12 whiffs on his fastball. 

Maybe this was just a day when Grayson was feeling good, but if he’s made some adjustment to unlock more spin then he could be about to hit another level stuff wise. 

I don’t think Grayson’s been pitching great lately, anecdotally he’s thrown a lot of uncompetitive pitches where his mechanics get out of whack and he misses the zone badly, and that makes me concerned the shoulder could still be lingering. But if health isn’t an issue, being that hard to hit in zone can cover for a lot of issues. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Something to keep an eye on - Grayson posted much better spin rates across the board on all of his pitches yesterday, particularly his fastball. His fastball has never had great shape or spin and has more been good through velo and extension, but yesterday it was in plus spin territory. He also, not coincidentally, threw it a lot and had a huge 12 whiffs on his fastball. 

Maybe this was just a day when Grayson was feeling good, but if he’s made some adjustment to unlock more spin then he could be about to hit another level stuff wise. 

I don’t think Grayson’s been pitching great lately, anecdotally he’s thrown a lot of uncompetitive pitches where his mechanics get out of whack and he misses the zone badly, and that makes me concerned the shoulder could still be lingering. But if health isn’t an issue, being that hard to hit in zone can cover for a lot of issues. 

I don’t believe he’s still hurt…but I do think there could be some mental hurdles he’s trying to get over.  
 

Not a coincidence imo  that after both injuries he has had, he came back with mechanical issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t believe he’s still hurt…but I do think there could be some mental hurdles he’s trying to get over.  
 

Not a coincidence imo  that after both injuries he has had, he came back with mechanical issues.

Hopefully. Anything shoulder related is alarming, and Grayson is probably a higher injury risk guy given his velo. With him and Bradish’s UCL it’s just going to always feel like that’s looming for those guys, to me anyway.

I do think it is a good sign he had the minimum IL stint and his stuff doesn’t look diminished, it’s just the mechanical inconsistency. Which as you said doesn’t necessarily indicate a physical issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every year, it seems there are new stats driven by improved technologies...bat speed, exit velo, angle of elevation, etc

Let's talk spin rate....and I'll use two examples....2400 vs 2200. That is a pretty big difference. Those are revolutions per minute as I understand it.

2400/60 = 40 spins/second...

2200/60 = 36.7 spins per second

It takes about .4 seconds for the ball to reach the plate.

So, 2400 equates to 40 spins/second to 16 spins/.4 sec

2200 equates to 36.7/sec to 14.7 spins/.4 sec

That's a difference 1.3 revolutions for a 200 difference in spin rate.

Do 1.3 revolutions make that much difference? Look at a knuckle ball, basically 0 revolutions/minute and the movement it gets.

Spin rates/minutes are impressive. Spin rates .4 seconds, not so much.

I am an old school believer in location, location, location along with changing speeds.

Educate me.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attractive matchup with Kevin Gausman leading off the series.

Gausman now at 1600 innings of 109 ERA+ in his career; Grayson at 97 ERA+ in the opening chapter of his, now at about 10% of Gausman's career innings.

Maybe an interesting Deal or No Deal right now if you'd lock in Grayson having similar overall career achievement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Attractive matchup with Kevin Gausman leading off the series.

Gausman now at 1600 innings of 109 ERA+ in his career; Grayson at 97 ERA+ in the opening chapter of his, now at about 10% of Gausman's career innings.

Maybe an interesting Deal or No Deal right now if you'd lock in Grayson having similar overall career achievement.

I think I'm saying No Deal, but it's a good prompt. The 2010s O's probably did Gausman some analytic disservices relative to what the rest of the league could offer, holding him back to being basically an average SP until his FA years. The 2020s Orioles on the other hand are probably one of the better teams in MLB for Grayson to maximize his results with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

I kind of get an uneasy feeling with every Grayson start. Never really know which guy you're getting. 

His command can definitely vary widely. But he's at 2 ER or less in 17 of 22 starts since his recall last summer.  3 or 4 ER in four of those other five starts, and only one real blowup in that Angels game last month. So in the end we've been getting Good Results Grayson pretty consistently even if Good Command Grayson is off and on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Soto has been fine since his first couple appearances and appears to be picking up steam. That makes seven. Problem is Cano has been the most reliable and all of a sudden looked terrible twice in a row. Hopefully he can get in one decent appearance in the final series.
    • So It's 13 pitchers for the Wild card round? What position player are you dropping?
    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...