Jump to content

John Means 2024


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

In my book, he’s had two outings that were awful and three that were decent, including yesterday’s.  My guess is that if he has a decent outing on the 27th, the O’s won’t go through gymnastics to try to find a way to extend his rehab, even though his ERA has been a train wreck.  

Probably 28th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, capyy said:

After this start Suarez has vs one of the worst offenses in the league, will Means take Suarez next turn? Can't ask for a better rehab start from Means. 

I like the idea of Suarez closing if Kimbrel goes to the IL.  His stuff should play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

7 innings 1 hit 1 walk 8 K’s.  I guess he’s ready!

Maybe he really was treating his rehab like Spring Training.

He’s going to be on this team. I guess he starts in the bullpen. His 30 day rehab stint is up on 4/30.  Do we get a day or two for him to be activated?

Ramirez DFA for Means on 4/30

Baumann DFA for Bradish on 5/2

Akin optioned for Cionel Perez on 5/5

Burnes, Grayson, Bradish, Kremer, Irvin

Kimbrel, Cano, Suarez, Tate, Webb, Coloumbe, Perez, Means 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

 

Akin optioned for Cionel Perez on 5/5

 

I don’t know that they’ll be in a big hurry on Perez.  He can rehab through May 23 if they want him to.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Maybe he really was treating his rehab like Spring Training.

He’s going to be on this team. I guess he starts in the bullpen. His 30 day rehab stint is up on 4/30.  Do we get a day or two for him to be activated?

Ramirez DFA for Means on 4/30

Baumann DFA for Bradish on 5/2

Akin optioned for Cionel Perez on 5/5

Burnes, Grayson, Bradish, Kremer, Irvin

Kimbrel, Cano, Suarez, Tate, Webb, Coloumbe, Perez, Means 

 

Switch Means and Irvin and then I agree.   Elias and Hyde will respect Means veteran status IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
    • Trumbo was a DH impersonating a fielder, Santander is just a very poor fielder. It's not a perfect comp (is there really even such a thing?) but he is an absolutely relevant comp for this team in this situation. He is the poster child for why taking the draft pick and moving on is the right choice. And Santander is still a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier.
    • To this end I feel like we always had a pretty short leash with him. From the first three starts as an oriole to the yo-yo-ing this year. I would have preferred we just left him in the #5 starter role and see what happened. And maybe he’ll get that opportunity elsewhere like you said, whereas here it always seemed like his role was changing. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...