Jump to content

John Means 2024


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

I wonder if Povich comes up to be the 6th starter in the 6-man rotation plan

I would think they just stick with a 5 man rotation.  If they brought Povich up they might just stick him in the bullpen like they did DL Hall for the season and try to start him next year.  This is about winning now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jagwar said:

I wonder if Povich comes up to be the 6th starter in the 6-man rotation plan

The 6 man rotation sucks. You can’t just stick a starter in the pen for spot appearances and expect them to perform well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, interloper said:

Hate to see it for John but the silver lining here is definitely that we can just go back to a full bullpen and normal rotation. 

That's probably the best option given the way Hyde manages the bullpen, but I'd rather see a healthy Means as part of that five man rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Best case scenario sounds like the IL.   Worst case is he’s done for the season.   It’s hard to imagine a 3rd scenario.

Could he get the PRP route.  Would that entail 2 months of recovery?  Looks like the O's will be lucky to get Means back before the All Star break in the best case, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams will never give him the hoped for mega bucks.  Even if he was unlikely to ever get much more than a two year deal.  No it seems no team will give him even a real good one year deal.  He will be forced to accept a "prove it deal"

Honestly it might be time to go the Trevor Bauer deal.  Sign him for one year deal and if he is too much distraction you cut him.  No way a team does not sign him if he is not being intentionally black balled.  The Orioles could afford to take the chance being a great team a couple of arms away from winning it all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

Teams will never give him the hoped for mega bucks.  Even if he was unlikely to ever get much more than a two year deal.  No it seems no team will give him even a real good one year deal.  He will be forced to accept a "prove it deal"

Honestly it might be time to go the Trevor Bauer deal.  Sign him for one year deal and if he is too much distraction you cut him.  No way a team does not sign him if he is not being intentionally black balled.  The Orioles could afford to take the chance being a great team a couple of arms away from winning it all.  

Please please please stop with the Bauer! It's unbelievably tired, and smarter minds than you or I have decided that he's not worth the trouble. That means something. ME knows what he's doing.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious to see if it is immediate IL or downshifting to Irvin's swingman role is possible.

He has been preventing runs early in games, and if it is just stamina he might still be a puzzle piece in the upcoming stretch.

Obviously possible something acute happened on one of the pitches yesterday, if so that might make him a 2025-2026 two year kind of guy like Mahle or Woodruff from this past offseason if somebody really likes him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully Means comes back healthier but it’s going to be tough to rely on him going forward. Is another starter now a need? 

Irvin has been great recently but still has an xERA over 4, has mediocre stuff, and doesn’t get many whiffs or K’s. Kremer’s xERA has been around 5 the last 2 years, has mediocre stuff as well, gets a few more K’s but typically gets hit really hard when he does give up contact. They’re both fine right now as the 4/5 in the rotation, but I’m not sure I would feel comfortable with either pitching in the playoffs. And if anything happens with Bradish (or Burnes/GRod), they’re kinda screwed. A starter with an extra year of control wouldn’t be the worst idea to help with the loss of Burnes if/when he leaves as a free agent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LGOrioles said:

Hopefully Means comes back healthier but it’s going to be tough to rely on him going forward. Is another starter now a need? 

Irvin has been great recently but still has an xERA over 4, has mediocre stuff, and doesn’t get many whiffs or K’s. Kremer’s xERA has been around 5 the last 2 years, has mediocre stuff as well, gets a few more K’s but typically gets hit really hard when he does give up contact. They’re both fine right now as the 4/5 in the rotation, but I’m not sure I would feel comfortable with either pitching in the playoffs. And if anything happens with Bradish (or Burnes/GRod), they’re kinda screwed. A starter with an extra year of control wouldn’t be the worst idea to help with the loss of Burnes if/when he leaves as a free agent. 

The talk about Kramer just doesn't make sense to me.  Does he have the occasional klunker, yes.  He is slotted though as a #4 or 5 pitcher in a rotation putting up pretty good stats along the way.  No team has 5 studs and truthfully I would love for someone to find 5 #5's on MLB pitching staffs that would be a consensus better option than Kremer.  He shows up every 5th day, keep you in games and eats innings.  It wasn't that long ago that a Kremer type would be looked at as an ace of an Orioles rotation.

To your point of course I would love to have 5 Burnes types to go into the playoffs so that way you have an ace ready to go in a must win game.  That really isn't realistic though.  Kremer is solid for the role we need him for and truthfully we have way more concerns on our roster than him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gurgi said:

Teams will never give him the hoped for mega bucks.  Even if he was unlikely to ever get much more than a two year deal.  No it seems no team will give him even a real good one year deal.  He will be forced to accept a "prove it deal"

Honestly it might be time to go the Trevor Bauer deal.  Sign him for one year deal and if he is too much distraction you cut him.  No way a team does not sign him if he is not being intentionally black balled.  The Orioles could afford to take the chance being a great team a couple of arms away from winning it all.  

I live in LA and have heard and seen a lot of things from Trevor Bauer that would give me the creeps if we ever even considered signing him. Stong pass.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, turtlebowl said:

The talk about Kramer just doesn't make sense to me.  Does he have the occasional klunker, yes.  He is slotted though as a #4 or 5 pitcher in a rotation putting up pretty good stats along the way.  No team has 5 studs and truthfully I would love for someone to find 5 #5's on MLB pitching staffs that would be a consensus better option than Kremer.  He shows up every 5th day, keep you in games and eats innings.  It wasn't that long ago that a Kremer type would be looked at as an ace of an Orioles rotation.

To your point of course I would love to have 5 Burnes types to go into the playoffs so that way you have an ace ready to go in a must win game.  That really isn't realistic though.  Kremer is solid for the role we need him for and truthfully we have way more concerns on our roster than him.

I think he’s fine in the regular season but if you look around at #4 starters on contending teams like NYY, LAD, PHI, and ATL you get:

LAD: one of Walker Buehler/Bobby Miller/Clayton Kershaw (if healthy)

ATL: Reynaldo Lopez (3.60 xERA, 2.90 FIP) or Max Fried (3.16 xERA, 3.51 FIP)

NYY: Gil, Stroman, or Schmidt

PHI: Turnbull (4.19 xERA, 3.62 FIP) or Sanchez (3.73 xERA, 2.58 FIP)

 

The only guys I would consider Kremer over are Stroman (who is probably the Yankees 6th best starter when Cole comes back) or Turnbull (very similar career numbers but has been much better this year). Again, he’s fine as a #5 but I would not want him starting another playoff game and if Irvin reverts back to being a 4-4.40 ERA guy, I don’t think we would be thrilled with that either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...